YOR263C is a gene/protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker's yeast), identified in the systematic genome sequencing project with Uniprot accession number Q08728 . This protein is studied primarily in the context of yeast molecular biology and cellular processes. While the search results don't provide extensive information on its specific function, it appears in research contexts related to membrane interactions, as seen in studies examining ESCRT's impact on membrane lesions . YOR263C represents an important research target for understanding fundamental yeast cellular processes. Research on yeast proteins like YOR263C contributes significantly to our understanding of eukaryotic cell biology due to the high degree of conservation of basic cellular mechanisms between yeast and higher eukaryotes.
The YOR263C Antibody should be stored at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt . It's critical to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can degrade antibody quality and reduce binding efficiency . The antibody is provided in liquid form with a storage buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative . This buffer composition helps maintain antibody stability during long-term storage. For working aliquots, researchers should divide the stock into small volumes to minimize freeze-thaw cycles. When handling the antibody, always wear gloves and work in clean conditions to prevent contamination that could affect experimental outcomes.
The YOR263C Antibody has been tested and validated for multiple detection methods, primarily:
Western Blot (WB): For detecting the target protein in cell lysates and tissue homogenates, providing information about protein size and expression levels .
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative detection of the target protein in solution .
While not explicitly mentioned in the product documentation, based on standard antibody applications, this polyclonal antibody might potentially be suitable for:
Immunoprecipitation (IP): To isolate and purify the target protein from complex mixtures.
Immunofluorescence (IF): To visualize protein localization within cells, though this would require additional validation.
When employing any method, proper identification of the antigen should be ensured through appropriate controls .
For optimal Western Blot results with YOR263C Antibody, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample Preparation:
Prepare yeast cell lysates using standard protocols (e.g., glass bead lysis or enzymatic digestion)
Include protease inhibitors to prevent protein degradation
Denature samples in standard Laemmli buffer with β-mercaptoethanol
SDS-PAGE and Transfer:
Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes at 100V for 60-90 minutes
Antibody Incubation:
Block membrane with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Dilute YOR263C Antibody at 1:500 to 1:2000 in blocking buffer (optimization recommended)
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation
Wash 3-5 times with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000-1:10000) for 1 hour at room temperature
Detection:
Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system
Expose to X-ray film or image using a digital imaging system
As an antigen affinity-purified polyclonal antibody, YOR263C Antibody should provide specific detection of the target protein when these conditions are properly optimized for your specific experimental system .
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for generating reliable data. For YOR263C Antibody, consider these methodological approaches:
Positive and Negative Controls:
Use wild-type yeast expressing YOR263C as a positive control
Use YOR263C knockout strains as negative controls
Compare results from multiple antibody lots if available
Peptide Competition Assay:
Pre-incubate the antibody with excess purified YOR263C protein or immunizing peptide
Run parallel Western blots with blocked and unblocked antibody
Specific signals should be significantly reduced or eliminated in the blocked sample
Correlation with Alternative Detection Methods:
Compare protein detection with mRNA expression levels via qPCR
Use tagged versions of YOR263C and detect with tag-specific antibodies
Mass Spectrometry Validation:
Immunoprecipitate the protein using YOR263C Antibody
Analyze the precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Confirm the presence of YOR263C peptides
This multi-faceted validation approach ensures that signals detected are specific to YOR263C rather than cross-reactive proteins, particularly important given the complex nature of yeast cell extracts .
For rigorous experimental design with YOR263C Antibody, the following controls should be included:
Essential Controls:
Positive Control: Wild-type yeast lysate known to express YOR263C protein
Negative Control: YOR263C deletion strain lysate
Loading Control: Detection of a constitutively expressed yeast protein (e.g., actin, GAPDH)
Secondary Antibody Only Control: Omit primary antibody to check for non-specific binding
Additional Controls for Specific Applications:
For Western Blot:
Pre-immunization serum control (if available)
Recombinant YOR263C protein as a size reference
For Immunoprecipitation:
Non-specific IgG control
Input sample (pre-IP lysate)
For ELISA:
Standard curve using recombinant YOR263C
Blank wells (no antigen)
For Expression Studies:
Time-course or condition-specific reference samples
Biological replicates (minimum three) for statistical analysis
These controls help distinguish true YOR263C-specific signals from technical artifacts, cross-reactivity, or non-specific binding, ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of experimental results .
Optimizing immunoprecipitation (IP) with YOR263C Antibody requires careful consideration of several methodological factors:
Buffer Optimization:
Use mild lysis buffers (e.g., 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 or Triton X-100)
Add protease inhibitors freshly before use
Consider adding phosphatase inhibitors if studying phosphorylation
Optimize detergent type and concentration based on protein localization
Antibody Coupling:
Directly couple 2-5 μg of YOR263C Antibody to protein A/G beads
Pre-clear lysate with protein A/G beads alone to reduce non-specific binding
For co-IP studies, consider using a chemical crosslinker to covalently bind the antibody to beads
Incubation Conditions:
Incubate lysate with antibody-coupled beads for 2-4 hours at 4°C with gentle rotation
Wash beads 3-5 times with lysis buffer containing reduced detergent
Elute proteins using either SDS sample buffer for Western blot analysis or mild elution conditions for functional studies
Validation Strategy:
Confirm successful IP by Western blot using a portion of the IP sample
Identify co-immunoprecipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Compare results with known YOR263C interaction data from databases
This optimized protocol leverages the polyclonal nature of YOR263C Antibody, which recognizes multiple epitopes and potentially increases IP efficiency compared to monoclonal antibodies .
YOR263C Antibody offers several sophisticated applications for investigating yeast cellular processes:
Protein Localization Studies:
Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot analysis to determine compartment-specific distribution
Immunofluorescence microscopy (if validated) to visualize spatial distribution within cells
Co-localization studies with known organelle markers
Protein Expression Analysis:
Monitor YOR263C expression under different growth conditions or stress responses
Quantify protein levels during cell cycle progression
Compare expression between wild-type and mutant strains
Protein-Protein Interaction Networks:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify direct binding partners
Proximity labeling techniques (when combined with appropriate tagging)
Validation of interactions identified through high-throughput screens
Post-Translational Modifications:
Detection of specific modifications using modification-specific antibodies after IP with YOR263C Antibody
Analysis of how modifications affect YOR263C function or localization
These applications provide insights into the functional role of YOR263C in yeast biology, potentially revealing connections to membrane processes as suggested by its mention in membrane lesion studies . Each application requires careful optimization and appropriate controls to ensure reliable results.
While the provided search results contain limited specific information about YOR263C's molecular functions, we can analyze what is known and potential research directions:
Known Associations:
The protein appears in research related to ESCRT and membrane lesions, suggesting a potential role in membrane biology or trafficking pathways
As a yeast protein (Uniprot Q08728), it likely participates in conserved eukaryotic cellular processes
Research Approaches to Elucidate Function:
Interaction Mapping:
Using YOR263C Antibody for co-IP followed by mass spectrometry
Yeast two-hybrid screening with YOR263C as bait
Phenotypic Analysis:
Characterization of YOR263C deletion or overexpression strains
Growth assays under various stress conditions
Comparative Genomics:
Identification of orthologs in other species
Functional prediction based on conserved domains
Transcriptional Profiling:
RNA-seq analysis of YOR263C mutants
Identification of genes co-regulated with YOR263C
The antibody serves as a key tool in these approaches, enabling protein detection and characterization in various experimental contexts. Researchers investigating YOR263C should consult yeast genome databases for additional functional information and potential interactions that may not be captured in the provided search results.
Epitope mapping with YOR263C Antibody can reveal critical antigenic determinants and structure-function relationships. Several methodological approaches can be employed:
1. Peptide Array Analysis:
Synthesize overlapping peptides (15-20 amino acids) spanning the entire YOR263C sequence
Spot peptides onto membranes or microarrays
Probe with YOR263C Antibody followed by detection
Identify peptides showing positive signals to map linear epitopes
2. Truncation Mutant Analysis:
Generate a series of truncated YOR263C constructs
Express and purify truncated proteins
Test antibody binding via Western blot or ELISA
Narrow down regions containing epitopes
3. Alanine Scanning Mutagenesis:
Create point mutations replacing key amino acids with alanine
Express mutant proteins and test antibody binding
Identify critical residues for antibody recognition
4. Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry:
Compare exchange rates in free protein versus antibody-bound protein
Regions with reduced exchange when antibody-bound indicate epitope locations
5. X-ray Crystallography or Cryo-EM:
For highest resolution mapping, solve the structure of YOR263C-antibody complex
Directly visualize the binding interface
As a polyclonal antibody, YOR263C Antibody likely recognizes multiple epitopes, which should be considered when interpreting results . This information can provide valuable insights into protein structure and guide the development of more specific detection reagents.
YOR263C Antibody binding studies can yield substantial structural insights through several advanced methodological approaches:
Conformational Analysis:
Compare antibody binding to native versus denatured YOR263C to identify conformational epitopes
Use circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to analyze structural changes upon antibody binding
Apply limited proteolysis to antibody-bound protein to identify protected regions
Accessibility Mapping:
Use the antibody to probe structural changes under different conditions
Compare binding efficiency to YOR263C in different buffer conditions
Identify regions that become exposed or hidden during protein interactions
Functional Domain Identification:
Correlate epitope mapping data with predicted functional domains
Test whether antibody binding affects specific protein functions
Develop function-blocking antibodies based on epitope knowledge
Integration with Computational Models:
Compare experimental antibody binding data with predicted protein structures
Refine structural models based on experimentally determined epitopes
Generate antibody-antigen docking models
This structural information provides insights beyond simple detection of YOR263C, potentially revealing mechanistic details about protein function and interaction interfaces. The polyclonal nature of the antibody provides an advantage for detecting multiple structural features simultaneously .
High background is a common challenge when working with antibodies. For YOR263C Antibody, consider these methodological solutions:
Western Blot Optimization:
Blocking Optimization:
Test different blocking agents (5% milk, 3-5% BSA, commercial blockers)
Increase blocking time to 2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C
Add 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to blocking buffer
Antibody Dilution Optimization:
Test serial dilutions (1:500 to 1:5000) to find optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Prepare antibody in fresh blocking buffer
Consider adding 0.1-0.2% Tween-20 to antibody dilution buffer
Washing Improvements:
Increase wash duration (5-10 minutes per wash)
Increase number of washes (5-6 times)
Use TBST with 0.1-0.3% Tween-20
Membrane Handling:
Ensure membranes remain wet throughout the procedure
Handle membranes with clean forceps to avoid contamination
Consider fresh transfer buffer and clean transfer apparatus
ELISA Optimization:
Titrate both primary and secondary antibodies
Increase wash volume and number of washes
Use validated blocking reagents known to work with yeast proteins
Sample-Related Solutions:
Pre-clear lysates with Protein A/G beads before antibody incubation
Filter samples through 0.45 μm filters to remove aggregates
Include competing non-specific proteins (e.g., BSA) in antibody dilution buffer
These methodological adjustments should significantly reduce background while maintaining specific YOR263C signal .
False negative results can occur for multiple reasons when using YOR263C Antibody. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate data interpretation:
Sample Preparation Issues:
Protein Degradation:
Always use fresh protease inhibitors in lysis buffers
Maintain samples at 4°C during processing
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of samples
Inadequate Extraction:
For yeast samples, ensure thorough cell wall disruption
Optimize lysis buffer composition for YOR263C solubilization
Consider different detergents if YOR263C is membrane-associated
Detection Method Limitations:
Epitope Masking:
Protein-protein interactions may block antibody access
Post-translational modifications might alter epitope recognition
Protein conformation in native conditions may hide epitopes
Technical Parameters:
Insufficient antibody concentration
Inadequate incubation time or temperature
Expired or degraded detection reagents
Expression Levels:
Biological Variability:
YOR263C may be expressed at low levels under certain conditions
Expression might be cell-cycle dependent
Strain-specific variations in expression
| Issue | Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No signal despite presence of protein | Epitope denaturation | Try different sample preparation methods |
| Weak signal | Low antibody concentration | Increase antibody concentration or incubation time |
| Inconsistent results | Antibody degradation | Aliquot antibody and avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
| Signal in control but not in test | Low expression in test condition | Load more protein or use enrichment techniques |
By systematically addressing these factors, researchers can minimize false negative results and improve detection reliability .
Accurate quantification of YOR263C protein expression requires rigorous methodology and appropriate controls:
Western Blot Quantification:
Sample Preparation Standardization:
Use consistent cell numbers or protein amounts across samples
Include a standard curve of recombinant YOR263C protein (if available)
Process all samples simultaneously to minimize variation
Loading Control Normalization:
Probe for housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, GAPDH, tubulin)
Calculate relative expression as YOR263C signal/loading control signal
Ensure loading control is in the linear detection range
Image Acquisition and Analysis:
Use a digital imaging system with a linear dynamic range
Avoid overexposure which prevents accurate quantification
Analyze band intensities using software like ImageJ or specialized analysis tools
ELISA-Based Quantification:
Develop a sandwich ELISA using YOR263C Antibody
Generate a standard curve using purified recombinant YOR263C
Ensure samples fall within the linear range of the standard curve
Advanced Quantification Methods:
Mass Spectrometry:
Use selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)
Include isotopically labeled peptide standards for absolute quantification
Immunoprecipitate with YOR263C Antibody before MS analysis for enrichment
Automated Western Platforms:
Consider platforms like Jess or Wes (ProteinSimple) for higher reproducibility
These systems provide automated quantification with wider dynamic range
For all quantification methods, biological replicates (minimum n=3) and appropriate statistical analysis are essential for meaningful results .
Contradictory results when using YOR263C Antibody require systematic analysis and careful interpretation:
Sources of Contradiction and Resolution Strategies:
Antibody-Related Factors:
Different lots may have variable specificity or sensitivity
Solution: Validate each new lot against a reference sample
Compare results using alternative antibodies if available
Experimental Conditions:
Different lysis methods may extract different protein pools
Solution: Standardize protocols across experiments
Document all buffer compositions and conditions precisely
Biological Variability:
YOR263C expression or modification may vary with growth conditions
Solution: Control growth conditions precisely
Record cell density, growth phase, and media composition
Technical Approach:
Different detection methods have different sensitivities and limitations
Solution: Use multiple complementary techniques (WB, ELISA, MS)
Consider the specific advantages and limitations of each method
Methodological Framework for Resolving Contradictions:
Reproduce the contradictory results under identical conditions to confirm the contradiction
Systematically vary one parameter at a time to identify the source of variation
Implement appropriate controls specific to each experimental condition
Consider biological explanations for seemingly contradictory results:
Post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition
Alternative splicing or processing of YOR263C
Protein-protein interactions masking epitopes
Document and report all experimental conditions that influence results
This systematic approach helps distinguish genuine biological phenomena from technical artifacts, potentially leading to new insights about YOR263C regulation or function .
Comparing YOR263C across yeast strains requires methodological approaches that account for genetic and phenotypic variation:
Sequence Comparison Methodology:
Perform sequence alignment of YOR263C across multiple yeast strains
Identify conserved domains and strain-specific variations
Correlate sequence variations with functional differences
Expression Analysis Across Strains:
Use YOR263C Antibody to detect and quantify protein levels in different strains
Normalize expression to appropriate housekeeping proteins
Correlate expression levels with strain-specific phenotypes
Functional Conservation Assessment:
Create YOR263C deletion strains in multiple genetic backgrounds
Compare phenotypic consequences across strains
Perform complementation studies with YOR263C variants
| Strain | Sequence Identity | Expression Level | Localization | Associated Phenotypes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S288C (reference) | 100% | +++ | [Cell compartment] | [Phenotypes] |
| W303 | [%] | [Relative level] | [Cell compartment] | [Phenotypes] |
| RM11-1a | [%] | [Relative level] | [Cell compartment] | [Phenotypes] |
| Σ1278b | [%] | [Relative level] | [Cell compartment] | [Phenotypes] |
The YOR263C Antibody serves as a critical tool in these comparative studies, allowing researchers to examine protein expression and properties across diverse genetic backgrounds . Such comparisons can reveal strain-specific adaptations and evolutionary conservation patterns of the YOR263C protein.
Understanding YOR263C homologs across species provides evolutionary context and potential functional insights:
Homology Identification Methods:
Sequence-Based Approaches:
BLAST analysis against genomic and protein databases
PSI-BLAST for detecting distant homologs
HMM-based searches using HMMER
Structural Prediction:
Use of AlphaFold or similar tools to predict YOR263C structure
Structure-based homology detection using tools like DALI
Functional Domain Analysis:
Identification of conserved domains using Pfam or InterPro
Conservation analysis of specific functional motifs
Cross-Reactivity Testing:
Examine if YOR263C Antibody recognizes homologs in closely related yeast species
Test antibody reactivity against predicted homologs in model organisms
Develop homolog-specific antibodies for comparative studies
Evolutionary Analysis:
Construct phylogenetic trees to visualize evolutionary relationships
Calculate selection pressures (dN/dS ratios) on different protein regions
Identify conserved vs. rapidly evolving regions
While the search results don't provide specific information about YOR263C homologs, this methodological framework allows researchers to identify potential homologs and assess functional conservation across species. Such analysis can provide insights into the fundamental biological role of YOR263C and its evolutionary significance .
YOR263C Antibody can serve as a valuable tool in evolutionary studies through several methodological approaches:
Cross-Species Reactivity Analysis:
Test antibody recognition across related yeast species
Determine epitope conservation through comparative binding studies
Create a cross-reactivity profile correlating with evolutionary distance
Protein Conservation Mapping:
Use the antibody to detect expressed homologs in different species
Compare protein expression levels across evolutionary lineages
Correlate expression patterns with species-specific adaptations
Functional Conservation Assessment:
Immunoprecipitate YOR263C and homologs from different species
Compare interaction partners across species using mass spectrometry
Identify conserved vs. species-specific protein complexes
Research Design for Evolutionary Studies:
Sample Preparation:
Prepare protein extracts from phylogenetically diverse yeast species
Ensure consistent extraction methods across all samples
Normalize protein concentrations for fair comparison
Detection Methods:
Western blot analysis with optimized conditions for cross-species detection
Immunofluorescence to compare subcellular localization across species
Co-immunoprecipitation to examine conservation of protein interactions
Data Analysis:
Correlate antibody binding affinity with sequence divergence
Integrate findings with phylogenetic data
Model the evolution of epitope regions
This approach leverages the specificity of YOR263C Antibody to examine protein conservation patterns, potentially revealing how selective pressures have shaped YOR263C function throughout evolutionary history .
Researchers studying YOR263C can leverage numerous databases and resources to enhance their investigations:
Yeast-Specific Databases:
Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD):
Comprehensive resource for S. cerevisiae genomic data
Contains gene function annotations, phenotype data, and protein interactions
Provides literature references specific to YOR263C
Yeast GFP Fusion Localization Database:
Data on subcellular localization of yeast proteins
Fluorescence microscopy images for protein localization patterns
SPELL (Serial Pattern of Expression Levels Locator):
Expression patterns across different conditions
Co-expressed genes that may function with YOR263C
Antibody and Protein Resources:
Patent and Literature Antibody Database (PLAbDab):
UniProt:
Structural Antibody Database (SAbDab):
Observed Antibody Space (OAS):
Experimental Resources:
AddGene and EUROSCARF:
Repositories of yeast strains and plasmids
May contain YOR263C deletion strains or tagged constructs
BioGRID:
Database of protein-protein interactions
Physical and genetic interactions involving YOR263C
Integrating data from these resources with experimental results using YOR263C Antibody provides a comprehensive understanding of this yeast protein in its broader biological context .