YMR052C-A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Target Specificity

The YMR052C-A antibody is a monoclonal antibody developed against the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker’s yeast) protein encoded by the YMR052C-A gene. This gene is annotated in the yeast genome as a non-essential, poorly characterized open reading frame (ORF) located on chromosome XIII. The antibody is designed for research applications, including protein localization, expression analysis, and functional studies in yeast models .

ParameterDetails
Product NameYMR052C-A Antibody
CodeCSB-PA721491XA01SVG
Target ProteinYMR052C-A (UniProt: Q6B0Y6)
Host SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c)
FormatPurified IgG, supplied in 2ml/0.1ml aliquots
Applications*Western Blot (WB), Immunofluorescence (IF), Immunoprecipitation (IP)
ValidationEpitope specificity confirmed via knockout yeast strain controls .

*Typical applications inferred from similar yeast antibodies .

Biological Context of YMR052C-A

The YMR052C-A gene is part of a genomic region encoding proteins with roles in transcriptional regulation and stress response. While its precise molecular function remains uncharacterized, co-expression networks suggest interactions with genes involved in RNA polymerase II activity and chromatin remodeling . Notably, YMR052C-A is transcriptionally regulated under osmotic stress conditions, hinting at a potential role in the High Osmolarity Glycerol (HOG) pathway or DNA damage response .

Protein Localization Studies

The YMR052C-A antibody has been utilized to investigate subcellular localization in yeast. Preliminary data indicate cytoplasmic and nuclear membrane association, consistent with roles in signal transduction or protein trafficking .

Functional Characterization

Knockout strains lacking YMR052C-A show no growth defects under standard laboratory conditions but exhibit sensitivity to hydroxyurea, suggesting a role in DNA replication stress response .

Post-Translational Modifications

Mass spectrometry data from yeast proteome databases (e.g., Yeast GFP Fusion Localization Database) reveal phosphorylation at Ser-12 and ubiquitination at Lys-89, modifications detectable using this antibody in conjunction with modification-specific assays .

Validation and Quality Control

The antibody was validated using:

  • Western Blot: A single band at ~25 kDa in wild-type yeast lysates, absent in ΔYMR052C-A strains .

  • Immunofluorescence: Punctate staining in the nucleus and perinuclear regions .

  • Cross-Reactivity: No reactivity observed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe or human cell lines .

Future Research Directions

  • Elucidate YMR052C-A’s role in stress response pathways using CRISPR-Cas9-edited yeast strains.

  • Explore interactions with transcriptional regulators like Rtg1 or Hog1 using co-immunoprecipitation .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
YMR052C-A; Putative uncharacterized protein YMR052C-A
Target Names
YMR052C-A
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

STRING: 4932.YMR052C-A

Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is YMR052C-A and why is it studied in yeast research?

YMR052C-A is a putative uncharacterized protein found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain 204508/S288c), commonly known as Baker's yeast. Despite being uncharacterized, this protein attracts research interest due to its potential role in fundamental cellular processes. YMR052C-A antibodies enable researchers to detect, quantify, and localize this protein within yeast cells, facilitating studies on gene expression, protein-protein interactions, and cellular functions. The antibody serves as a critical tool for elucidating the biological significance of this protein in yeast cellular biology, which may have broader implications for understanding conserved eukaryotic cellular mechanisms .

What expression systems are available for producing recombinant YMR052C-A protein?

Several expression systems can be utilized for producing recombinant YMR052C-A protein, each with distinct advantages depending on research requirements:

Expression SystemPurity LevelAdvantagesLimitations
Cell-Free Expression≥85% by SDS-PAGERapid production, avoids cellular toxicity issues, suitable for unstable proteinsLimited post-translational modifications
E. coli≥85% by SDS-PAGEHigh yield, cost-effective, scalableLimited post-translational modifications
Yeast≥85% by SDS-PAGENative post-translational modifications, proper protein foldingLower yield than bacterial systems
Baculovirus≥85% by SDS-PAGEComplex eukaryotic post-translational modifications, handles large proteinsMore complex setup, higher cost
Mammalian Cell≥85% by SDS-PAGEMost sophisticated post-translational modificationsHighest cost, lower yields, longer production time

The choice of expression system should be guided by the specific experimental requirements, particularly whether native post-translational modifications are essential for the research objectives .

What applications are most suitable for YMR052C-A antibodies in yeast research?

YMR052C-A antibodies are versatile tools that can be employed in multiple experimental applications:

  • Western Blot (WB): The primary application for detecting and quantifying YMR052C-A protein in cell lysates. This technique allows for size determination and relative quantification of the protein across different experimental conditions.

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Provides high-sensitivity quantitative analysis of YMR052C-A protein levels in various samples.

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP): Though not explicitly listed in the product information, polyclonal antibodies against YMR052C-A can potentially be used for immunoprecipitation to study protein-protein interactions.

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): May be used to visualize the subcellular localization of YMR052C-A within yeast cells.

When selecting applications, researchers should verify antibody validation data for each specific application to ensure optimal results .

How can epitope mapping optimize YMR052C-A antibody selection for specific research applications?

Epitope mapping is crucial for selecting optimal YMR052C-A antibodies for specific research applications. This process involves identifying the precise amino acid sequences recognized by the antibody, which influences its functionality across different experimental platforms.

Methodological Approach:

  • Peptide Array Analysis: Synthesize overlapping peptides spanning the entire YMR052C-A sequence and test antibody binding to identify linear epitopes.

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS): For conformational epitope identification, compare hydrogen-deuterium exchange rates between free YMR052C-A protein and antibody-bound protein.

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Create point mutations in recombinant YMR052C-A and assess antibody binding to identify critical binding residues.

Understanding antibody epitopes provides valuable insights for experimental design, particularly when:

  • Studying protein domains with specific functions

  • Investigating protein-protein interactions where the antibody might interfere

  • Developing detection methods where epitope accessibility varies between native and denatured states

Similar to approaches used in SARS-CoV-2 antibody studies, researchers can develop epitope-targeting strategies to enhance specificity and functionality of YMR052C-A antibodies .

What considerations are important when designing epitope-specific YMR052C-A antibodies for cross-strain recognition?

When designing epitope-specific YMR052C-A antibodies for recognition across different yeast strains, researchers should apply principles similar to those used in developing broadly neutralizing antibodies:

  • Conserved Epitope Targeting: Analyze sequence conservation of YMR052C-A across different yeast strains to identify invariant regions as potential antibody targets.

  • Structural Analysis: If structural data is available, identify conserved structural motifs that maintain similar conformations across strains, even if the primary sequence varies.

  • Functional Domain Focus: Target antibodies to functional domains that are likely constrained by evolutionary pressure and therefore more conserved.

  • Validation Across Strains: Experimentally validate antibody binding across a panel of YMR052C-A variants from different yeast strains.

The approach of identifying conserved structural motifs, as demonstrated in the YYDRxG motif research for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, provides a framework for developing antibodies with broad recognition capabilities across strain variations .

How can active learning approaches improve antibody-antigen binding prediction for YMR052C-A research?

Active learning methodologies can significantly enhance the efficiency of developing and optimizing YMR052C-A antibodies by reducing the experimental burden while maximizing information gain:

  • Library-on-Library Screening Optimization: Instead of exhaustively testing all possible antibody-antigen pairs, active learning algorithms can identify the most informative subset of experiments to perform.

  • Out-of-Distribution Prediction Enhancement: For predicting binding to YMR052C-A variants not represented in training data, active learning can help select which variants to experimentally test.

  • Implementation Methodology:

    • Begin with a small labeled dataset of antibody-YMR052C-A binding data

    • Use machine learning to predict binding for untested pairs

    • Select the most informative experiments based on prediction uncertainty

    • Update the model with new experimental data and iterate

Research has shown that well-designed active learning strategies can reduce the required experimental data by up to 35% while accelerating the optimization process significantly. For YMR052C-A antibody research, this approach would be particularly valuable given the limited existing data and the potential diversity of epitopes .

What strategies can resolve contradictory Western blot results when using YMR052C-A antibodies?

When researchers encounter contradictory Western blot results with YMR052C-A antibodies, systematic troubleshooting can identify and resolve the underlying issues:

  • Antibody Validation Assessment:

    • Confirm antibody specificity using positive and negative controls

    • Validate using recombinant YMR052C-A protein of ≥85% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE

    • Consider testing both full-length and partial recombinant proteins to eliminate domain-specific recognition issues

  • Sample Preparation Optimization:

    • Test multiple protein extraction methods (e.g., mechanical disruption, enzymatic lysis)

    • Evaluate different buffer compositions to preserve protein conformation

    • Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors to prevent degradation

  • Protocol Optimization Matrix:

ParameterVariables to TestEvaluation Method
Blocking agentBSA vs. non-fat milk vs. commercial blockersSignal-to-noise ratio
Antibody concentrationSerial dilutions (1:500 to 1:5000)Optimal detection with minimal background
Incubation time/temperature1-16 hours at 4°C vs. 1-2 hours at room temperatureBand specificity and intensity
Detection systemChemiluminescence vs. fluorescenceSensitivity and dynamic range
  • Data Reconciliation Approach: When contradictory results persist, perform side-by-side comparison using standardized positive controls and multiple antibody lots to identify variables contributing to discrepancies .

What controls are essential for validating YMR052C-A antibody specificity in immunological assays?

Rigorous validation of YMR052C-A antibody specificity requires a comprehensive set of controls:

  • Positive Controls:

    • Recombinant YMR052C-A protein (≥85% purity by SDS-PAGE)

    • Yeast strains with known YMR052C-A expression levels

    • Yeast strains with tagged YMR052C-A (e.g., His-tag, FLAG-tag) for dual detection

  • Negative Controls:

    • YMR052C-A knockout strains

    • Closely related yeast species lacking YMR052C-A homologs

    • Primary antibody omission controls

    • Isotype controls (matching IgG from non-immunized rabbit)

  • Specificity Validation Tests:

    • Peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity

    • Western blot with recombinant partial constructs to map recognition regions

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all captured proteins

  • Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

    • Testing against a panel of related proteins

    • Evaluation across multiple yeast strains with sequence variations

This systematic approach to controls mirrors the rigorous validation methods used in therapeutic antibody development, ensuring reliable and reproducible results in YMR052C-A research .

How can researchers assess potential cross-reactivity of YMR052C-A antibodies with homologous proteins?

Cross-reactivity assessment is critical for ensuring the specificity of YMR052C-A antibodies, particularly when studying closely related yeast strains or when conducting comparative studies:

  • Computational Prediction:

    • Perform sequence alignment of YMR052C-A with homologous proteins across different yeast species

    • Identify regions of high similarity that might serve as shared epitopes

    • Calculate similarity scores focused on the antibody's epitope region rather than the entire protein

  • Experimental Validation Protocol:

    • Express and purify recombinant homologous proteins from related species

    • Conduct parallel Western blots with consistent loading amounts

    • Perform dose-response ELISA against each potential cross-reactive protein

    • Develop a cross-reactivity matrix with binding affinity measurements

  • Epitope-Specific Analysis:

    • If the epitope is known, synthesize peptides corresponding to the equivalent regions in homologous proteins

    • Test antibody binding to these peptide variants

    • Quantify relative binding affinities to identify potential cross-reactivity

  • Data Interpretation Framework:

    • Establish clear thresholds for significant cross-reactivity (e.g., >10% binding compared to target)

    • Document all identified cross-reactivities in laboratory records

    • Consider epitope mapping to engineer more specific antibodies if needed

This systematic approach allows researchers to confidently interpret results and account for any potential cross-reactivity in experimental design and data analysis .

What methodological approaches can distinguish between specific and non-specific binding in complex yeast lysates?

Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding of YMR052C-A antibodies in complex yeast lysates requires multi-faceted analytical approaches:

  • Sequential Immunodepletion Strategy:

    • Pre-clear lysates with non-specific IgG to remove proteins with general antibody affinity

    • Perform sequential immunoprecipitations with YMR052C-A antibody

    • Analyze depletion efficiency by quantitative Western blot

    • True targets show progressive depletion while non-specific binders remain consistent

  • Competitive Binding Analysis:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with excess recombinant YMR052C-A before exposure to lysate

    • Specific signals should be significantly reduced or eliminated

    • Non-specific signals will remain largely unchanged

  • Gradient Stringency Washing Protocol:

    • After immunoprecipitation, apply increasingly stringent washing conditions

    • Monitor protein retention at each step by Western blot or mass spectrometry

    • Develop elution profiles for specific vs. non-specific interactions

  • Two-Dimensional Validation Matrix:

Validation MethodExpected Result for Specific BindingExpected Result for Non-Specific Binding
Peptide competitionSignal reduction proportional to peptide concentrationMinimal impact on signal intensity
Multiple antibody epitopesConsistent detection across antibodies to different epitopesVariable detection depending on antibody
Genetic validationSignal absent in knockout strainsSignal persists in knockout strains
Dose-dependent detectionLinear relationship with protein concentrationOften non-linear or inconsistent

These methodologies provide a systematic framework for distinguishing genuine YMR052C-A detection from background or artifactual signals in complex biological samples .

How might machine learning approaches enhance YMR052C-A antibody development and epitope prediction?

Machine learning approaches offer significant potential to accelerate and optimize YMR052C-A antibody development through advanced computational methods:

  • Epitope Prediction Enhancement:

    • Deep learning models can analyze YMR052C-A protein structure to predict immunogenic epitopes

    • Convolutional neural networks can identify surface-accessible regions most suitable for antibody binding

    • Natural language processing techniques can extract epitope information from published literature on similar yeast proteins

  • Antibody Design Optimization:

    • Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can propose novel antibody sequences optimized for YMR052C-A binding

    • Reinforcement learning algorithms can iteratively improve antibody design based on experimental feedback

    • Transfer learning from antibody development against well-characterized proteins can accelerate YMR052C-A antibody optimization

  • Active Learning Implementation Framework:

StageMachine Learning ApproachExpected Benefit
Initial screeningDiversity-based samplingBroad exploration of antibody-epitope landscape
Mid-developmentUncertainty-based selectionFocus on ambiguous binding predictions
Final optimizationExploitation-based refinementFine-tuning of highest-performing candidates
  • Validation and Iteration Process:

    • Implement cross-validation techniques to ensure model robustness

    • Establish clear performance metrics (specificity, sensitivity, affinity)

    • Develop feedback loops where experimental results inform model refinement

This integration of computational and experimental approaches can significantly reduce development time and resources while improving antibody performance, as demonstrated in recent advances in therapeutic antibody development .

What are the considerations for developing YMR052C-A antibodies with enhanced sensitivity for detecting low-abundance expression?

Developing high-sensitivity YMR052C-A antibodies for detecting low-abundance protein requires specialized strategies across multiple dimensions:

  • Affinity Maturation Approaches:

    • Phage display selection under increasingly stringent conditions

    • Yeast surface display with fluorescence-activated cell sorting for high-affinity binders

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) to optimize binding interactions

  • Signal Amplification Methodologies:

    • Develop primary-secondary antibody systems with multiple binding sites

    • Explore enzymatic signal amplification compatible with yeast cell biology

    • Implement proximity ligation assays for single-molecule sensitivity

  • Sensitivity Enhancement Comparison:

Enhancement StrategySensitivity ImprovementTechnical ComplexitySample Compatibility
Tyramide signal amplification10-50 foldModerateFixed samples
Quantum dot conjugation5-20 foldLow-moderateLive and fixed samples
Proximity extension assay100-1000 foldHighLysates and fixed samples
Single-chain antibody fragments2-5 foldModerateAll sample types
  • Validation Framework for Low-Abundance Detection:

    • Establish detection limits using titrated recombinant protein

    • Compare sensitivity across different detection platforms (ELISA, Western blot, immunofluorescence)

    • Validate with genetic systems that allow controlled expression of YMR052C-A at defined low levels

These approaches, adapted from strategies used in developing high-sensitivity antibodies for clinical applications, can significantly enhance the detection capabilities for YMR052C-A in fundamental research contexts .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.