YOL097W-A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to YOL097W-A Antibody

The YOL097W-A Antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised against the recombinant YOL097W-A protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker’s yeast). It is primarily used in yeast biology research for detecting the YOL097W-A protein in experiments such as ELISA and Western blot (WB) . The antibody is stored at -20°C or -80°C and is distributed by Cusabio (Product Code: CSB-PA665577XA01SVG).

Structure and Function

2.1. Antibody Composition
The YOL097W-A Antibody follows the canonical antibody structure:

  • Two heavy chains (IgG isotype) and two light chains linked by disulfide bonds .

  • The Fab fragment binds antigens, while the Fc region interacts with effector cells .

2.2. Target Protein
The YOL097W-A protein is encoded by the YOL097W-A gene in S. cerevisiae. It is localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm, with roles in RNA processing and chromatin remodeling . The antibody specifically recognizes this protein in yeast lysates .

ParameterSpecification
ImmunogenRecombinant S. cerevisiae YOL097W-A protein
Raised InRabbit
ReactivitySaccharomyces cerevisiae (strain S288c)
Tested ApplicationsELISA, WB
Purification MethodAntigen Affinity Purification
ConjugateNon-conjugated

Research Applications

3.1. Yeast Biology Studies

  • The antibody is used to study YOL097W-A’s role in:

    • RNA processing: Interacts with RNA-binding proteins .

    • Chromatin remodeling: Associates with histone-modifying complexes .

  • ELISA is employed for quantifying YOL097W-A levels in yeast lysates .

3.2. Validation Challenges
Recombinant antibodies like YOL097W-A face validation challenges:

  • Specificity: Requires knockout (KO) controls to confirm target binding .

  • Cross-reactivity: Polyclonal antibodies may bind non-target proteins .

Research Findings and Validation

4.1. YCharOS Antibody Characterization
The YCharOS initiative evaluated 614 antibodies (including yeast targets) using KO cells . While YOL097W-A was not directly tested, the framework highlights best practices:

  • WB Validation: Antibodies must show selective binding in wild-type vs. KO lysates .

  • ELISA Sensitivity: Requires optimized protocols to minimize cross-reactivity .

4.2. Genome Database Insights
The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) reports:

  • Expression Patterns: YOL097W-A is upregulated during stress responses .

  • Interactions: Associates with RNA helicases and chromatin assembly factors .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
YOL097W-A antibody; NOL020W antibody; Uncharacterized protein YOL097W-A antibody
Target Names
YOL097W-A
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is YOL097W-A and why is it studied in research?

YOL097W-A is a protein found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast), specifically in strain ATCC 204508/S288c. This protein, cataloged as Q3E7Y9 in UniProt, serves as an important research target for understanding fundamental yeast cellular processes. The study of YOL097W-A contributes to our broader understanding of eukaryotic cell biology, given that S. cerevisiae is a model organism with many conserved pathways relevant to human biology. Research using antibodies against this protein enables visualization and quantification of its expression, localization, and interactions, providing insights into its functional role within yeast cells .

What are the key specifications of commercially available YOL097W-A antibodies?

Commercial YOL097W-A antibodies are typically developed as polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae YOL097W-A protein as the immunogen. These antibodies are generally supplied in liquid form with specific storage buffer compositions for stability. A representative example has the following specifications:

CharacteristicSpecification
Antibody typePolyclonal
Host speciesRabbit
Target speciesSaccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508/S288c)
Tested applicationsELISA, Western Blot
FormLiquid
Purification methodAntigen Affinity Purified
Storage buffer0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4)
Storage conditions-20°C or -80°C (avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles)
IsotypeIgG

These specifications ensure researchers can select appropriate antibodies for their experimental needs and maintain them properly to preserve functionality .

How should Western blot protocols be optimized for YOL097W-A antibody detection?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for YOL097W-A antibody requires systematic adjustment of several parameters:

  • Sample preparation: Extract yeast proteins using mechanical disruption (glass beads) or enzymatic methods (lyticase treatment) in the presence of protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of YOL097W-A.

  • Gel percentage selection: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation of yeast proteins in the expected molecular weight range of YOL097W-A.

  • Transfer conditions: Implement semi-dry transfer at 15V for 30 minutes or wet transfer at 100V for 1 hour using PVDF membranes (0.45μm) for optimal protein binding.

  • Blocking optimization: Block membranes with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature to minimize background signal.

  • Antibody dilution determination: Test serial dilutions (1:500 to 1:5000) of the YOL097W-A antibody to identify the optimal concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background.

  • Controls implementation: Always include both positive controls (wild-type yeast lysate) and negative controls (YOL097W-A knockout strain lysate) to validate antibody specificity.

This methodological approach follows established antibody validation principles, where knockout controls provide the strongest evidence for antibody specificity in Western blot applications .

What immunoprecipitation strategies work best with YOL097W-A antibodies?

For effective immunoprecipitation (IP) of YOL097W-A protein, researchers should employ the following methodological approach:

  • Lysis buffer selection: Use non-denaturing lysis buffers containing 1% NP-40 or Triton X-100, 150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and protease inhibitor cocktail to maintain protein conformation while efficiently extracting YOL097W-A.

  • Pre-clearing step: Pre-clear lysates with Protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C to reduce non-specific binding.

  • Antibody coupling: Incubate 2-5μg of YOL097W-A antibody with Protein A/G beads for 2 hours at room temperature before adding to pre-cleared lysate.

  • Immunoprecipitation conditions: Perform IP overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation to maximize antigen-antibody interaction while minimizing damage to protein complexes.

  • Washing protocol: Conduct 5 sequential washes with decreasing salt concentrations (from 500mM to 150mM NaCl) to remove non-specific binders while preserving specific interactions.

  • Elution method: Elute bound proteins using either low pH (glycine buffer, pH 2.8) followed by immediate neutralization, or by boiling in SDS sample buffer for 5 minutes.

  • Validation: Confirm successful IP using Western blot with a separate validated YOL097W-A antibody that recognizes a different epitope.

The success rate for immunoprecipitation with polyclonal antibodies against yeast proteins is approximately 39%, according to comprehensive antibody validation studies, making thorough validation critical for reliable results .

How can researchers verify the specificity of YOL097W-A antibodies in their experimental system?

Rigorous validation of YOL097W-A antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Genetic validation: Test antibody reactivity against samples from:

    • Wild-type S. cerevisiae (positive control)

    • YOL097W-A knockout strain (negative control)

    • YOL097W-A overexpression strain (enhanced signal expected)

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess purified YOL097W-A peptide (corresponding to the immunogen) before application to samples. Specific binding should be significantly reduced or eliminated.

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related yeast strains or species to evaluate potential cross-reactivity with homologous proteins.

  • Multiple technique concordance: Compare antibody performance across different applications (Western blot, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation) – consistent detection patterns support specificity.

  • Mass spectrometry validation: Perform IP followed by mass spectrometry analysis to confirm the identity of the immunoprecipitated protein.

Research indicates that recombinant antibodies generally show higher specificity (67% success rate in Western blots) compared to traditional monoclonal (41%) or polyclonal (27%) antibodies, making antibody format an important consideration when selecting reagents for highly specific applications .

What are the most common causes of false positive signals when using YOL097W-A antibodies?

False positive signals when using YOL097W-A antibodies can arise from several sources that researchers should systematically address:

  • Cross-reactivity with structural homologs: Antibodies may recognize proteins with similar epitopes, particularly other members of the same protein family. This can be identified through systematic testing with related proteins and controlled through more stringent washing conditions.

  • Non-specific binding to abundant proteins: High-abundance yeast proteins (especially in the 40-70 kDa range) may produce background signals. This can be mitigated by using higher antibody dilutions and more effective blocking agents such as 5% BSA instead of milk proteins.

  • Post-translational modification recognition: Antibodies may detect specific post-translational modifications rather than the core protein itself, leading to variable signal patterns. Phosphatase or glycosidase treatment of samples can help differentiate these signals.

  • Fc receptor binding: Yeast cell wall components may bind to the Fc portion of antibodies non-specifically. Pre-incubation with non-immune IgG from the same species can reduce this effect.

  • Buffer composition interference: Components in lysis or sample buffers may affect antibody binding characteristics. Systematic testing of different buffer systems can identify optimal conditions that minimize non-specific interactions.

According to comprehensive antibody validation studies, approximately 33-73% of antibodies (depending on the type) fail to specifically detect their intended targets in at least one application, highlighting the critical importance of proper controls and validation strategies .

How can YOL097W-A antibodies be effectively used in co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify protein interaction partners?

For robust co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) studies to identify YOL097W-A interaction partners, researchers should implement this methodological framework:

  • Crosslinking optimization: Test a gradient of formaldehyde concentrations (0.1-1%) and incubation times (5-15 minutes) to stabilize transient protein interactions without over-crosslinking, which can interfere with antibody recognition.

  • Lysis buffer composition: Utilize gentle non-ionic detergents (0.5% NP-40 or 0.5% Triton X-100) in buffers containing 100-150mM salt to maintain protein-protein interactions while achieving effective cell lysis.

  • IP strategy selection:

    • Direct approach: Immunoprecipitate with YOL097W-A antibody to pull down the protein and its partners

    • Reverse approach: Tag potential interacting proteins and immunoprecipitate with tag-specific antibodies to confirm interaction with YOL097W-A

  • Control implementation:

    • Non-immune IgG from the same species as the YOL097W-A antibody

    • Lysate from YOL097W-A knockout yeast

    • Competitive peptide blocking

  • Washing stringency gradient: Perform sequential washes with increasing stringency to eliminate non-specific binders while preserving genuine interactions.

  • Interactome analysis: Analyze co-immunoprecipitated proteins using mass spectrometry, focusing on proteins enriched compared to control IPs.

  • Interaction validation: Confirm key interactions using reciprocal co-IPs, proximity ligation assays, or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) techniques.

This systematic approach enables identification of physiologically relevant protein interactions while minimizing experimental artifacts .

What strategies can researchers employ to optimize immunofluorescence protocols using YOL097W-A antibodies in yeast cells?

Optimizing immunofluorescence protocols for YOL097W-A detection in yeast requires addressing the unique challenges of yeast cell wall and small cell size:

  • Cell wall digestion optimization: Calibrate spheroplasting by testing different concentrations of zymolyase (50-200 U/ml) and incubation times (15-45 minutes) to efficiently remove the cell wall while preserving cellular structures.

  • Fixation method selection:

    • Formaldehyde (3-4%) for general structure preservation

    • Methanol/acetone for enhanced epitope accessibility

    • Glyoxal (3%) for superior ultrastructure preservation with reduced autofluorescence

  • Permeabilization technique: Test a gradient of detergent concentrations (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 or 0.05-0.2% SDS) for optimal antibody access to intracellular targets.

  • Signal amplification methods:

    • Tyramide signal amplification for low-abundance proteins

    • Secondary antibody selection (highly cross-adsorbed variants)

    • Fluorophore selection to avoid yeast autofluorescence spectra

  • Mosaic imaging approach: Implement the mixed-field technique where wild-type and YOL097W-A knockout yeast cells are mixed and imaged in the same microscopic field to provide internal controls and reduce imaging bias.

  • Quantification strategy: Apply automated image analysis with appropriate thresholding to quantify signal intensity and localization patterns.

Studies show that approximately 48% of recombinant antibodies generate specific signals in immunofluorescence applications, compared to 31% of monoclonal and 22% of polyclonal antibodies, making antibody selection particularly critical for this application .

How should researchers troubleshoot weak or absent signals when using YOL097W-A antibodies in Western blot applications?

When encountering weak or absent signals with YOL097W-A antibodies in Western blots, implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Protein expression verification:

    • Confirm YOL097W-A expression levels in your yeast strain under the specific experimental conditions

    • Consider that expression may be condition-dependent or growth phase-specific

  • Sample preparation assessment:

    • Evaluate protein extraction efficiency using total protein stains

    • Test alternative lysis methods (mechanical versus enzymatic)

    • Add fresh protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

    • Avoid sample overheating during preparation

  • Transfer optimization:

    • Verify transfer efficiency using reversible staining of membranes

    • Adjust transfer conditions for the specific molecular weight of YOL097W-A

    • Test different membrane types (PVDF versus nitrocellulose)

  • Antibody parameters:

    • Test a concentration gradient (1:100 to 1:5000)

    • Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)

    • Try different secondary antibodies with enhanced sensitivity

  • Detection system enhancement:

    • Switch to more sensitive detection methods (chemiluminescence to enhanced chemiluminescence)

    • Consider signal amplification systems for low-abundance proteins

    • Optimize exposure times for digital imaging systems

  • Epitope accessibility improvement:

    • Test both reducing and non-reducing conditions

    • Consider native versus denaturing conditions if epitope is conformational

This methodical approach addresses the most common causes of signal problems when working with yeast protein antibodies .

What statistical approaches are recommended for quantifying Western blot data from YOL097W-A antibody experiments?

For rigorous quantification of Western blot data using YOL097W-A antibodies, researchers should implement these statistical best practices:

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Include at least 3-5 biological replicates per condition

    • Process all samples for comparison on the same gel when possible

    • Include a dilution series of a reference sample to establish linearity of signal

  • Image acquisition parameters:

    • Capture images before signal saturation occurs

    • Use identical exposure settings across all comparable samples

    • Implement background subtraction using adjacent areas

  • Normalization strategies:

    • Normalize to total protein loading (using stain-free gels or membrane stains)

    • If using housekeeping proteins, validate their stability under your experimental conditions

    • Apply lane normalization factors based on total protein quantification

  • Quantification methodology:

    • Use integrated density measurements rather than peak intensity

    • Subtract local background for each band

    • Apply consistent region of interest dimensions across samples

  • Statistical analysis framework:

    • Test for normal distribution using Shapiro-Wilk test

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution (parametric or non-parametric)

    • Report effect sizes alongside p-values

    • Calculate confidence intervals for fold changes

  • Data presentation standards:

    • Include representative blot images alongside quantification

    • Present quantified data as mean ± standard deviation or standard error

    • Report sample sizes clearly for each experimental group

This comprehensive approach ensures scientifically sound quantification of Western blot data, addressing the known challenges in antibody-based protein quantification .

How can YOL097W-A antibodies be integrated into high-throughput proteomics workflows?

Integrating YOL097W-A antibodies into high-throughput proteomics workflows requires strategic adaptation of traditional methods:

  • Multiplex immunoassay development:

    • Conjugate YOL097W-A antibodies with distinct fluorophores or barcodes

    • Validate multiplex compatibility with other antibodies of interest

    • Establish standard curves for quantification in complex samples

  • Automated IP-MS workflow implementation:

    • Optimize antibody coupling to magnetic beads for robotic handling

    • Calibrate washing steps to maintain specificity in automated systems

    • Implement parallel processing of control samples for background subtraction

  • Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) adaptation:

    • Determine optimal sample dilution series for linear signal range

    • Validate antibody specificity in microarray format

    • Develop quantification algorithms for spot intensity measurement

  • Single-cell proteomics integration:

    • Test antibody compatibility with cell fixation and permeabilization protocols

    • Optimize signal amplification for detection of low-abundance proteins

    • Develop computational pipelines for single-cell data analysis

  • Cross-platform validation strategy:

    • Compare quantification results between different proteomics approaches

    • Establish conversion factors between relative and absolute quantification methods

    • Implement reference standards for cross-experimental normalization

This methodology enables researchers to leverage YOL097W-A antibodies in modern proteomics workflows while maintaining the necessary specificity and sensitivity for reliable protein detection and quantification .

What considerations should researchers take into account when designing CRISPR-based validation experiments for YOL097W-A antibodies?

Designing rigorous CRISPR-based validation experiments for YOL097W-A antibodies requires careful consideration of multiple methodological aspects:

  • Guide RNA design strategy:

    • Design multiple sgRNAs targeting different regions of the YOL097W-A gene

    • Verify guide RNA specificity using genome-wide off-target prediction tools

    • Include control sgRNAs targeting non-essential genes

  • Knockout validation methodology:

    • Confirm gene disruption through sequencing of the target locus

    • Verify loss of mRNA expression via RT-qPCR

    • Establish clonal knockout lines to eliminate mixed populations

  • Epitope preservation assessment:

    • Design knockouts that preserve the antibody epitope region but disrupt protein function

    • Create truncation variants to map the precise epitope recognition site

    • Generate point mutations in potential epitope regions

  • Control implementation:

    • Include wild-type cells processed in parallel

    • Create isogenic control lines with non-targeting CRISPR

    • Process samples from multiple independent knockout clones

  • Application-specific validation:

    • Test antibody performance in all intended applications (WB, IP, IF) using knockout controls

    • Quantify signal reduction in knockout versus wild-type samples

    • Determine threshold signal-to-noise ratios for reliable detection

  • Data interpretation framework:

    • Calculate specificity metrics (reduction in signal in knockout versus wild-type)

    • Establish minimum performance standards for application-specific use

    • Document residual signal patterns in knockout samples

This comprehensive validation framework ensures that researchers can definitively establish the specificity of YOL097W-A antibodies, with recent studies showing that genetic knockout controls provide the most stringent validation method for antibody specificity assessment .

How might advanced antibody engineering techniques improve the performance of next-generation YOL097W-A antibodies?

The application of cutting-edge antibody engineering to YOL097W-A detection offers several promising avenues for performance enhancement:

  • Single-domain antibody development:

    • Engineer nanobodies or single-domain antibodies against YOL097W-A for enhanced penetration into yeast cells

    • Optimize for stability in varied buffer conditions

    • Improve performance in live-cell imaging applications

  • Affinity maturation strategies:

    • Apply directed evolution with yeast display systems to select higher-affinity variants

    • Implement computational design to optimize binding interfaces

    • Develop pH-dependent binding variants for improved elution in IP applications

  • Multispecific antibody engineering:

    • Create bispecific antibodies targeting YOL097W-A and common tags for enhanced detection

    • Develop antibodies recognizing different conformational states of the protein

    • Engineer detection of specific post-translational modifications

  • Signal enhancement integration:

    • Incorporate split fluorescent proteins for direct visualization without secondary detection

    • Develop proximity-dependent labeling domains for interactome mapping

    • Engineer antibody-enzyme fusions for signal amplification

  • Production optimization:

    • Design stable recombinant antibody formats with extended shelf-life

    • Optimize expression systems for consistent batch-to-batch performance

    • Develop antibody variants with enhanced thermostability

Current research demonstrates that recombinant antibody formats generally outperform traditional monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, with 67% of recombinant antibodies successfully detecting their targets in Western blot applications compared to 41% for monoclonals and 27% for polyclonals .

What role might YOL097W-A antibodies play in advancing our understanding of fundamental yeast cellular processes?

YOL097W-A antibodies serve as critical tools for elucidating fundamental aspects of yeast biology through these research applications:

  • Protein localization dynamics:

    • Track YOL097W-A subcellular distribution throughout the cell cycle

    • Map relocalization patterns under different stress conditions

    • Correlate localization changes with functional outcomes

  • Protein interaction network mapping:

    • Identify interaction partners through immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry

    • Characterize temporal changes in interaction networks

    • Define protein complex composition and assembly dynamics

  • Post-translational modification landscape:

    • Develop modification-specific antibodies to track regulatory events

    • Map the relationship between modifications and protein function

    • Establish modification patterns across different growth conditions

  • Evolutionary conservation studies:

    • Compare YOL097W-A characteristics across yeast species

    • Identify conserved functional domains through comparative analysis

    • Trace protein evolution through structural and functional comparison

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Correlate protein abundance with transcriptomic and metabolomic data

    • Model protein function within broader cellular networks

    • Predict pathway interactions based on quantitative protein data

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.