YOR392W is a yeast open reading frame (ORF) located on chromosome XV. Key features include:
Gene Ontology: Associated with cellular processes such as vesicle-mediated transport and Golgi organization .
Protein Structure: Predicted molecular weight of ~45 kDa, with no known post-translational modifications.
Conservation: Homologs exist in Ashbya gossypii and other fungi, but functional studies in yeast remain limited .
While direct studies on YOR392W Antibody are sparse, broader antibody validation frameworks provide context:
Validation Protocols:
Commercial Antibody Reliability:
The YOR392W Antibody belongs to a broader catalog of yeast-targeting reagents. Representative examples include:
| Antibody Target | Code | Species | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZPR1 | CSB-PA026617XA01SVG | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | WB, IF |
| YTH1 | CSB-PA758743XA01DOT | Ashbya gossypii | IP, ELISA |
| AMF1 | CSB-PA600150XA01SVG | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | WB, IF |
Data derived from Cusabio product listings .
Functional Studies: No peer-reviewed publications specifically utilizing YOR392W Antibody were identified.
Therapeutic Relevance: Unlike human therapeutic antibodies (e.g., COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies; [Sources 6–8]), yeast antibodies are primarily research tools.
Validation Urgency: Adopt consensus protocols (e.g., YCharOS standards) to ensure reproducibility .
YOR392W is a protein-coding gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) with the UniProt accession number Q08915 . This protein is of interest in yeast research due to its potential role in cellular processes. The YOR392W antibody is specifically designed to detect this protein in S. cerevisiae strain ATCC 204508/S288c, making it valuable for studying protein expression patterns, localization, and interactions in this model organism. Understanding YOR392W contributes to our broader knowledge of cellular functions in eukaryotic systems, as many yeast proteins have homologs in higher organisms including humans.
The YOR392W antibody has been specifically tested and validated for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Western Blot (WB) applications, with particular emphasis on ensuring proper identification of the antigen . These applications allow researchers to:
Quantify YOR392W protein levels using ELISA
Determine the molecular weight and expression levels of YOR392W in protein extracts via Western Blot
Compare YOR392W expression across different experimental conditions
When designing experiments, researchers should consider that this antibody has been specifically validated with the S. cerevisiae strain ATCC 204508/S288c, which may affect cross-reactivity with other yeast strains.
For maximum stability and activity retention, the YOR392W antibody should be stored at either -20°C or -80°C immediately upon receipt . The antibody should not undergo repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can degrade the protein structure and reduce antibody efficiency. The antibody is provided in a liquid formulation containing preservative (0.03% Proclin 300) and stabilizers (50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4) .
For routine use:
Aliquot the antibody into smaller volumes upon first thaw
Store working dilutions at 4°C for up to one week
Return stock solutions to -20°C or -80°C for long-term storage
Avoid exposure to light and contamination with microorganisms
Optimal sample preparation is crucial for successful detection of YOR392W in yeast cells. Based on general antibody methodologies and yeast protein extraction techniques:
For cell lysate preparation:
Harvest yeast cells during the appropriate growth phase
Disrupt cell walls using glass beads or enzymatic methods
Extract proteins in a buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Clear lysates by centrifugation to remove cell debris
For Western blot applications:
Denature proteins in sample buffer containing SDS and a reducing agent
Load adequate protein amounts (typically 20-50 μg total protein)
Include a loading control to normalize YOR392W detection across samples
Similar to considerations for antibody titration in other systems, reducing antibody concentration may improve signal-to-noise ratio while maintaining detection sensitivity .
Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio is crucial for obtaining reliable results with the YOR392W antibody. Drawing from research on antibody optimization techniques:
Concentration titration:
Perform a systematic dilution series (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:4000)
Most antibodies show optimal performance between 0.625-2.5 μg/mL, with reduced background at lower concentrations
Antibodies used at high concentrations (>2.5 μg/mL) often show minimal response to fourfold titration reduction
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers)
Optimize blocking time and temperature
Consider using the blocking agent in antibody diluent
Washing protocol refinement:
Increase number and duration of washes
Test different detergent concentrations in wash buffers
Use automated washers for consistent results
Recent research on antibody optimization shows that "reducing concentration of antibodies targeting highly expressed epitopes can be further reduced without affecting resolution of positive and negative cells, even when these antibodies are already used within their linear concentration range" .
Validating antibody specificity is essential to ensure experimental results accurately reflect YOR392W biology. A comprehensive validation approach includes:
Genetic controls:
Test the antibody in YOR392W knockout strains (should show no signal)
Use YOR392W overexpression strains as positive controls
Peptide competition assays:
Pre-incubate the antibody with purified YOR392W protein or peptide
A specific antibody will show reduced or eliminated signal
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test the antibody against related yeast proteins
Evaluate potential detection of homologous proteins in other yeast species
Western blot profile analysis:
Confirm detection of a single band at the expected molecular weight
Multiple bands may indicate cross-reactivity or protein modification
Detection of post-translational modifications (PTMs) on YOR392W requires special considerations:
Modification-specific antibody selection:
Sample preparation adaptations:
Include deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., TSA, nicotinamide) in lysis buffers when studying acetylation
Use phosphatase inhibitors when investigating phosphorylation
Optimize extraction methods to preserve labile modifications
Detection strategy:
Perform immunoprecipitation with YOR392W antibody followed by Western blot with modification-specific antibodies
Consider mass spectrometry validation of modifications
| Post-translational Modification | Required Inhibitors | Recommended Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| Acetylation | HDAC inhibitors (TSA, sodium butyrate) | IP-WB or direct WB with anti-acetyl-lysine |
| Phosphorylation | Phosphatase inhibitors (sodium fluoride, sodium orthovanadate) | IP-WB or direct WB with anti-phospho antibodies |
| Ubiquitination | Proteasome inhibitors (MG132) | IP-WB with anti-ubiquitin |
| SUMOylation | SUMO protease inhibitors (NEM) | IP-WB with anti-SUMO |
When experiencing weak or absent signal with YOR392W antibody, consider these potential issues and solutions:
Protein expression variables:
YOR392W may be expressed at low levels under standard conditions
Test different growth phases and stress conditions to induce expression
Consider concentrating proteins through immunoprecipitation before detection
Technical optimization opportunities:
Increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Enhance signal using more sensitive detection methods (chemiluminescence vs. colorimetric)
Optimize blocking conditions to reduce background without diminishing signal
Sample preparation refinements:
Ensure complete cell lysis and protein extraction
Verify protein transfer efficiency in Western blots
Test fresh antibody aliquots to rule out degradation
Research on antibody signals shows that "background signal can account for a major fraction of total sequencing and is primarily derived from antibodies used at high concentrations" , suggesting careful titration may help optimize signal-to-noise ratio.
While the YOR392W antibody's product information specifically mentions validation for ELISA and Western blot , researchers interested in ChIP applications should perform additional validation:
ChIP-specific antibody qualification:
Test antibody recognition of native (non-denatured) YOR392W protein
Optimize crosslinking conditions specific to YOR392W
Validate antibody binding to fixed chromatin preparations
ChIP-qPCR verification:
Design primers for genomic regions where YOR392W is expected to bind
Include negative control regions where binding is not expected
Compare enrichment between specific and control regions
Specificity controls:
Perform ChIP in YOR392W deletion strains
Include isotype control antibodies in parallel experiments
Consider epitope-tagged YOR392W strains for validation
Drawing from approaches in antibody research, researchers should note that "high background and limited response to titration when used above 2.5 μg/mL" can affect results , suggesting careful optimization of antibody concentration for ChIP applications.
For researchers using YOR392W antibody in co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) to study protein-protein interactions:
Buffer optimization for complex preservation:
Test different lysis buffers with varying detergent types and concentrations
Consider non-denaturing conditions to maintain native protein complexes
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation during lengthy procedures
Antibody coupling strategies:
Directly couple antibody to beads to avoid IgG contamination in eluates
Test different antibody:bead ratios to optimize pulldown efficiency
Consider crosslinking antibody to beads to prevent antibody leaching
Validation of interactions:
Perform reciprocal co-IPs when possible
Include negative controls (non-specific IgG, unrelated proteins)
Confirm interactions using orthogonal methods (yeast two-hybrid, proximity labeling)
When designing co-IP experiments, consider that this antibody is polyclonal , which may provide advantages for capturing different conformations of YOR392W but might introduce variability between antibody lots.
Integrating YOR392W antibody into advanced single-cell analysis techniques requires special considerations:
Antibody conjugation options:
Consider oligonucleotide conjugation for CITE-seq applications
Optimize antibody concentration as "oligo-conjugated antibodies show high background and limited response to titration when used above 2.5 μg/mL"
For optimal results, conduct titration experiments as "antibodies can be further diluted, despite being at their linear concentration range, without affecting the identification of epitope-positive cells"
Multiplexing considerations:
When combining with other antibodies, balance concentrations to avoid sequencing read bias
Note that "by simply reducing the concentration of the five antibodies used at 10 μg/mL, [researchers] gained 17% more reads for the remaining antibodies"
Plan panel design to allow adequate signal for all targets
Sample preparation adaptations:
To investigate temporal dynamics of YOR392W expression and localization:
Time-course experimental design:
Sample cells at regular intervals during growth phases
Synchronize yeast cultures to normalize cell cycle position
Quantify YOR392W protein levels by Western blot at each timepoint
Live-cell imaging considerations:
Generate fluorescently-tagged YOR392W constructs for direct visualization
Verify tagged construct functionality through complementation assays
Optimize imaging parameters to reduce phototoxicity during extended imaging
Inducible expression systems:
Place YOR392W under control of regulatable promoters
Monitor protein dynamics following induction or repression
Correlate protein levels with phenotypic outcomes
When designing temporal studies, remember that this antibody is specific to Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain ATCC 204508/S288c , so strain differences should be considered when interpreting results.
YOR392W research using specific antibodies contributes to broader understanding of conserved pathways:
Evolutionary conservation analysis:
Compare YOR392W sequence and function with homologs in other species
Identify conserved domains that may be targets for antibody development
Consider that "while there's great diversity amongst people's collection of antibodies, there are some types that most people likely share" , suggesting evolutionary conservation principles may apply to YOR392W
Pathway mapping approaches:
Use YOR392W antibody in combination with antibodies against known pathway components
Perform co-localization studies to identify spatial relationships
Investigate changes in YOR392W expression or modification in response to pathway perturbation
Translational research implications:
Identify human proteins with similar functions to YOR392W
Investigate whether findings in yeast translate to mammalian systems
Consider how YOR392W studies might inform understanding of human disease mechanisms
Recent advances in computational biology offer opportunities to enhance antibody research:
AI-assisted antibody design:
Machine learning approaches have demonstrated "critical capabilities and advantages over purely experimental techniques" in protein research
Models like MAGE (Monoclonal Antibody GEnerator) represent "a first-in-class model capable of designing" target-specific antibodies
Similar approaches could potentially optimize YOR392W antibody specificity and affinity
Structural prediction integration:
Use protein structure prediction tools to identify accessible epitopes on YOR392W
Model antibody-antigen interactions to optimize binding
Guide antibody engineering efforts through in silico analysis
Data integration platforms:
Combine antibody-based experimental data with -omics datasets
Develop computational workflows to normalize and integrate multi-source data
Build predictive models of YOR392W function based on integrated analyses
Current research indicates that "AI-based approaches have been developed to optimize existing antibodies and generate novel antibody sequences" , suggesting future applications for YOR392W research.
To ensure experimental reproducibility across antibody batches:
Standardized validation assays:
Western blot against reference yeast lysates
ELISA titration curves against purified YOR392W protein
Immunofluorescence with standardized fixation protocols
Quantitative performance metrics:
Signal-to-noise ratio in standard assays
Limit of detection determination
Batch-to-batch variation coefficient calculation
Documentation requirements:
Quality control is particularly important as this antibody is "Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)" , suggesting potential for batch variation that should be systematically assessed.