SPBC337.03 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Basic Characteristics

The SPBC337.03 Antibody is a monoclonal antibody developed against the Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) protein encoded by the gene SPBC337.03. This antibody is part of a specialized collection of custom antibodies designed for research applications, particularly in molecular biology and yeast genetics .

Biological Context of SPBC

The SPBC337.03 gene in S. pombe encodes a hypothetical protein with limited functional annotation. Fission yeast is a model organism for studying eukaryotic cellular processes, including cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, and chromatin dynamics. Antibodies targeting specific S. pombe proteins, such as SPBC337.03, are critical tools for:

  • Localizing proteins within cellular compartments.

  • Validating gene knockout or overexpression strains.

  • Investigating protein-protein interaction networks .

Current Use Cases

  • Functional Genomics: Used in high-throughput screens to characterize unannotated proteins in S. pombe.

  • Protein Localization: Supports subcellular localization studies via immunofluorescence .

Known Limitations

  • Specificity: Limited validation data beyond vendor-provided information.

  • Cross-Reactivity: No published studies confirm reactivity with orthologous proteins in other species.

Comparative Analysis with Other S. pombe Antibodies

The Cusabio collection includes over 30 antibodies targeting S. pombe proteins, such as sen54, cut2, and sec72 . Below is a comparative overview:

Antibody TargetProduct CodeUniProt IDKey Applications
SPBC337.03CSB-PA524893XA01SXVO74814Localization, IP
sen54CSB-PA529220XA01SXVO74908DNA repair studies
cut2CSB-PA019074XA01SXVP21135Mitotic regulation
sec72CSB-PA873803XA01SXVQ9P7V5ER-Golgi trafficking

Gaps in Current Knowledge

  • Functional Role: The biological function of SPBC337.03 remains uncharacterized.

  • Antibody Performance: No peer-reviewed studies using this antibody are available.

  • Epitope Mapping: The exact binding epitope has not been disclosed .

Future Research Directions

  • Cryo-EM/Structural Studies: Determine the 3D structure of SPBC337.03.

  • Interaction Profiling: Use immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry to identify binding partners.

  • Phenotypic Analysis: Apply CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts to assess gene essentiality.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPBC337.03 antibody; UPF0400 protein C337.03 antibody
Target Names
SPBC337.03
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What are protein complexes and why are they important in cellular function?

Protein complexes are assemblies of multiple protein subunits that interact to form functional units. They are essential for cellular complexity, even in the simplest microorganisms. For example, hemoglobin is composed of two alpha and two beta globin subunits. These complexes enable sophisticated biological functions that would be impossible with individual proteins alone, serving as the foundation for diverse cellular processes .

What techniques are currently available for structural characterization of protein complexes?

Several complementary techniques are available for structural characterization:

  • X-ray crystallography: The first method to make structural biology a reality, combining protein purification, powerful X-ray sources, and computational methods to solve diffraction patterns .

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM): Increasingly popular for large heteromeric structures, this technique has recently revolutionized structural biology .

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy: Particularly useful for studying protein dynamics and interactions in solution .

  • Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy: Provides insights into specific aspects of protein complex structure .

What are the non-structural methods for characterizing protein complexes?

Several techniques provide complementary information to structural methods:

  • Native mass spectrometry: Determines composition and stoichiometry of intact complexes .

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry: Identifies proximity relationships between subunits .

  • Affinity-purification mass spectrometry: Maps protein-protein interaction networks .

  • Super-resolution microscopy: Visualizes protein complexes within cellular contexts .

How should expression vectors be designed for efficient production of heteromeric protein complexes?

For heteromeric protein complexes, vector design should consider the natural assembly pathway of the complex. Research demonstrates that yields of fully-assembled native complexes can be significantly improved by mimicking the native operon structure in expression vectors. The order of genes within operons has evolved to match the assembly order of protein complexes, and respecting this order in experimental design can markedly increase assembly efficiency .

What challenges are specific to heteromeric protein complex expression and purification?

Expression of heteromeric complexes presents several challenges:

  • Assembly efficiency is often lower in non-native host systems, making purification difficult.

  • For eukaryotic proteins, post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications may be absent in bacterial expression systems.

  • Complete assembly may be hindered by incorrect stoichiometry of subunits.

  • The order of gene expression can significantly impact assembly efficiency, as demonstrated by studies showing operon gene order closely matches assembly order .

What considerations should guide the selection of structural characterization methods for specific protein complexes?

Method selection should be guided by:

  • Complex size: Large heteromeric complexes may be better suited for Cryo-EM, while smaller complexes might be amenable to X-ray crystallography or NMR.

  • Dynamics: For highly dynamic complexes, NMR might provide more relevant information than crystallography.

  • Available sample quantity: X-ray crystallography typically requires larger amounts of purified protein.

  • Resolution requirements: Different methods provide different resolution capabilities, with X-ray crystallography typically offering the highest resolution .

How does operon gene order influence the assembly efficiency of protein complexes?

Research demonstrates that operon gene order is optimized for efficient protein complex assembly. Adjacent genes within operons are more likely to physically interact, and the order of genes closely matches the order of assembly of the resulting protein complex. This optimization is particularly important for lowly expressed protein complexes, suggesting an evolutionary pressure to maximize assembly efficiency when protein concentration is limiting .

What molecular mechanisms regulate protein complex stoichiometry in cells?

Cellular regulation of protein complex stoichiometry involves multiple mechanisms:

  • Coordinated gene expression: For heteromeric complexes, subunit genes often show coordinated expression patterns.

  • Differential degradation kinetics: Non-exponentially degraded (NED) proteins are enriched in heteromeric complexes and are often produced in excess.

  • Protein attenuation: In heteromeric complexes, excess subunits not incorporated into complexes may be degraded to maintain proper stoichiometry.

  • Assembly-coupled degradation: The degradation of unassembled subunits helps maintain proper stoichiometric ratios .

How do cells handle excess subunits of heteromeric protein complexes?

Excess subunits of heteromeric complexes are subject to several regulatory mechanisms:

  • Non-exponential degradation: Unassembled subunits often show distinct degradation kinetics.

  • Attenuation: Studies of aneuploid cells reveal that excess subunits of heteromeric complexes are preferentially degraded.

  • Aggregation: Unassembled subunits may form aggregates, particularly those with greater structural disorder.

  • The degree of attenuation appears to increase with increasing complex size, suggesting more complex regulatory mechanisms for larger assemblies .

How can computational methods complement experimental approaches in protein complex research?

Computational methods enhance protein complex research through:

  • Top-down modeling: Using existing structural data to model complexes.

  • De novo structure prediction: Predicting structures without templates.

  • Databases and repositories: Organizing and providing access to protein complex data.

  • Assembly pathway prediction: Computational approaches can predict likely assembly pathways based on structural and interaction data .

What evolutionary insights can be gained from studying protein complex assembly?

Evolutionary analysis of protein complexes reveals:

  • Conservation of assembly order: The assembly order of protein complexes is often conserved across species.

  • Selection pressure on gene order: In bacteria, gene order in operons is under selection to match protein complex assembly order.

  • Paralogous families: Some protein complexes, such as SMC-kleisin regulators (Hawk proteins), show evolutionary relationships through paralogous families.

  • These patterns suggest that efficient assembly of protein complexes is a significant evolutionary force, particularly in organisms with limited resources .

How can researchers address challenges in crystallizing heteromeric protein complexes?

Strategies to improve crystallization of heteromeric complexes include:

  • Co-expression strategies: Expressing all subunits simultaneously in the correct order.

  • Sequential purification: Using affinity tags on different subunits for sequential purification steps.

  • Assembly pathway consideration: Designing expression constructs based on known assembly pathways.

  • Buffer optimization: Identifying conditions that promote complex stability without interfering with crystallization .

What approaches can be used to study transient or unstable protein complexes?

For challenging transient complexes, researchers can employ:

  • Chemical cross-linking: Stabilizing interactions before analysis.

  • High-speed analytical techniques: Capturing short-lived states.

  • Computational modeling: Predicting interaction interfaces and transient states.

  • Mutation of interfacial residues: Potentially stabilizing interactions for easier characterization .

How are integrated structural biology approaches transforming protein complex research?

The integration of multiple techniques is revolutionizing the field:

  • Hybrid methods: Combining data from different structural techniques to generate more complete models.

  • Integrative modeling: Using computational approaches to synthesize diverse experimental data.

  • In-cell structural biology: Developing methods to study complexes in their native cellular environment.

  • Time-resolved studies: Capturing the dynamics of complex assembly and function .

What role might artificial intelligence play in advancing protein complex research?

AI approaches are increasingly important for:

  • Structure prediction: Recent advances in AI-based structure prediction are particularly relevant for protein complexes.

  • Assembly pathway modeling: Predicting likely assembly intermediates and pathways.

  • Data integration: Synthesizing diverse experimental datasets.

  • Experimental design: Suggesting optimal approaches for specific protein complexes .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.