YIPF5 is a Golgi- and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized protein involved in vesicular trafficking. Its functional disruption has been linked to:
Neonatal Diabetes and Microcephaly: Biallelic mutations in YIPF5 cause ER stress in pancreatic β-cells, leading to proinsulin accumulation and impaired insulin secretion. Five distinct homozygous coding variants were identified in patients with syndromic diabetes, epilepsy, and microcephaly .
Antiviral Immunity: YIPF5 facilitates STING protein trafficking via COPII vesicles, enabling DNA virus-triggered type I interferon production. Knockdown experiments in THP-1 and L929 cells showed increased HSV-1 replication due to impaired STING activation .
Cancer Mechanisms: A YIPF5-GOT1A/B complex regulates cellular responses to FLI-06, a secretory pathway inhibitor. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of YIPF5 confers resistance to FLI-06 in MCF10A cells, suggesting roles in drug sensitivity .
Western Blot: Use 10% SDS-PAGE with mouse liver or brain lysates .
IHC: Antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) or citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for human cancer tissues .
YIPF5’s interaction partners include:
YIPF5 (also known as YIP1A, FINGER5, and SMAP-5) is a small five-span transmembrane domain protein that plays crucial roles in transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. Recent studies have identified YIPF5 as a positive regulator of STING trafficking and essential for innate immune responses to DNA viruses . Additionally, YIPF5 forms complexes with other proteins including YIF1A and GOT1B to maintain Golgi structural integrity and facilitate protein transport through the secretory pathway .
Currently available YIPF5 antibodies are primarily rabbit polyclonal antibodies that show reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples. These antibodies are typically generated using immunogens derived from YIPF5 fusion proteins. The commercial antibodies recognize YIPF5 with an observed molecular weight of approximately 28-33 kDa, which aligns with the calculated molecular weight of 28 kDa for the 257 amino acid protein .
| Host | Isotype | Type | Form | Purification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rabbit | IgG | Polyclonal | Liquid | Antigen affinity chromatography/purification |
YIPF5 antibodies have been validated for multiple experimental applications:
| Application | Typical Dilution | Sample Types |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:3000 | Mouse brain/liver tissue, rat brain tissue |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | Human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tissue, human ovary cancer tissue |
| Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF) | Variable (typically 4 μg/ml) | Cell lines (e.g., U-2 OS cells) |
| ELISA | Assay-dependent | Various |
Note: Optimal dilutions are sample-dependent and should be determined empirically for each experimental system .
When investigating YIPF5's role in innate immunity:
Cell Selection: Use appropriate cell lines (THP-1, L929) or primary cells (BMDMs, MEFs) that express endogenous YIPF5 and STING.
Stimulation Parameters: Stimulate cells with DNA viruses (e.g., HSV-1), synthetic dsDNA transfection, or cGAMP treatment based on experimental goals.
Antibody Application:
For protein localization during trafficking: Optimize ICC/IF with paraformaldehyde fixation and Triton X-100 permeabilization
For detecting protein-protein interactions: Use co-immunoprecipitation with YIPF5 antibodies followed by Western blot analysis for potential binding partners (STING, components of COPII)
Controls:
For optimal results in co-localization studies, the timing of sample collection after stimulation is critical, as YIPF5-STING interaction is enhanced following DNA stimulation .
Based on research findings, several effective strategies include:
Sequential Immunoprecipitation: Use a two-step immunoprecipitation approach to isolate YIPF5-STING-COPII complexes.
First IP: Pull down YIPF5 complexes
Second IP: Use antibodies against interaction partners to confirm specificity
Domain Mapping: Utilize the knowledge that C-terminal transmembrane domains of YIPF5 interact with the fourth transmembrane domain of STING to design truncation constructs for detailed interaction studies .
Colocalization Analysis:
Perform time-course experiments after dsDNA stimulation to track YIPF5-STING colocalization
Use high-resolution microscopy (confocal, super-resolution) to visualize the spatial relationship between YIPF5, STING, and components of COPII at ER exit sites
Trafficking Inhibition: Use Brefeldin A (BFA) to block ER-Golgi trafficking and compare with FLI-06 treatment to distinguish different stages of the secretory pathway where YIPF5 functions .
These approaches can reveal how YIPF5 facilitates STING recruitment to COPII-coated vesicles during DNA virus infection .
To minimize non-specific binding:
Optimization of Antibody Dilution: Test a concentration gradient (1:500-1:3000) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio for your specific sample type.
Blocking Optimization:
Use 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST
For tissues with high endogenous biotin, add avidin-biotin blocking steps
Membrane Washing: Implement stringent washing protocols with increased wash duration (5-10 minutes per wash, 3-5 times).
Validation Through Knockdown: Include YIPF5 knockdown or knockout samples as negative controls to confirm the specificity of the detected bands at 28-33 kDa .
Sample Preparation Considerations: YIPF5 is a membrane protein, so use appropriate lysis buffers containing mild detergents (e.g., NP-40 or Triton X-100) to maintain protein structure while ensuring sufficient extraction .
When interpreting IHC results:
Antigen Retrieval Method Selection: Different tissues require different retrieval approaches:
Expression Pattern Analysis:
YIPF5 typically shows perinuclear and vesicular staining patterns
Golgi localization is prominent in normal tissues
Altered localization patterns may occur in pathological conditions
Tissue-Specific Considerations:
Multiple Antibody Validation: When possible, confirm findings with antibodies targeting different epitopes of YIPF5 to rule out epitope-specific artifacts.
Recent research has linked YIPF5 mutations to neonatal diabetes and microcephaly. When investigating these connections:
Patient-Derived Models:
Use YIPF5 antibodies in iPSC-derived β-cells from patients with YIPF5 mutations
Compare subcellular localization and trafficking patterns with wild-type controls
Mechanistic Studies:
Immunofluorescence combined with proinsulin staining to assess proinsulin trafficking defects
Co-localization with ER stress markers (BiP/GRP78, CHOP) to evaluate ER stress mechanisms
Animal Models:
Therapeutic Intervention Assessment:
To investigate the recently identified YIPF5-GOT1A/B complex:
Complex Isolation Strategies:
Sequential immunoprecipitation with antibodies against YIPF5 followed by GOT1A or GOT1B
Blue native PAGE to preserve native complex structures
Size exclusion chromatography to isolate intact complexes
Drug Perturbation Analysis:
Treat cells with FLI-06 to disrupt the complex and analyze changes in composition
Compare the effects of different trafficking inhibitors on complex stability
Mutational Analysis:
Generate constructs with mutations in key interaction domains
Use YIPF5 antibodies to assess how mutations affect complex formation and trafficking function
Dynamics Assessment:
This complex appears to play a role in a transcription-independent mechanism of ER export, and understanding its composition and regulation could provide insights into fundamental cell biology mechanisms .
YIPF5 research is expanding beyond its established roles:
Antiviral Immunity Assessment:
Use YIPF5 antibodies to track its redistribution during viral infection
Investigate potential roles in responses to different DNA virus families (herpesviruses, adenoviruses)
Explore whether YIPF5 is targeted by viral evasion mechanisms
Cell Stress Response Studies:
Examine YIPF5 localization during different cellular stresses (ER stress, oxidative stress)
Investigate potential stress-induced post-translational modifications using phospho-specific or other modification-specific antibodies
Developmental Biology Applications:
Track YIPF5 expression patterns during embryonic development with particular focus on brain and pancreas
Correlate expression with developmental milestones in these tissues
Cancer Research:
Emerging methodologies for studying YIPF5's dynamic interactions include:
Proximity Labeling Approaches:
BioID or TurboID fusion with YIPF5 to identify proximal proteins in living cells
APEX2-based proximity labeling for temporal analysis of interaction partners
Advanced Imaging Techniques:
FRET/FLIM analysis of YIPF5 interactions with STING, COPII components, or GOT1A/B
Lattice light-sheet microscopy for high-speed, low-phototoxicity imaging of trafficking dynamics
Super-resolution microscopy techniques (STORM, PALM) to visualize nanoscale organization
Optogenetic Control Systems:
Light-inducible protein interaction systems to trigger or disrupt YIPF5 complex formation
Optogenetic control of YIPF5 localization to study spatial requirements of function
Single-Molecule Tracking:
These approaches can provide unprecedented insights into how YIPF5 dynamically regulates trafficking processes and immune responses in real-time.