The search results include extensive data on antibodies targeting:
Staphylococcus aureus toxins (e.g., SEB-neutralizing Hm0487 , SpA5-targeting Abs-9 , and Protein A-targeting 514G3 )
SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g., SC27 broadly neutralizing antibody )
Autoimmune diseases (e.g., anti-PM/Scl antibodies in systemic sclerosis )
None of these references mention "SPCC550.07," nor do they describe antibodies with alphanumeric identifiers matching this format.
The identifier "SPCC550.07" does not conform to standard antibody naming conventions (e.g., "Hm0487," "514G3").
It may represent an internal catalog number from a proprietary database or unpublished research.
The latest search results include studies published through December 2024. If "SPCC550.07" was discovered after this date, it would not appear in the analyzed materials.
To resolve this discrepancy, consider:
Verifying the Antibody Identifier
Confirm the exact spelling and formatting (e.g., "SPCC550.07" vs. "SPC-C550.07").
Consulting Proprietary Databases
Platforms like PLAbDab or commercial antibody repositories (e.g., Thermo Fisher, Abcam) may list non-publicly disclosed antibodies.
Contacting Research Institutions
| Antibody Name | Target | Mechanism of Action | Development Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hm0487 | Staphylococcal SEB | Neutralizes SEB via allosteric effects | Preclinical validation |
| Abs-9 | SpA5 (S. aureus) | Binds α-helix epitopes to block immune evasion | Phase I clinical trial |
| 514G3 | Protein A (S. aureus) | IgG3 subclass evades SpA binding | Preclinical efficacy |
| SC27 | SARS-CoV-2 Spike | Targets conserved epitopes across variants | Preclinical development |
KEGG: spo:SPCC550.07
STRING: 4896.SPCC550.07.1
SPCC550.07 is a protein encoded in the genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843), commonly known as fission yeast. This protein has been investigated in the context of cell cycle regulation and cellular morphology studies. The antibody against SPCC550.07 (e.g., CSB-PA523960XA01SXV) is primarily used in experimental systems focused on:
Fission yeast cell biology research
Cell division cycle studies
Cellular morphogenesis investigations
Protein-protein interaction networks in S. pombe
The antibody is typically raised in rabbit and produced through recombinant protein immunization strategies to ensure specificity for the target protein in S. pombe extracts .
Validating antibody specificity is critical for reliable research outcomes. For SPCC550.07 antibody, implement these methodological approaches:
Genetic knockout comparison: Use wild-type and SPCC550.07 deletion strains of S. pombe to confirm absence of signal in knockout samples
siRNA knockdown validation: As demonstrated in research practices for other proteins, siRNA-mediated knockdown provides critical negative controls for antibody specificity
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with purified SPCC550.07 recombinant protein prior to application
Cross-reactivity testing: Test the antibody against related fission yeast proteins to ensure specificity
Multiple detection methods: Compare results across Western blot, immunofluorescence, and ELISA applications
This multi-faceted validation approach significantly improves experimental reliability and reproducibility, addressing concerns about antibody specificity that contribute to the reproducibility crisis in biological research .
Based on standard protocols for similar antibodies in S. pombe research:
When working with SPCC550.07 antibody, centrifuge briefly before opening the tube to collect all liquid at the bottom, especially after thawing from frozen storage .
The following protocol has been optimized for detecting SPCC550.07 in S. pombe lysates:
Sample preparation:
Grow S. pombe cultures to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.5-0.8)
Harvest cells (1-5 × 10^7 cells) by centrifugation
Prepare extracts following established S. pombe protocols, similar to those used for Spo4-HA detection
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Western blotting protocol:
Resolve proteins on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels
Transfer to PVDF membrane (recommended over nitrocellulose for yeast proteins)
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with SPCC550.07 antibody at 1:1000 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 3× with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour
Detect using chemiluminescence
Always include a loading control (e.g., anti-α-tubulin antibody at 1:1000)
This protocol can be adjusted based on protein expression levels and specific experimental requirements.
For successful immunofluorescence detection of SPCC550.07 in fission yeast:
Cell fixation: Use glutaraldehyde (0.25%) and paraformaldehyde (3.7%) combination for 30 minutes to preserve S. pombe cellular structures
Cell wall digestion: Treat with zymolyase (1 mg/mL) for 30 minutes to improve antibody penetration
Blocking: Use 1% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 hour
Primary antibody: Dilute SPCC550.07 antibody 1:100-1:500 in blocking buffer, incubate overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: Use Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:500 dilution
Nuclear counterstain: Include DAPI (1 μg/mL) to visualize nuclei
Controls: Include the following critical controls:
Wild-type vs. SPCC550.07 deletion strain
Primary antibody omission control
Pre-immune serum control
For co-localization studies, consider using established S. pombe markers such as Sad1 for spindle pole bodies or anti-α-tubulin for microtubules .
For successful co-immunoprecipitation to identify SPCC550.07 interaction partners:
Cell lysis:
Grow 50-100 mL of S. pombe culture to mid-log phase
Harvest cells and lyse using glass beads in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitors
Clear lysate by centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 15 min, 4°C)
Immunoprecipitation:
Pre-clear lysate with Protein A/G beads for 1 hour
Incubate cleared lysate with SPCC550.07 antibody (5-10 μg) overnight at 4°C
Add Protein A/G beads and incubate for 2-3 hours
Wash beads 4× with wash buffer (lysis buffer with reduced detergent)
Elute proteins with SDS sample buffer or low pH glycine
Analysis:
Analyze by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting or mass spectrometry
Include IgG control immunoprecipitation
Validate interactions with reverse co-IP using antibodies against putative partners
This approach is similar to methods used to identify interaction partners of other S. pombe proteins like Spo4 and Spo6 .
For studying cell cycle-dependent changes in SPCC550.07:
Synchronization strategies:
Use nitrogen starvation and release for G1 synchronization
Employ hydroxyurea block and release for S-phase synchronization
Implement cdc25-22 temperature-sensitive mutants for G2/M synchronization
Time-course sampling:
Collect samples at 15-20 minute intervals across 1-2 cell cycles
Confirm synchronization by monitoring septation index and DAPI staining
Process samples simultaneously for Western blotting and immunofluorescence
Analysis approaches:
Quantify protein levels by Western blot, normalizing to a stable reference protein
Track localization changes by immunofluorescence
Correlate with cell cycle markers (e.g., Cdc13, Cut2)
Co-visualization techniques:
Combine with live-cell imaging techniques if working with tagged versions
Use multi-color immunofluorescence to correlate with known cell cycle markers
This approach allows correlating SPCC550.07 dynamics with specific cell cycle stages, similar to studies performed for other S. pombe proteins involved in cell morphology regulation .
To investigate potential roles in morphogenesis:
Genetic manipulation approaches:
Generate knockout and overexpression strains
Create temperature-sensitive mutants for conditional studies
Construct point mutations in key functional domains
Morphological analysis:
Measure cell dimensions (length, width) in mutant vs. wild-type cells
Analyze cellular shape using quantitative image analysis
Assess polarity markers distribution (e.g., Tea1, Pom1)
Growth condition variations:
Test protein function under standard conditions vs. stress conditions
Evaluate recovery from cell cycle arrests
Assess response to cell wall/membrane perturbations
Relationship to known morphogenesis regulators:
This systematic approach allows determining whether SPCC550.07 functions in pathways similar to the 11 genes identified in genome-wide screens for cell width regulators in S. pombe .
Beyond standard co-immunoprecipitation, these advanced approaches can reveal SPCC550.07 interaction partners:
Proximity-dependent labeling:
Express SPCC550.07 fused to BioID or TurboID in S. pombe
Use the antibody to confirm expression and localization
Identify biotinylated proteins as proximity partners
Cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP):
Treat cells with formaldehyde to cross-link protein complexes
Immunoprecipitate with SPCC550.07 antibody
Identify partners by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions with reciprocal experiments
Two-hybrid validation:
Use yeast two-hybrid screening to identify potential interactors
Validate interactions with co-IP using the SPCC550.07 antibody
Perform quantitative binding studies with purified components
Functional validation:
Knockdown/knockout of interaction partners
Assess effects on SPCC550.07 localization and function
Test for genetic interactions and phenotypic similarities
This strategy mirrors approaches used to characterize other protein complexes in S. pombe, such as the Cdc7-Dbf4-like kinase complex (Spo4-Spo6) .
To investigate potential post-translational modifications:
Phosphorylation analysis:
Immunoprecipitate SPCC550.07 using the specific antibody
Analyze by phospho-specific staining or mass spectrometry
Create phospho-mimetic and phospho-deficient mutants of predicted sites
Use phosphatase treatment to confirm modifications
Other modifications:
Test for ubiquitination by immunoprecipitating under denaturing conditions
Investigate SUMOylation using co-IP with SUMO components
Examine potential glycosylation using glycosidase treatments
Kinase/enzyme identification:
Perform kinase inhibitor screens to identify regulatory pathways
Test candidate kinases in vitro using recombinant proteins
Create genetic knockouts of candidate modifying enzymes
Functional consequences:
Correlate modifications with cell cycle stages or stress responses
Test how mutations affecting modification sites impact protein function
Investigate how modifications affect protein-protein interactions
This approach is similar to methodologies used to characterize phosphorylation of the Spo4 kinase (Thr264) in S. pombe, which was critical for understanding its regulation .
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal in Western blot | Insufficient protein expression | Increase cell concentration or optimize extraction protocol |
| Protein degradation | Include fresh protease inhibitors; maintain samples at 4°C | |
| Inefficient transfer | Optimize transfer conditions for yeast proteins; use PVDF membrane | |
| Antibody concentration too low | Increase primary antibody concentration to 1:500 or 1:200 | |
| High background | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking time/concentration; use 5% BSA instead of milk |
| Secondary antibody issues | Reduce secondary antibody concentration; use more stringent washing | |
| Contamination | Prepare fresh buffers; handle membranes with clean forceps | |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity | Use peptide competition assay to identify specific band |
| Protein degradation | Add more protease inhibitors; reduce sample processing time | |
| Post-translational modifications | Verify with phosphatase treatment or other modification-specific approaches | |
| Weak signal in IF | Poor fixation | Optimize fixation conditions for S. pombe cells |
| Insufficient cell wall digestion | Increase zymolyase concentration/incubation time | |
| Epitope masking | Try different fixation methods (e.g., methanol vs. formaldehyde) |
Implement systematic troubleshooting by changing one variable at a time and documenting results meticulously.
To ensure specificity and minimize false positives:
Essential controls:
Validation across techniques:
Compare results from Western blot, immunofluorescence, and immunoprecipitation
Verify that the same molecular weight band is detected consistently
Confirm that localization patterns match expected distribution
Quantitative assessment:
Perform titration experiments with different antibody concentrations
Plot signal-to-noise ratios to determine optimal working concentration
Compare signals between specific and non-specific bands
Confirmatory approaches:
Use epitope-tagged versions of SPCC550.07 and compare antibody detection with anti-tag antibodies
Verify results with a second antibody against a different epitope if available
Correlate antibody detection with mRNA expression data