SPC24 is a critical component of the NDC80 kinetochore complex, involved in chromosome segregation during mitosis. Dysregulation of SPC24 has been implicated in carcinogenesis, particularly in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and other malignancies .
Recent studies highlight SPC24's role in cancer progression:
mRNA Overexpression: SPC24 is significantly upregulated in LSCC tissues compared to adjacent nonneoplastic tissues (|log FC| > 2.0, P < 0.001) .
Protein Expression: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot analyses confirmed elevated SPC24 protein levels in LSCC samples .
Prognostic Value: High SPC24 expression correlates with poor survival outcomes in LSCC patients (HR = 1.72, P = 0.004) .
Antibodies targeting SPC24 have been developed and validated for research applications:
| Antibody Clone | Vendor | Application | Host Species | Dilution | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBP2-47264 | Novus | WB, IHC | Rabbit | 1:500 | |
| NBP2-14098 | Novus | IHC | Rabbit | 1:50 |
Mechanistic Role: Anti-SPC24 antibodies inhibit cancer cell proliferation by disrupting mitotic spindle assembly in in vitro models .
Therapeutic Potential: Preclinical studies suggest that targeting SPC24 could enhance chemosensitivity in LSCC .
Western Blot: Anti-SPC24 (NBP2-47264) detected a ~24 kDa protein band in LSCC lysates, consistent with SPC24’s molecular weight .
Immunohistochemistry: Strong cytoplasmic staining of SPC24 was observed in 78% of LSCC tissues (n = 39), compared to weak staining in nonneoplastic controls .
While SPC24-specific antibodies like NBP2-47264 are well-characterized, the term "SPCC24B10.06" does not correspond to any known antibody in public databases (e.g., UniProt, PubMed, or vendor catalogs). Potential explanations include:
Typographical errors (e.g., "SPC24" vs. "SPCC24").
Proprietary identifiers not yet published in open-access literature.
KEGG: spo:SPCC24B10.06
SPCC24B10.06 is likely the Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) homolog of the SPC24 gene. Based on comparative genomics, it belongs to a family of cell cycle-related genes that play critical roles in kinetochore assembly and chromosome segregation during mitosis. The SPC24 protein forms part of the NDC80 kinetochore complex, which is essential for proper attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle. This protein has been identified as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in cancer research, particularly in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) .
Antibodies against SPCC24B10.06 are typically generated through immunization of host animals with purified recombinant protein or synthetic peptides derived from the target sequence. For polyclonal antibodies, the process generally involves repeated immunization of rabbits with highly purified antigen, followed by collection of antisera and purification of IgG through affinity chromatography . For monoclonal antibodies, hybridoma technology would be employed after mouse immunization. The resulting antibodies are then validated for specificity through various techniques including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry to ensure they recognize the intended target with high specificity.
SPCC24B10.06 antibodies can be applied in multiple research techniques, including:
Western blotting: For detection of the protein in cell or tissue lysates (typical working dilution range: 0.1-2 μg/ml)
ELISA: For quantitative detection (typical concentration range: 1-5 μg/ml)
Immunohistochemistry: For visualization of protein expression in tissue sections
Immunofluorescence: For subcellular localization studies
Immunoprecipitation: For protein-protein interaction studies
Chromatin immunoprecipitation: For studies of DNA-protein interactions
Flow cytometry: For quantitative analysis at the single-cell level
SPCC24B10.06 is the S. pombe ortholog of the human SPC24 gene. Human SPC24 has been identified as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in cancer research. Recent studies have shown that SPC24 may be associated with LSCC malignancy and represents a novel therapeutic target . The evolutionary conservation of this protein across species suggests fundamental roles in cell division and chromosome segregation, making the study of SPCC24B10.06 in model organisms relevant to understanding human disease mechanisms.
The following research models are suitable for studying SPCC24B10.06 function:
| Model System | Advantages | Applications |
|---|---|---|
| S. pombe | Native expression of SPCC24B10.06 | Genetic studies, protein localization |
| S. cerevisiae | Well-characterized kinetochore | Comparative functional studies |
| Human cell lines | Relevance to human diseases | Cancer studies, drug development |
| Mouse models | In vivo studies | Developmental and cancer research |
For optimal Western blotting with SPCC24B10.06 antibodies, researchers should consider the following protocol:
Sample preparation: Lyse cells in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors and centrifuge at 12,000 rpm to collect the supernatant
Protein separation: Use SDS-PAGE to separate proteins based on molecular weight
Blocking: Incubate membrane with blocking solution at 37°C for 2 hours
Primary antibody: Incubate with SPCC24B10.06 antibody at a concentration of 0.1-2 μg/ml overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: Incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 hours
Detection: Use enhanced DAB solution or ECL for visualization
Analysis: Quantify using densitometry software such as ImageJ
Validation of SPCC24B10.06 antibody specificity should involve multiple complementary approaches:
Western blot analysis showing a single band at the expected molecular weight
Testing on knockout or knockdown samples as negative controls
Competitive inhibition with the immunizing peptide
Comparison of staining patterns across multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins
Cross-validation with orthogonal techniques (e.g., mRNA expression)
Verification across multiple cell types or tissues with known expression patterns
To effectively study SPCC24B10.06 protein interactions, researchers should employ these methodological approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation: Use SPCC24B10.06 antibodies to pull down the protein complex from cell lysates under native conditions
Proximity ligation assay: Visualize protein-protein interactions in situ within intact cells
Yeast two-hybrid screening: Identify novel interaction partners
Mass spectrometry of immunoprecipitated complexes: Comprehensively identify components of multiprotein complexes
FRET or BRET analysis: Measure real-time interactions in living cells
BiFC (Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation): Visualize interaction-dependent fluorescence reconstitution
Crosslinking mass spectrometry: Map interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact antibody recognition of SPCC24B10.06 through several mechanisms:
Phosphorylation at sites within or adjacent to epitopes may alter antibody binding affinity
Epitope masking can occur when modifications change protein conformation
Some antibodies may specifically recognize or be blocked by certain PTMs
Researchers should select antibodies based on whether they need to detect total protein or specific modified forms
Western blotting with phosphatase treatment can help determine if phosphorylation affects antibody binding
Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes should be used to obtain a complete picture of protein expression and modification
For successful chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies using SPCC24B10.06 antibodies, researchers should:
Optimize crosslinking conditions (typically 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes)
Generate DNA fragments of appropriate size (200-500 bp) through sonication
Use 2-5 μg of SPCC24B10.06 antibody per ChIP reaction
Include appropriate controls (IgG control, input samples)
Validate antibody specificity for the ChIP application specifically
Consider ChIP-sequencing to identify genome-wide binding sites
Analyze data using appropriate bioinformatics tools for peak calling and gene ontology analysis
Validate findings with orthogonal techniques (e.g., ChIP-qPCR)
For optimal immunohistochemical detection of SPCC24B10.06:
Tissue preparation: Fix tissues appropriately (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections are common)
Antigen retrieval: Test multiple methods (heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate or EDTA buffers)
Blocking: Block endogenous peroxidase activity and non-specific binding sites
Primary antibody incubation: Use SPCC24B10.06 antibody at optimized concentration (start with 1-5 μg/ml)
Secondary antibody: Use appropriate species-specific detection system
Counterstaining: Use hematoxylin for nuclear visualization
Controls: Include positive and negative controls in each experiment
Quantification: Use digital image analysis for quantitative assessment
For optimizing ELISA assays with SPCC24B10.06 antibodies:
Plate coating: Coat with capture antibody or recombinant antigen (1-10 μg/ml)
Blocking: Use 1-5% BSA or non-fat milk in PBS
Sample preparation: Prepare cell or tissue lysates under conditions that preserve the native protein
Primary antibody: Titrate SPCC24B10.06 antibody (typical range: 1-5 μg/ml)
Secondary antibody: Use HRP-conjugated or biotin-conjugated detection antibodies
Standard curve: Include recombinant SPCC24B10.06 protein as a standard
Detection system: TMB substrate for colorimetric detection
Validation: Verify specificity with positive and negative controls
Data analysis: Use appropriate curve-fitting methods for quantification
To study SPCC24B10.06 localization throughout the cell cycle:
Synchronization: Use methods like double thymidine block or nocodazole treatment to synchronize cells
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Stain fixed cells with SPCC24B10.06 antibody
Co-staining: Label with cell cycle markers (e.g., cyclins, phospho-histone H3)
Live-cell imaging: Use fluorescently tagged SPCC24B10.06 for real-time dynamics
Super-resolution microscopy: Achieve nanoscale resolution of kinetochore organization
Flow cytometry: Combine with DNA content analysis for quantitative assessment
Biochemical fractionation: Separate cellular compartments and assess protein distribution
Correlative light and electron microscopy: Connect protein localization with ultrastructural features
For accurate quantification of SPCC24B10.06 expression:
Western blotting: Perform with dilution series of samples and standards
Densitometry: Quantify band intensity using ImageJ or similar software
qRT-PCR: Measure mRNA levels with validated primers
ELISA: Use for quantitative protein measurement in cell or tissue lysates
Mass spectrometry: Apply targeted proteomics approaches for absolute quantification
Flow cytometry: Quantify at the single-cell level
Digital pathology: Use image analysis algorithms for immunohistochemistry quantification
Normalization: Always normalize to appropriate housekeeping proteins or genes
Combining SPCC24B10.06 antibodies with genetic manipulation offers powerful experimental approaches:
RNAi or CRISPR knockout validation: Confirm antibody specificity using knockdown/knockout samples
Rescue experiments: Reintroduce wild-type or mutant SPCC24B10.06 and assess functional recovery
Domain mapping: Create truncation or point mutants to identify functional regions
Tagging strategies: Add epitope tags for orthogonal detection methods
Inducible expression systems: Study consequences of controlled expression
Site-directed mutagenesis: Investigate the impact of specific modifications on antibody recognition
Chimeric proteins: Evaluate domain functions through domain swapping
Imaging: Combine with fluorescent protein fusions for live-cell dynamics studies
SPCC24B10.06/SPC24 has important connections to cancer development:
SPC24 has been identified as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC)
Research indicates that SPC24 may be associated with LSCC malignancy and represents a novel therapeutic target
As a component of the NDC80 kinetochore complex, SPC24 dysregulation can lead to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy
Differential expression analysis has shown SPC24 to be among the hub genes differentially expressed in LSCC compared to normal tissues
Bioinformatic analysis using robust rank aggregation (RRA) has identified SPC24 as a key differentially expressed gene in cancer
Survival analysis has suggested a correlation between SPC24 expression and patient outcomes
Integration of expression data with clinical features through weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) further supports its role in cancer progression
Based on current research methodologies, the following bioinformatics approaches are most effective:
Differential expression analysis: Using robust rank aggregation (RRA) analysis to identify significant expression changes across multiple datasets
Network analysis: Applying weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to explore associations between SPCC24B10.06/SPC24 and clinical features
Protein-protein interaction (PPI) mapping: Using the STRING database to construct interaction networks and identify functional modules
Pathway enrichment: Employing DAVID database for Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analyses to understand biological context
Survival analysis: Utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression to identify prognostic value
ROC curve analysis: Assessing diagnostic potential through area under the curve (AUC) calculations
Integrative multi-omics approaches: Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and clinical data for comprehensive analysis
SPCC24B10.06 antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating kinetochore assembly:
Immunoprecipitation studies can identify novel interaction partners within the kinetochore complex
ChIP assays can map the association of kinetochore proteins with centromeric DNA
Immunofluorescence microscopy can visualize the temporal and spatial dynamics of kinetochore assembly
Western blotting can monitor expression levels and post-translational modifications during mitosis
Proximity ligation assays can detect specific protein-protein interactions within the kinetochore in situ
Mass spectrometry of immunoprecipitated complexes can comprehensively characterize kinetochore composition
Super-resolution microscopy with specific antibodies can reveal the nanoscale architecture of kinetochores
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) can assess protein turnover within the kinetochore structure
Several promising translational applications are emerging:
Diagnostic biomarker development: SPC24 has been identified as a potential diagnostic biomarker for LSCC
Prognostic stratification: Expression levels may help identify high-risk patient subgroups
Therapeutic target identification: Research suggests SPC24 as a novel therapeutic target for LSCC
Drug development: Targeting the NDC80 complex function represents a potential cancer treatment strategy
Companion diagnostics: SPC24 expression might predict response to mitotic inhibitors
Precision medicine approaches: Expression patterns could guide personalized treatment decisions
Immunotherapy development: Understanding the role of SPC24 in immune response to tumors
Combination therapy strategies: Targeting SPC24 in conjunction with established therapies
Integration strategies for comprehensive chromosome segregation research include:
Combining SPCC24B10.06 antibody staining with FISH to correlate protein localization with chromosomal abnormalities
Implementing multi-color live-cell imaging to simultaneously track kinetochore components and chromosomes
Applying ChIP-seq to map genome-wide binding patterns of kinetochore proteins
Utilizing proteomics approaches to characterize the dynamic interactome throughout mitosis
Developing mathematical models of kinetochore-microtubule attachments incorporating experimental data
Correlating protein expression with aneuploidy in clinical samples
Employing CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to study the effects of specific mutations on chromosome segregation
Integrating structural biology techniques (cryo-EM, X-ray crystallography) with functional studies