SPAPB1A11.04c Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

SPAPB1A11.04c Gene and Its Product

The SPAPB1A11.04c gene in S. pombe encodes a zinc binuclear cluster transcription factor named Mca1 (meiosis copper starvation-dependent activator). Key findings include:

  • Function: Mca1 activates the mfc1 gene under copper starvation during meiosis, facilitating copper transport .

  • Structure: Mca1 contains a DNA-binding domain, a regulatory region, and a transactivation domain .

  • Knockout Effects: Disruption of SPAPB1A11.04c reduces mfc1 mRNA levels by ~8-fold under copper-limiting conditions, indicating its critical role in transcriptional regulation .

Antibody Development Context

While no studies explicitly describe an SPAPB1A11.04c antibody, general antibody development principles and analogous research provide context:

  • Target Identification: Antibodies are typically raised against protein epitopes. For Mca1, potential immunogenic regions could include its variable domains or conserved motifs (e.g., zinc-binding sites).

  • Application: If developed, such an antibody could be used for:

    • Western blotting to quantify Mca1 expression.

    • Immunofluorescence to localize Mca1 during meiosis.

    • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to study DNA-binding activity.

Comparative Antibody Research

Relevant methodologies from similar studies include:

Table 1: Antibody Characterization Approaches

MethodApplication ExampleReference Study
Surface Plasmon ResonanceKinetics of antibody-antigen bindingLiu et al. (2015)
X-ray CrystallographyStructural epitope mappingVenugopalan et al. (2023)
Cryo-EMVisualizing antibody-virus interactionsLi et al. (2023)

Potential Challenges

  • Epitope Accessibility: Mca1’s regulatory domains may be structurally shielded, complicating antibody development .

  • Cross-Reactivity: Zinc binuclear cluster proteins share conserved motifs, risking off-target binding .

Future Directions

  • Immunogen Design: Peptide sequences from Mca1’s transactivation domain (residues 450-600) could prioritize unique regions .

  • Functional Assays: Neutralization assays (e.g., yeast complementation) would validate antibody efficacy in restoring mfc1 expression in SPAPB1A11.04cΔ strains .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPAPB1A11.04c; Uncharacterized transcriptional regulatory protein PB1A11.04c
Target Names
SPAPB1A11.04c
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Nucleus membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the function of SPAPB1A11.04c (Dhp1) in S. pombe?

SPAPB1A11.04c encodes Dhp1, a conserved exoribonuclease that couples pre-mRNA 3′-end processing to transcription. Research has demonstrated that Dhp1 plays critical roles in several cellular processes, including:

  • Premature transcription termination of meiotic genes

  • Heterochromatin assembly at meiotic gene loci during vegetative growth

  • Silencing of DSR (Determinant of Selective Removal)-containing meiotic transcripts

  • Maintaining proper RNA processing and cellular differentiation

Experimental evidence shows that Dhp1 mutants exhibit significant stabilization of meiotic gene transcripts such as ssm4, with accumulation levels comparable to those observed in rrp6Δ mutants. This indicates Dhp1 is a key conserved factor required for silencing DSR-containing meiotic transcripts .

How does Dhp1 differ from its homologs in other organisms?

Dhp1 in S. pombe is homologous to Rat1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Xrn2 in mammals. While these proteins share the core exoribonuclease function, there are organism-specific differences:

OrganismProteinKnown Interacting PartnersSpecific Functions
S. pombeDhp1Mmi1, Mtl1, MTREC complex, ClrC componentsMeiotic gene silencing, heterochromatin formation
S. cerevisiaeRat1Rai1, Rtt103Transcription termination, rRNA processing
MammalsXrn2SETX, p54nrbTranscription termination, miRNA processing

Unlike its S. cerevisiae homolog that collaborates with Rai1 and Rtt103 proteins (related to Din1 and Rhn1 in S. pombe), research has shown that neither din1Δ nor rhn1Δ mutants caused stabilization of ssm4 transcripts as observed in dhp1-2 mutants. This indicates that Dhp1's function in meiotic gene silencing is not shared with these auxiliary factors .

What techniques are typically used to study Dhp1 function?

Research on Dhp1 typically employs several complementary techniques:

  • Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and RT-qPCR to analyze transcript levels

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to assess protein-DNA interactions and chromatin modifications

  • Co-immunoprecipitation to identify protein-protein interactions

  • Western blotting for protein expression analysis

  • Genetic assays using temperature-sensitive mutants (e.g., dhp1-1, dhp1-2)

  • Sporulation assays to assess meiotic progression

For instance, researchers have used ChIP analyses to demonstrate that H3K9me levels were significantly reduced at the ssm4 locus in dhp1-2 mutants, indicating Dhp1's role in heterochromatin formation .

What are the critical considerations when developing antibodies against Dhp1?

When developing antibodies against Dhp1, researchers should consider:

  • Epitope selection: The N-terminus of Dhp1 has been successfully used as an antigenic target. As described in research studies, anti-Dhp1 antibodies have been obtained through affinity purification from rabbit anti-Dhp1 antiserum raised against peptide antigens corresponding to the N-terminus of Dhp1 .

  • Specificity validation: Given the conserved nature of Dhp1/Rat1/Xrn2 proteins, cross-reactivity must be thoroughly assessed, particularly in studies involving multiple species.

  • Post-translational modifications: Consider whether the antibody should recognize modified forms of the protein, as these may be functionally important.

  • Application compatibility: Validate the antibody for specific applications (Western blotting, ChIP, immunofluorescence) using appropriate controls.

Research has shown that antibodies against the N-terminal region of Dhp1 work effectively in immunoprecipitation and Western blot applications .

How can researchers verify the specificity of a Dhp1 antibody?

Thorough validation is essential for antibody specificity. For Dhp1 antibodies, consider:

  • Genetic controls: Use dhp1 deletion strains or temperature-sensitive mutants (dhp1-1, dhp1-2) as negative controls.

  • Epitope tagging: Compare antibody recognition with tagged versions of Dhp1 (e.g., MYC-tagged Dhp1).

  • Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to verify specific binding.

  • Cross-species reactivity: Test against recombinant Dhp1 from multiple species to assess conservation and specificity.

  • Mass spectrometry verification: Confirm that immunoprecipitated proteins are indeed Dhp1 through mass spectrometry analysis, as demonstrated in research where mass spectrometry specifically identified Dhp1 and its known interacting partners in purified fractions .

What controls should be included when using Dhp1 antibodies in experiments?

Every experiment using Dhp1 antibodies should include appropriate controls:

  • Positive controls: Wild-type S. pombe cells expressing normal levels of Dhp1.

  • Negative controls: When possible, use dhp1 conditional mutants (temperature-sensitive strains like dhp1-2) cultured at restrictive temperature.

  • Input controls: For immunoprecipitation experiments, analyze a portion of the input material to confirm Dhp1 presence.

  • Non-specific antibody controls: Include isotype-matched irrelevant antibodies.

  • Benzonase treatment: For protein-protein interaction studies, treat samples with Benzonase (250 U) for 30 minutes at room temperature to ensure RNA/DNA-independent interactions, as demonstrated in research showing that Dhp1 coimmunoprecipitates with Mtl1 even after Benzonase treatment .

How can Dhp1 antibodies be used to study protein-protein interactions?

Dhp1 has been shown to interact with multiple protein complexes involved in RNA processing and heterochromatin formation. To study these interactions:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation:

    • Lyse cells in appropriate buffer (typically containing 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, and protease inhibitors)

    • Clarify lysates by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 1 hour

    • Incubate supernatant with antibody-coupled beads

    • Wash extensively and elute proteins for analysis

  • Specific considerations:

    • Use Benzonase treatment to eliminate DNA/RNA-mediated interactions

    • Consider tagged versions of potential interacting partners for reciprocal co-IPs

    • Analyze results using mass spectrometry for unbiased identification

Research has successfully identified Dhp1 interactions with several proteins including Mtl1, Mmi1, and components of the ClrC complex through such approaches .

What is the recommended protocol for using Dhp1 antibodies in ChIP experiments?

For chromatin immunoprecipitation using Dhp1 antibodies:

  • Cross-link S. pombe cells with 1% formaldehyde for 15-30 minutes

  • Lyse cells and sonicate to generate DNA fragments (~200-500 bp)

  • Immunoprecipitate using anti-Dhp1 antibodies (5-10 μg per sample)

  • Wash extensively to remove non-specific binding

  • Reverse cross-links and purify DNA

  • Analyze by qPCR, ChIP-chip, or ChIP-seq

When designing ChIP experiments, focus on regions where Dhp1 is known to act:

  • Meiotic gene loci (e.g., ssm4)

  • Heterochromatin islands

  • 3' ends of genes where transcription termination occurs

Research has successfully employed ChIP-chip using custom 4 × 44K oligonucleotide arrays (Agilent) to analyze Dhp1 binding patterns and associated chromatin modifications .

How can Dhp1 antibodies be used to study transcription termination?

Dhp1's role in transcription termination can be investigated through:

  • ChIP-qPCR analysis:

    • Design primers spanning the 3' ends of genes and downstream regions

    • Compare Dhp1 occupancy in wild-type vs. mutant backgrounds

    • Correlate with RNA polymerase II occupancy and transcript levels

  • 3' RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends):

    • Use Dhp1 antibodies to immunoprecipitate Dhp1-associated RNAs

    • Perform 3' RACE to identify termination sites

    • Compare between wild-type and mutant conditions

  • Strand-specific RT-PCR:

    • Design primers to detect read-through transcripts

    • Perform strand-specific RT-PCR using the OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen)

    • Quantify using real-time RT-qPCR with the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen)

These approaches have been successfully employed to demonstrate Dhp1's role in preventing read-through transcription and premature termination of meiotic genes .

What are common issues when using Dhp1 antibodies and how can they be resolved?

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
Weak signal in Western blotsLow Dhp1 expression, antibody degradationUse temperature-sensitive mutants at permissive temperature as positive controls; optimize antibody concentration; use fresh antibody
High backgroundNon-specific binding, excessive antibodyIncrease blocking time; reduce antibody concentration; use more stringent washing
Failed co-IPDisrupted protein interactionsTry milder lysis conditions; avoid ionic detergents; use chemical cross-linking
Inconsistent ChIP resultsInefficient cross-linking, chromatin accessibilityOptimize cross-linking time; ensure proper sonication; verify antibody efficiency in ChIP

When troubleshooting, consider that experimental conditions established for studying Dhp1 mutants typically involve growing cells at 30°C (permissive temperature) to early logarithmic phase before shifting to 37°C (restrictive temperature) for 5 hours .

How should data from Dhp1 antibody experiments be normalized and analyzed?

For robust data analysis:

  • Western blot quantification:

    • Normalize Dhp1 signal to loading controls (e.g., actin, tubulin)

    • Use at least three biological replicates

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests (e.g., t-test, ANOVA)

  • ChIP data analysis:

    • Calculate percent input or fold enrichment over control regions

    • Compare enrichment between experimental conditions

    • For genome-wide studies, apply normalization methods suitable for ChIP-seq/ChIP-chip

  • RT-qPCR analysis:

    • Use appropriate reference genes for normalization

    • Apply the ΔΔCt method or similar approaches

    • Validate with multiple primer sets

When analyzing Dhp1 function at heterochromatin regions, include H3K9me2 ChIP data as a functional readout, as research has shown that H3K9me levels are significantly reduced at specific loci in dhp1-2 mutants .

How can researchers differentiate between direct and indirect effects when studying Dhp1 function?

Distinguishing direct from indirect effects requires:

  • Temporal analyses:

    • Use rapid inactivation systems (e.g., temperature-sensitive mutants)

    • Perform time-course experiments to identify primary responses

    • Compare early vs. late effects after Dhp1 inactivation

  • Separation of functions:

    • Create domain-specific mutants that disrupt specific Dhp1 activities

    • Assess phenotypic consequences of each mutation

    • Correlate molecular defects with functional outcomes

  • Context-specific analyses:

    • Compare Dhp1 function across different genomic contexts

    • Analyze Dhp1 mutants in backgrounds lacking interacting partners

    • Use epistasis analyses to place Dhp1 in functional pathways

Research has successfully used temperature-sensitive dhp1-2 mutants to study acute effects of Dhp1 inactivation and has employed double mutant analyses (e.g., ago1Δ dhp1-2) to reveal parallel functions in heterochromatin formation .

How can Dhp1 antibodies be used to study its role in heterochromatin formation?

Dhp1 has been implicated in heterochromatin assembly at various genomic loci. Advanced research approaches include:

  • Sequential ChIP (ChIP-reChIP):

    • First immunoprecipitate with anti-Dhp1 antibodies

    • Perform second immunoprecipitation with antibodies against heterochromatin marks (H3K9me2/3)

    • Analyze co-occupancy at specific loci

  • Genetic interaction studies:

    • Combine dhp1 mutations with deletions of RNAi components (e.g., ago1Δ)

    • Assess heterochromatin formation using silencing assays

    • Measure H3K9me levels using ChIP-qPCR

  • Functional readouts:

    • Silencing assays using reporter genes (e.g., ura4+)

    • Haploid meiosis assessment using iodine staining

    • Microscopy analysis of heterochromatin organization

Research has demonstrated that dhp1-2 cells show defects in silencing at the mat locus, and ago1Δ dhp1-2 double mutants display cumulative silencing defects, indicating parallel pathways in heterochromatin formation .

What approaches can be used to study the dynamics of Dhp1 interactions during cellular responses?

Understanding the dynamics of Dhp1 interactions requires:

  • Time-resolved analyses:

    • Synchronize cells and collect samples at defined timepoints

    • Perform co-IP with Dhp1 antibodies followed by mass spectrometry

    • Quantify changes in interaction partners

  • Stimulus-specific responses:

    • Subject cells to different stresses (temperature shift, nutrient limitation)

    • Compare Dhp1 interactomes under different conditions

    • Correlate with functional outcomes

  • Spatial organization:

    • Use immunofluorescence to track Dhp1 localization

    • Perform proximity ligation assays to detect in situ interactions

    • Correlate with cellular compartmentalization

Research has shown that Dhp1 interactions with factors like Mmi1 and MTREC are crucial for targeting meiotic genes for premature transcription termination and heterochromatin-mediated silencing .

How can researchers investigate the mechanistic interplay between Dhp1 and RNA processing machinery?

The complex relationship between Dhp1 and RNA processing requires sophisticated approaches:

  • In vitro reconstitution:

    • Purify recombinant Dhp1 and interaction partners

    • Assemble minimal functional complexes

    • Test activities using defined RNA substrates

  • Structure-function analyses:

    • Generate domain-specific mutations in Dhp1

    • Assess impact on different activities (exonuclease, protein interactions)

    • Correlate with phenotypic consequences

  • RNA-centric approaches:

    • Perform CLIP-seq (cross-linking immunoprecipitation) with Dhp1 antibodies

    • Map Dhp1 binding sites on cellular RNAs

    • Correlate with RNA fate (processing, degradation, silencing)

Research has revealed that Dhp1 associates with RNA elimination factors and is part of a larger protein network that targets meiotic genes for premature transcription termination and heterochromatin-mediated silencing, suggesting direct cross-talk between 3′-end processing and heterochromatin machinery .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.