yohP Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
yohP antibody; b4679 antibody; JW5358.1 antibody; Uncharacterized membrane protein YohP antibody
Target Names
yohP
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: eco:b4679

STRING: 511145.b4679

Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Single-pass membrane protein. Note=May be able to insert into the membrane in both orientations. Depletion of SecE or YidC does not affect membrane insertion.

Q&A

What is yohP and why is it significant for membrane protein research?

YohP is a 27-amino-acid-long small membrane protein in Escherichia coli that has become an important model for studying small membrane protein biogenesis and insertion. It is significant because it engages a unique SRP-dependent posttranslational insertion pathway, contrary to the canonical cotranslational recognition mechanism typically observed for membrane proteins . This makes yohP an excellent model system for investigating alternative protein sorting and membrane insertion pathways in bacteria. YohP's small size (only 27 amino acids) also makes it ideal for studying fundamental principles of membrane protein folding and topology.

What types of yohP antibodies are currently available for research?

Based on current research literature, the following yohP antibodies are available:

  • Polyclonal rabbit anti-Escherichia coli yohP antibodies (e.g., CSB-PA500830XA01ENV-2mg), which recognize the uncharacterized membrane protein YohP (yohP b4679 JW5358.1)

  • Various tagged recombinant systems that allow for immunodetection of yohP using tag-specific antibodies (His-tag, etc.)

Most commercially available antibodies are unconjugated IgG type and are validated for applications such as ELISA and Western blot analysis .

What is the subcellular localization pattern of yohP in E. coli?

YohP displays a distinctive subcellular localization pattern in E. coli:

  • Fluorescence microscopy using YohP-GFP fusion proteins reveals a speckled localization pattern at the membrane, with enrichment at the cell poles and division sites

  • This contrasts with other membrane proteins like SecY, which show largely homogeneous membrane localization

  • Cell fractionation studies confirm that the vast majority of YohP localizes to the inner membrane vesicle (INV) fraction, similar to other membrane proteins like SecY and SecG

  • YohP shows a strong tendency to form SDS-resistant dimers, with dimerization occurring preferentially in the membrane fraction

How can yohP antibodies be used to study membrane protein insertion pathways?

YohP antibodies are valuable tools for investigating membrane protein insertion pathways through several experimental approaches:

  • In vivo cross-linking studies: The antibodies can be used to detect cross-linked adducts between yohP and components of the insertion machinery (SRP, FtsY, SecYEG, YidC) to map interaction networks

  • Membrane fractionation assays: Researchers can use yohP antibodies in Western blot analysis of membrane fractions to track the distribution and enrichment of yohP in different membrane compartments

  • Pulse-chase experiments: These can be combined with immunoprecipitation using yohP antibodies to monitor the kinetics of membrane insertion

  • Protease protection assays: YohP antibodies can be employed to detect protease-resistant fragments in experiments designed to determine membrane topology

A typical experimental workflow might involve:

  • Pulse-labeling cells expressing yohP

  • Cell lysis and fractionation

  • Immunoprecipitation with yohP antibodies

  • SDS-PAGE and autoradiography/Western blot analysis

What are the optimal conditions for detecting yohP using Western blot?

For optimal detection of yohP using Western blot, researchers should consider the following protocol parameters:

Sample preparation:

  • Due to yohP's small size (27 amino acids, ~3 kDa), standard SDS-PAGE conditions may not effectively resolve the protein

  • Use high percentage (15-20%) Tricine-SDS-PAGE gels optimized for small proteins

  • Heat samples at 95°C for 5-10 minutes in sample buffer containing 2% SDS

Western blot conditions:

  • Transfer to PVDF membranes (rather than nitrocellulose) using a wet transfer system (10-15V overnight)

  • Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBS-T

  • Use primary yohP antibody at 0.5 μg/mL concentration

  • Incubate overnight at 4°C

  • Detect with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at 1:10,000 dilution

  • Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) systems

Detection considerations:

  • Be aware that yohP often appears as both monomers (~3 kDa) and SDS-resistant dimers (~6 kDa)

  • The addition of a His-tag or other epitope tags will increase the molecular weight

  • Use positive controls (purified recombinant yohP) to validate detection

How does mRNA targeting influence yohP membrane insertion and how can antibodies help study this phenomenon?

The yohP mRNA demonstrates a unique targeting mechanism that appears to precede protein translation and membrane insertion:

Key findings on yohP mRNA targeting:

  • The yohP mRNA localizes preferentially to the bacterial membrane in vivo, and this occurs translation-independently

  • Nucleotide composition significantly influences membrane localization: increasing uracil or guanine content enhances membrane binding, while increasing cytosine or adenine content reduces it

  • Specific regions (nucleotides 4-30 and 10-27) are critical for membrane localization

  • The SecYEG complex appears to serve as a receptor for yohP mRNA at the membrane

How antibodies can be used to study this phenomenon:

  • Combined RNA/protein localization studies: Researchers can use fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect yohP mRNA combined with immunofluorescence using yohP antibodies to track the relative localization of mRNA versus protein

  • Ribosome nascent chain complex (RNC) isolation: Anti-yohP antibodies can be used to immunoprecipitate ribosome-nascent chain complexes to study the timing of SRP binding relative to mRNA localization

  • Cross-linking followed by immunoprecipitation: This approach can identify proteins that interact with both yohP and its mRNA during membrane targeting

What is known about the structural determinants of yohP membrane insertion and how can antibodies help elucidate them?

Despite its small size, yohP exhibits specific structural features that determine its membrane insertion:

Key structural determinants:

  • YohP lacks a canonical GxxxG dimerization motif commonly found in transmembrane proteins, yet still forms stable dimers

  • The topology analysis suggests a predominant C-in/N-out orientation in the membrane

  • YohP demonstrates posttranslational recognition by SRP, unlike most membrane proteins that are recognized cotranslationally

Antibody-based approaches to study structural determinants:

  • Epitope mapping: Using a panel of antibodies targeting different regions of yohP to determine accessible portions of the protein

  • Conformation-specific antibodies: Development of antibodies that specifically recognize different conformational states of yohP

  • Site-directed mutagenesis combined with antibody detection: Creating mutations in potential functional regions and using antibodies to assess membrane insertion efficiency

  • Accessibility studies: Using membrane-impermeable crosslinkers combined with immunoprecipitation to determine which portions of yohP are exposed on different sides of the membrane

How does the SRP-dependent posttranslational insertion of yohP differ from canonical cotranslational insertion?

YohP engages a unique SRP-dependent posttranslational insertion pathway that differs from canonical cotranslational SRP-dependent insertion in several key aspects:

AspectCanonical SRP PathwayYohP Posttranslational Pathway
Timing of SRP bindingCotranslational (during translation)Posttranslational (after complete synthesis)
mRNA involvementNo significant mRNA targetingmRNA targets to membrane independently
Insertion machineryPrimarily SecYEGEither SecYEG or YidC insertase
Sequence requirementsSignal sequence or transmembrane domainSpecific nucleotide composition in mRNA
Energy requirementsGTP-dependentLess characterized, likely similar

How antibodies can help study these differences:

  • By using yohP antibodies in time-resolved cross-linking experiments to capture the sequence of events during membrane insertion

  • Through pulse-chase experiments combined with immunoprecipitation to determine the kinetics of the process

  • Via reconstitution experiments with purified components using antibodies to track yohP in different stages of the insertion process

What controls should be included when using yohP antibodies in experimental settings?

When using yohP antibodies, the following controls should be incorporated to ensure experimental validity:

Positive controls:

  • Purified recombinant yohP protein for Western blot applications

  • E. coli strains overexpressing yohP for immunofluorescence applications

  • YohP-His tagged proteins when using commercially available antibodies

Negative controls:

  • E. coli strains with yohP gene deletion

  • Unrelated bacterial species (non-E. coli) for specificity confirmation

  • Pre-immune serum (for polyclonal antibodies) or isotype controls (for monoclonal antibodies)

Validation controls:

  • Peptide competition assays to confirm specificity

  • Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of yohP

  • Cross-validation with tag-specific antibodies when using tagged yohP constructs

Technical controls:

  • Loading controls for Western blots (e.g., detection of constitutively expressed proteins)

  • Secondary antibody-only controls for immunofluorescence to assess background

What are the key considerations for using yohP antibodies in immunofluorescence microscopy studies?

When performing immunofluorescence microscopy with yohP antibodies, consider the following:

Fixation and permeabilization:

  • Use 4% paraformaldehyde for 15-20 minutes for initial fixation

  • For membrane proteins like yohP, gentle permeabilization is crucial - use low concentrations of detergents (0.1% Triton X-100 or 0.1% saponin)

  • Alternative fixation with methanol:acetone (1:1) at -20°C may provide better access to membrane proteins

Antibody conditions:

  • Higher antibody concentrations may be needed compared to Western blot applications (typically 1-5 μg/ml)

  • Longer incubation times (overnight at 4°C) often yield better results

  • Blocking with 3-5% BSA or 5-10% normal serum from the secondary antibody host species

Imaging considerations:

  • Use high-resolution microscopy techniques (confocal or super-resolution) to accurately detect the speckled localization pattern of yohP

  • Consider co-staining with membrane markers (e.g., FM4-64) to confirm membrane localization

  • Z-stack imaging is essential to fully capture the three-dimensional distribution of yohP at cell poles and division sites

Data interpretation:

  • Compare with YohP-GFP fusion localization as a reference

  • Be aware that fixation and permeabilization can sometimes alter the apparent distribution of membrane proteins

What are common troubleshooting strategies when yohP antibodies fail to detect the protein?

When encountering difficulties with yohP antibody detection, consider these troubleshooting approaches:

For Western blot detection issues:

  • Size resolution problems: Use higher percentage gels (18-20%) with Tricine-SDS-PAGE systems specifically designed for small proteins

  • Low signal intensity: Try concentrate the membrane fraction through ultracentrifugation; yohP is predominantly found in the inner membrane fraction

  • High background: Optimize blocking conditions (try different blocking agents) and increase washing stringency

  • No detectable signal:

    • Confirm yohP expression through RT-PCR

    • Try denaturing the sample in 8M urea before SDS-PAGE

    • Consider using tag-specific antibodies with tagged yohP constructs as an alternative approach

For immunofluorescence detection issues:

  • Weak signal: Optimize fixation and permeabilization protocols; test different methods to expose membrane epitopes

  • Diffuse signal: Reduce washing stringency and adjust fixation time

  • No signal: Confirm antibody activity via Western blot before immunofluorescence applications

General troubleshooting:

  • Verify antibody quality with dot blot against purified yohP

  • Test different epitope tags if direct yohP detection is problematic

  • Consider using alternative detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)

How can yohP antibodies be used to study the interplay between mRNA localization and protein insertion?

Investigating the relationship between yohP mRNA localization and protein insertion requires sophisticated experimental approaches:

Combined RNA/protein visualization:

  • Perform sequential FISH (for mRNA) and immunofluorescence (for protein) to visualize both molecules simultaneously

  • Use proximity ligation assay (PLA) with oligonucleotide probes against mRNA and antibodies against yohP to detect when they are in close proximity

Biochemical approaches:

  • Conduct subcellular fractionation followed by both RT-PCR (for mRNA) and Western blot with yohP antibodies

  • Perform immunoprecipitation with yohP antibodies followed by RT-PCR to identify associated mRNAs

  • Use UV crosslinking to capture RNA-protein complexes, followed by immunoprecipitation with yohP antibodies

Advanced manipulation experiments:

  • Create mutations in the mRNA that affect localization but not the amino acid sequence, then use yohP antibodies to assess protein localization and insertion efficiency

  • Employ optogenetic tools to control mRNA localization, then monitor protein insertion using yohP antibodies

  • Reconstitute the system in vitro with purified components and fluorescently labeled mRNA and protein (detected with antibodies) to directly observe the spatiotemporal relationship

What emerging technologies can be combined with yohP antibodies to advance membrane protein research?

Several cutting-edge technologies can be integrated with yohP antibody applications:

Proximity-based labeling techniques:

  • BioID or TurboID fusion with yohP for in vivo proximity labeling of interaction partners, followed by detection with yohP antibodies

  • APEX2 fusion with yohP for electron microscopy visualization of precise subcellular localization

Super-resolution microscopy:

  • STORM/PALM imaging with yohP antibodies for nanoscale localization patterns

  • Expansion microscopy to physically enlarge samples for improved visualization of yohP distribution

Single-molecule approaches:

  • Single-molecule tracking of fluorescently labeled yohP antibody fragments to follow insertion dynamics in real-time

  • Combination of yohP antibodies with single-molecule FISH to correlate mRNA and protein localization at the single-molecule level

Cryo-electron microscopy:

  • Use of yohP antibodies as fiducial markers for cryo-electron tomography

  • Detection of yohP in membrane preparation samples to study native membrane environments

Synthetic biology approaches:

  • Engineered yohP variants with altered properties, detected with antibodies, to dissect functional requirements

  • Creation of minimal cells with simplified protein insertion machineries to study the fundamental principles of yohP insertion using antibody detection

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.