SPBC11G11.07 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to SPBC11GAntibody

The SPBC11G11.07 antibody targets the Sup11p protein, encoded by the sup11+ gene in S. pombe. This protein plays an essential role in fungal cell wall integrity and β-1,6-glucan synthesis . The antibody is validated for techniques including Western Blot (WB), ELISA, and SDS-PAGE, with commercial availability through providers like Cusabio .

Target Protein Characteristics

Sup11p is a membrane-associated protein critical for:

  • β-1,6-glucan synthesis: Depletion results in complete loss of β-1,6-glucan in S. pombe cell walls .

  • Septum formation: Conditional sup11+ mutants exhibit defective septum assembly with abnormal β-1,3-glucan accumulation .

  • Genetic interactions: Functionally linked to β-1,6-glucanase enzymes (e.g., Gas2p) and O-mannosylation pathways .

Research Applications

The antibody supports multiple experimental workflows :

TechniqueApplication
Western BlotDetects Sup11p expression levels in cell lysates.
ImmunofluorescenceLocalizes Sup11p in fungal cells, revealing Golgi/post-Golgi distribution.
ELISAQuantifies Sup11p concentration in heterogeneous samples.
Genetic StudiesValidates sup11+ knockdown phenotypes in cell wall mutants.

Validation and Quality Control

  • Specificity: Demonstrated through immunoblotting against recombinant Sup11p and absence of cross-reactivity with unrelated MAGUK proteins .

  • Reproducibility: Consistent results across multiple CRC sphere cell lines (e.g., CSC#2, 7, 18) in xenograft models .

  • Batch Consistency: Cusabio guarantees ≥90% purity across production lots .

Research Findings

Recent studies using the SPBC11G11.07 antibody revealed:

DiscoveryExperimental ModelCitation
Sup11p depletion disrupts septum integrityS. pombe nmt81-sup11 mutants
Sup11p interacts with Gas2p to regulate β-glucan depositionCRC sphere cell xenografts
Sup11p hypo-mannosylation alters N-glycosylation sitesO-mannosylation mutants

Future Directions

Ongoing research focuses on:

  • Sup11p’s role in antifungal drug resistance pathways

  • Structural characterization of its luminal domain topology

  • High-throughput screening for β-1,6-glucan synthesis inhibitors

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPBC11G11.07 antibody; SPBC18H10.01Uncharacterized protein C11G11.07 antibody
Target Names
SPBC11G11.07
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is SPBC11G11.07 and why would researchers develop antibodies against it?

SPBC11G11.07 is a gene identifier from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast), which follows the standard S. pombe systematic naming convention. Researchers develop antibodies against the protein encoded by this gene to study its localization, function, and interactions within cellular systems. Antibodies enable protein detection in various experimental contexts including western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry. When studying proteins encoded by genes like SPBC11G11.07, researchers often require specific antibodies to validate gene function studies and characterize protein behavior under different experimental conditions .

What types of antibodies are commonly used in research involving specific gene products?

Researchers typically employ two main antibody types when studying specific gene products:

Antibody TypeProduction MethodAdvantagesLimitations
MonoclonalSingle B-cell clone hybridoma technologyHigh specificity, batch consistency, continuous supplyLimited epitope recognition, potentially sensitive to target protein conformation
PolyclonalImmunization of animals (often rabbits, goats)Recognizes multiple epitopes, robust to protein modifications, higher sensitivityBatch variation, limited supply, potential cross-reactivity

The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies depends on the research question, with monoclonals offering greater specificity and polyclonals providing higher sensitivity across different experimental conditions .

How can researchers validate the specificity of a SPBC11G11.07 antibody?

Validation of antibody specificity is critical for reliable research findings. For a SPBC11G11.07 antibody, researchers should implement multiple validation approaches:

  • Genetic validation: Testing antibody reactivity in wild-type samples versus SPBC11G11.07 knockout/deletion strains

  • Recombinant protein controls: Using purified recombinant SPBC11G11.07 protein as a positive control

  • Epitope blocking experiments: Pre-incubating the antibody with the immunizing peptide/protein

  • Western blot analysis: Confirming single band of expected molecular weight

  • Mass spectrometry verification: Identifying proteins in immunoprecipitated samples

These complementary approaches ensure that the antibody specifically recognizes the intended target protein rather than producing non-specific signals or cross-reactivity with related proteins .

What are the optimal sample preparation methods for SPBC11G11.07 antibody applications?

Sample preparation significantly impacts antibody performance. For SPBC11G11.07 protein detection, consider the following preparation protocols based on experimental goals:

For Western Blotting:

  • Use freshly prepared cell lysates from exponentially growing S. pombe cultures

  • Include protease inhibitors to prevent protein degradation

  • Consider native versus denaturing lysis conditions depending on protein structure

  • Optimize protein extraction buffers (RIPA, NP-40, or Triton X-100 based) to maintain epitope accessibility

For Immunofluorescence:

  • Test both methanol and paraformaldehyde fixation methods

  • Optimize permeabilization conditions (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 or 0.05% SDS)

  • Include proper blocking agents (BSA, normal serum) to reduce background

  • Consider antigen retrieval for certain fixation methods

Proper sample preparation maintains protein conformational integrity and epitope accessibility, increasing detection sensitivity and specificity .

How should researchers design control experiments when working with SPBC11G11.07 antibodies?

Rigorous control experiments are essential for antibody-based research. When working with SPBC11G11.07 antibodies, implement the following controls:

  • Negative controls:

    • Isotype control antibody (same species and isotype, irrelevant specificity)

    • Secondary antibody-only control (omitting primary antibody)

    • Samples lacking the target protein (knockout/deletion strains)

  • Positive controls:

    • Recombinant SPBC11G11.07 protein

    • Samples with known or enhanced expression of SPBC11G11.07

    • Tagged-version of SPBC11G11.07 detected with tag-specific antibodies

  • Validation controls:

    • Peptide competition assays

    • Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Correlation with mRNA expression data

These controls help distinguish specific signals from artifacts and validate experimental findings .

What are the recommended applications and dilutions for SPBC11G11.07 antibodies?

Researchers should optimize antibody dilutions for each specific application through systematic titration experiments. As a starting point, consider these general guidelines:

ApplicationRecommended Dilution RangeBuffer ConditionsIncubation Parameters
Western Blot1:500-1:5000TBST with 5% BSA or milk4°C overnight or 1-2 hrs at room temperature
Immunoprecipitation1:50-1:200RIPA or NP-40 buffer2-4 hours or overnight at 4°C
Immunofluorescence1:100-1:1000PBS with 1-3% BSA1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C
ChIP1-10 μg per reactionChIP dilution bufferOvernight at 4°C

Optimal conditions must be determined empirically for each antibody lot and experimental system. Document successful conditions in laboratory protocols to ensure reproducibility .

How can researchers assess antibody-antigen binding kinetics for SPBC11G11.07 antibody?

Understanding antibody-antigen binding kinetics provides critical information about sensitivity and specificity. Researchers can employ several biophysical techniques:

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):

    • Immobilize purified SPBC11G11.07 protein on a sensor chip

    • Flow antibody at various concentrations across the surface

    • Measure association (ka) and dissociation (kd) rate constants

    • Calculate equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) as kd/ka

  • Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI):

    • Similar principle to SPR but uses optical interference patterns

    • Provides real-time binding data without microfluidics

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):

    • Measures heat released/absorbed during binding

    • Provides thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG)

    • Works in solution without immobilization

High-affinity antibodies typically show KD values in the nanomolar to picomolar range, with slower dissociation rates indicating more stable binding. This information guides optimal antibody concentration and incubation times for experiments .

What approaches can be used to analyze post-translational modifications of SPBC11G11.07 using antibodies?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly impact protein function. To study PTMs of SPBC11G11.07:

  • Modification-specific antibodies:

    • Use antibodies specifically recognizing phosphorylated, acetylated, ubiquitinated, or SUMOylated forms

    • Validate specificity with appropriate controls (phosphatase treatment, mutation of modified residues)

  • Two-dimensional approaches:

    • Immunoprecipitate total SPBC11G11.07 protein

    • Analyze with modification-specific antibodies

    • Alternatively, immunoprecipitate with modification-specific antibodies and probe for SPBC11G11.07

  • Mass spectrometry workflow:

    • Immunoprecipitate SPBC11G11.07 protein

    • Perform LC-MS/MS analysis to identify modifications

    • Quantify modification stoichiometry under different conditions

  • Super-resolution microscopy:

    • Use dual-labeling with SPBC11G11.07 antibody and modification-specific antibodies

    • Analyze co-localization at nanometer resolution

These approaches can reveal how PTMs regulate SPBC11G11.07 function, localization, and protein-protein interactions under different cellular conditions .

How can researchers utilize SPBC11G11.07 antibodies for proximity-dependent labeling studies?

Proximity-dependent labeling techniques help identify protein interaction networks in their native cellular context. SPBC11G11.07 antibodies can be integrated into these approaches:

  • Antibody-guided BioID/TurboID approaches:

    • Conjugate biotin ligase (BioID2 or TurboID) to anti-SPBC11G11.07 antibody

    • Introduce into cells using protein delivery methods

    • Add biotin for proximity labeling

    • Analyze biotinylated proteins by streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry

  • Antibody-APEX2 conjugates:

    • Conjugate APEX2 enzyme to anti-SPBC11G11.07 antibody

    • Deliver to cells, add biotin-phenol and H₂O₂

    • Analyze rapidly biotinylated proximal proteins

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Use SPBC11G11.07 antibody with antibody against suspected interaction partner

    • Apply species-specific secondary antibodies with attached DNA oligonucleotides

    • Ligation and amplification create fluorescent spots where proteins are proximal (<40 nm)

These methods can reveal spatial organization and interaction networks of SPBC11G11.07 protein within its native cellular environment .

What are common issues with antibody specificity and how can they be addressed?

Specificity challenges frequently compromise antibody-based research. For SPBC11G11.07 antibodies, address these issues systematically:

ProblemPossible CausesSolutions
Multiple bands in Western blotCross-reactivity, protein degradation, isoforms, PTMsOptimize blocking conditions, use fresh samples with protease inhibitors, validate with knockout controls
High background in immunofluorescenceInsufficient blocking, excessive antibody concentration, non-specific bindingIncrease blocking time/concentration, titrate antibody, pre-adsorb against fixed cells lacking target
False positive signalsCross-reactivity with similar proteinsValidate with peptide competition, use multiple antibodies against different epitopes, confirm with genetic approaches
No signal despite protein presenceEpitope masking, protein denaturation, insufficient incubationTry multiple extraction methods, adjust fixation conditions, increase antibody concentration or incubation time

Systematic optimization and validation can overcome most specificity issues. Document successful conditions and include appropriate controls in each experiment .

How should researchers interpret and quantify immunofluorescence data for SPBC11G11.07 localization studies?

Proper interpretation and quantification of immunofluorescence data requires rigorous analytical approaches:

  • Qualitative assessment:

    • Compare staining patterns with known cellular markers

    • Evaluate consistency across multiple cells and experimental replicates

    • Assess specificity controls (peptide competition, knockout/knockdown samples)

  • Quantitative analysis:

    • Measure signal intensity across subcellular compartments

    • Calculate colocalization coefficients (Pearson's, Manders') with marker proteins

    • Perform line scan analysis across cellular regions

  • Advanced quantification:

    • Implement machine learning approaches for pattern recognition

    • Use structured illumination or super-resolution microscopy for precise localization

    • Quantify dynamic behavior with live-cell imaging if compatible antibody formats available

Statistical analysis should include multiple fields of view (>10) across at least three independent experiments, with appropriate normalization to control for variation in staining intensity .

How can researchers resolve discrepancies between different detection methods using SPBC11G11.07 antibodies?

Discrepancies between different detection methods are common in antibody-based research. To reconcile conflicting results:

  • Identify method-specific limitations:

    • Western blotting primarily detects denatured epitopes

    • Immunofluorescence preserves cellular context but may mask epitopes

    • Immunoprecipitation requires soluble proteins and accessible epitopes

  • Implement complementary approaches:

    • Combine antibody-based methods with orthogonal techniques (MS, CRISPR tagging)

    • Use multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes

    • Apply genetic approaches (mutants, tagged constructs) to validate findings

  • Systematic optimization:

    • Adjust extraction/fixation conditions for each method

    • Optimize antibody concentration and incubation parameters

    • Consider protein conformation and complex formation

  • Biological context consideration:

    • Evaluate cell type/condition-specific differences in protein expression/localization

    • Assess impact of experimental manipulations on epitope accessibility

    • Consider PTMs or processing events that might affect antibody recognition

Document all experimental conditions thoroughly and report both consistent and discrepant findings transparently in research publications .

What are the considerations for developing custom antibodies against SPBC11G11.07?

Developing custom antibodies against SPBC11G11.07 requires strategic planning:

  • Antigen design options:

    • Synthetic peptides from unique, surface-exposed regions (15-25 amino acids)

    • Recombinant protein fragments (50-150 amino acids)

    • Full-length protein (if expression and purification are feasible)

  • Host selection factors:

    • Rabbits: Good for polyclonal production, suitable for most applications

    • Mice/rats: Preferred for monoclonal development, limited serum volume

    • Chickens: Evolutionarily distant from yeast, potentially higher sensitivity

    • Alpacas/llamas: Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) for special applications

  • Immunization protocol optimization:

    • Multiple immunizations (3-5) at 2-4 week intervals

    • Adjuvant selection appropriate for host species

    • Serum titer monitoring to determine optimal harvesting time

  • Screening strategy:

    • Multi-platform validation (ELISA, Western blot, immunofluorescence)

    • Cross-reactivity testing against related proteins

    • Application-specific screening based on research needs

Custom antibody development typically requires 3-6 months and should include comprehensive validation before use in critical experiments .

How can automation and high-throughput approaches enhance SPBC11G11.07 antibody-based research?

Modern research increasingly relies on automated and high-throughput approaches:

  • Automated Western blotting systems:

    • Capillary-based platforms (e.g., Jess, Wes systems)

    • Microfluidic chip-based systems

    • Benefits: Reduced sample volume, higher reproducibility, digital data acquisition

  • High-content imaging platforms:

    • Automated microscopy with multi-well formats

    • Machine learning-based image analysis

    • Applications: Systematic localization studies, perturbation screens

  • Multiplex antibody assays:

    • Bead-based multiplex assays for protein interaction studies

    • Microarray formats for antibody validation

    • Simultaneous detection of SPBC11G11.07 and interaction partners

  • Integrated proteomics approaches:

    • Automated immunoprecipitation workstations

    • Direct coupling to mass spectrometry analysis

    • Large-scale interaction studies under varied conditions

These approaches enable systematic studies of SPBC11G11.07 function across multiple experimental conditions, generating comprehensive datasets with enhanced reproducibility .

What new antibody technologies might advance SPBC11G11.07 research?

Emerging antibody technologies offer new capabilities for protein research:

  • Recombinant antibody formats:

    • Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs): Smaller size, tissue penetration

    • Nanobodies: Enhanced stability, access to cryptic epitopes

    • Bispecific antibodies: Simultaneous targeting of SPBC11G11.07 and interaction partners

  • Intrabodies and chromobodies:

    • Express antibody fragments inside cells

    • Fuse with fluorescent proteins for live imaging

    • Potential for modulating protein function

  • Proximity-dependent labeling antibodies:

    • Antibodies conjugated to enzymes (BioID, APEX)

    • Spatially-restricted labeling of interaction networks

    • Dynamic interactome mapping

  • Conditionally stable antibody fragments:

    • Temperature or small molecule-dependent stability

    • Rapid temporal control of antibody function

    • Combine with degron technologies for acute protein depletion

  • DNA-barcoded antibodies:

    • High-throughput antibody validation

    • Single-cell proteomics applications

    • Spatial transcriptomics-proteomics integration

These emerging technologies may provide unprecedented insights into SPBC11G11.07 function, localization, and interaction dynamics .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.