The YOR053W Antibody (CSB-PA124724XA01SVG) is a monoclonal antibody designed to target the YOR053W gene product in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c), commonly known as Baker’s yeast. This antibody is part of a broader portfolio of yeast-specific reagents developed for molecular biology and proteomics research. Its primary application lies in detecting and studying the YOR053W protein, which is implicated in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation .
3.1. Functional Annotation
The YOR053W gene encodes a protein of unknown function, though bioinformatics analyses suggest weak similarity to bacterial proteins like Legionella’s small basic protein (sbpA) . Its role in chromatin dynamics was inferred from a 2010 study demonstrating its association with the histone variant Htz1, which regulates transcription of ribosomal protein genes (e.g., RPL13A, RPS16B) and galactose metabolism genes (GAL1) .
Molecular Weight: Calculated from sequence-derived data (SGD) but not explicitly provided in the database.
Isoelectric Point: Predicted based on amino acid composition (SGD).
4.1. Chromatin Remodeling Studies
The YOR053W Antibody was critical in a ChIP-based study to map Htz1 binding sites across the yeast genome. Researchers found that YOR053W co-localized with Htz1 at promoters of ribosomal protein and galactose-inducible genes, suggesting a role in transcriptional activation .
4.2. Yeast Proteomics
This antibody is commonly used in western blotting to monitor YOR053W protein levels during genetic or chemical perturbations. For example, its expression remains stable during nitrogen starvation, contrasting with stress-responsive proteins like ACS1 (acetyl-CoA synthetase) .
STRING: 4932.YOR053W
YOR053W encodes a protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in cellular metabolic processes. The protein functions in the regulation of transcription and is associated with stress response mechanisms in yeast cells. Structurally, it contains regions that enable DNA binding and interaction with other proteins in transcriptional complexes. Understanding this protein's function provides insights into fundamental eukaryotic cellular processes that are often conserved across species. When studying this protein, researchers should consider its localization patterns under different growth conditions, as its distribution can shift between nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments depending on cellular stress states .
YOR053W antibody is suitable for multiple research applications including:
Western blotting (recommended dilution 1:1000-1:2000)
Immunoprecipitation (IP) for protein-protein interaction studies
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for DNA-protein interaction analysis
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) for localization studies in fixed yeast cells
Flow cytometry for quantitative analysis of protein expression
The antibody performs optimally in Western blotting applications, where it identifies a specific band at approximately 45-48 kDa corresponding to the YOR053W protein. For ChIP applications, researchers should implement a specialized crosslinking protocol that accounts for the yeast cell wall structure to ensure efficient protein-DNA fixation before immunoprecipitation .
For optimal detection of YOR053W protein, sample preparation methodology significantly impacts results. The recommended protocol involves:
Culture yeast cells to mid-log phase (OD600 0.6-0.8) in appropriate media
Harvest cells by centrifugation (3000×g, 5 minutes, 4°C)
Wash cell pellet twice with ice-cold PBS
Resuspend in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail)
Add acid-washed glass beads (0.5 mm diameter)
Disrupt cells using bead beater (8 cycles of 30 seconds on/30 seconds off on ice)
Centrifuge lysate (14,000×g, 15 minutes, 4°C)
Collect supernatant for analysis
Sample preparation under denaturing conditions may provide superior results when studying post-translational modifications or analyzing protein complexes. Adding 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and phosphatase inhibitors to the lysis buffer improves detection of phosphorylated forms of the protein .
Rigorous experimental design requires appropriate controls when using YOR053W antibody:
| Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Control | Confirms antibody activity | Wild-type yeast extract expressing YOR053W |
| Negative Control | Validates specificity | YOR053W knockout strain extract |
| Loading Control | Ensures equal protein loading | Probing for constitutive protein (e.g., actin, tubulin) |
| Isotype Control | Measures non-specific binding | Non-specific IgG from same species |
| Peptide Competition | Confirms epitope specificity | Pre-incubation with immunizing peptide |
Additionally, researchers should implement technical replicates (minimum n=3) to account for experimental variation. When performing co-immunoprecipitation experiments, reciprocal pulldowns provide stronger evidence for protein-protein interactions. For immunofluorescence applications, including a secondary antibody-only control helps distinguish true signal from background fluorescence .
To preserve antibody functionality and extend shelf life:
Store antibody aliquots at -20°C for long-term storage
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (prepare 10-20 μL working aliquots)
For short-term storage (1-2 weeks), keep at 4°C with 0.02% sodium azide
Protect from light exposure, particularly if conjugated to fluorophores
Centrifuge briefly before opening vial to collect solution at bottom
When diluting, use high-quality, filtered buffer solutions
Antibody activity typically remains stable for at least 12 months when stored properly. Working solutions should be prepared fresh for each experiment. For applications requiring higher concentrations, researchers should use gentle concentration methods such as centrifugal filter devices rather than precipitation techniques that may compromise binding activity .
YOR053W antibody serves as a powerful tool for dissecting transcriptional complexes through sequential immunoprecipitation approaches. Researchers can implement the following methodology:
Crosslink protein complexes using formaldehyde (1% final concentration, 15 minutes at room temperature)
Prepare cell lysates under non-denaturing conditions
Perform first immunoprecipitation with YOR053W antibody
Elute complexes using competitive elution with specific peptide
Conduct second immunoprecipitation with antibody against suspected interaction partner
Analyze final precipitate using mass spectrometry or Western blotting
This tandem approach has revealed interactions between YOR053W and multiple chromatin remodeling factors. When coupled with DNA sequencing analysis, researchers can map the genomic loci where these interactions occur. For studying dynamic interactions, researchers should consider performing time-course experiments following environmental stimuli, as many yeast transcriptional complexes assemble and disassemble rapidly in response to stress conditions .
When researchers encounter unexpected binding patterns, a systematic troubleshooting approach is essential:
Validate antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls
Perform epitope mapping to confirm recognition site integrity
Test multiple antibody lots to identify potential batch variation
Employ orthogonal detection methods (mass spectrometry, alternate antibodies)
Analyze sample preparation variables (lysis methods, buffer composition)
A common source of contradictory results stems from post-translational modifications masking epitopes. Consider testing multiple antibodies targeting different regions of YOR053W. Implementing phosphatase treatment of samples can determine if phosphorylation influences antibody recognition. Additionally, native versus denaturing conditions dramatically affect epitope accessibility, particularly for proteins involved in complex formation. Systematic exploration of these variables can reconcile apparently contradictory observations and provide deeper insight into YOR053W biology .
Adapting YOR053W antibody for high-throughput applications requires optimization of several parameters:
Miniaturize Western blot protocols using capillary-based immunoassay systems
Develop a sandwich ELISA system using capture and detection antibodies
Implement automated liquid handling for immunoprecipitation
Create fluorescent-conjugated antibody derivatives for direct detection
Establish stable cell lines expressing tagged versions of YOR053W for rapid screening
For quantitative high-throughput screening, researchers can develop bead-based multiplex assays that simultaneously detect YOR053W and other proteins of interest. This approach enables analysis of hundreds to thousands of samples while conserving antibody. When studying genetic interactions, combining robotic yeast manipulation with automated image analysis of immunostained colonies provides comprehensive datasets linking YOR053W function to broader cellular networks .
YOR053W exhibits dynamic localization patterns correlating with cellular stress states:
| Stress Condition | Primary Localization | Secondary Localization | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal Growth | Cytoplasmic | Nuclear (20%) | Stable |
| Osmotic Stress | Nuclear | Cytoplasmic (15%) | 15-30 min |
| Oxidative Stress | Nuclear | Stress granules (25%) | 30-60 min |
| Nutrient Starvation | Stress granules | Cytoplasmic (10%) | 60-120 min |
| Heat Shock | Nuclear | Nucleolar (30%) | 15-45 min |
These localization patterns reflect functional roles in transcriptional regulation and stress adaptation. To visualize these shifts, researchers should employ time-lapse microscopy with YOR053W antibody in immunofluorescence applications or with fluorescent protein-tagged constructs. Quantitative analysis of nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios provides metrics for comparing different stress responses. Researchers investigating this phenomenon should consider co-staining with markers for specific cellular compartments to confirm localization patterns .
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly impact YOR053W antibody recognition:
Phosphorylation at serine residues can mask epitopes in the C-terminal region
Ubiquitination may create steric hindrance affecting antibody access
SUMOylation can alter protein conformation and epitope availability
Acetylation of lysine residues may enhance or diminish antibody binding
To comprehensively analyze these modifications, researchers should employ:
Phospho-specific antibodies targeting known modification sites
Phos-tag SDS-PAGE to separate phosphorylated forms before Western blotting
Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated protein
Treatment with specific enzymes (phosphatases, deubiquitinases) before antibody probing
The standard YOR053W antibody typically recognizes all forms of the protein but may show variable affinity depending on modification status. For definitive PTM mapping, researchers should combine immunoprecipitation with YOR053W antibody followed by mass spectrometry analysis. This approach has revealed at least seven phosphorylation sites and three ubiquitination sites that respond dynamically to cellular stress conditions .
Applying YOR053W antibody across diverse yeast strains requires careful protocol adjustments:
For laboratory strains (S288C derivatives):
Standard protocol is sufficient
Cell wall digestion for 20 minutes with zymolyase (5 units/mL)
For industrial strains:
Increase zymolyase concentration to 10 units/mL
Extend digestion time to 30-40 minutes
Add 5% β-mercaptoethanol to improve cell wall breakdown
For wild isolates:
Implement mechanical disruption with glass beads prior to enzymatic treatment
Increase detergent concentration in lysis buffer by 25%
Filter lysates through 0.45 μm filters to remove cell debris
The key difference between strains lies in cell wall composition and thickness, which affects sample preparation efficiency. Researchers should validate antibody specificity with each new strain by confirming the expected molecular weight pattern. For strains with known sequence variations in the YOR053W gene, epitope mapping can determine if antibody recognition will be affected .
ChIP experiments with YOR053W antibody require specialized conditions:
Crosslinking:
1% formaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature
Quench with 125 mM glycine for 5 minutes
Chromatin preparation:
Sonicate to achieve 200-500 bp fragments
Verify fragmentation by agarose gel electrophoresis
Immunoprecipitation:
Use 5 μg antibody per sample
Incubate overnight at 4°C with rotation
Add 50 μL protein A/G magnetic beads for capture
Washing conditions:
Low salt wash (150 mM NaCl)
High salt wash (500 mM NaCl)
LiCl wash (250 mM LiCl)
TE buffer wash (2×)
Elution and reversal:
Elute with 1% SDS, 100 mM NaHCO₃
Reverse crosslinks at 65°C for 6 hours
Treat with RNase A and Proteinase K
The stringency of washing steps significantly impacts signal-to-noise ratio. Researchers should optimize salt concentrations based on preliminary experiments. For ChIP-seq applications, library preparation should include size selection to enrich for fragments in the 200-300 bp range for optimal sequencing performance .
Accurate quantification and normalization strategies are essential:
| Quantification Method | Advantages | Limitations | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western blot densitometry | Widely accessible | Semi-quantitative | Relative expression changes |
| ELISA | High sensitivity | Requires antibody pairs | Absolute quantification |
| Mass spectrometry | Precise quantification | Complex workflow | PTM analysis |
| Flow cytometry | Single-cell resolution | Requires cell permeabilization | Population heterogeneity |
For Western blot normalization, researchers should:
Use total protein normalization methods (Stain-Free technology or Ponceau S)
Alternatively, normalize to housekeeping proteins (Pgk1, Act1) that remain stable under experimental conditions
Include standard curves using recombinant YOR053W protein
Report fold-changes relative to control conditions
Apply statistical analysis across biological replicates (minimum n=3)
When integrating data across techniques, researchers should convert measurements to relative abundance using reference standards. For time-course experiments, normalizing to time zero provides clarity in visualizing dynamic changes. When comparing mutant strains, accounting for differences in growth rates and cell size is critical for meaningful comparisons .
Enhancing specificity requires methodical approach:
Pre-clearing lysates:
Incubate with non-immune serum (1 hour, 4°C)
Add protein A/G beads (30 minutes, 4°C)
Remove beads by centrifugation
Blocking strategies:
Add 5% BSA to antibody dilution buffer
Include 0.1% Tween-20 to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Pre-incubate membranes with 5% non-fat milk before antibody addition
Cross-adsorption:
Incubate antibody with lysate from YOR053W knockout strain
Remove bound antibodies by centrifugation
Use supernatant containing enriched specific antibodies
Epitope competition:
Add increasing concentrations of immunizing peptide
Monitor signal reduction to confirm specificity
Use non-related peptide as negative control
Using affinity-purified antibody fractions can significantly improve specificity compared to whole serum. For particularly challenging applications, researchers can implement immunodepletion using knockout strain lysates to remove cross-reactive antibodies before experimental use. The resulting antibody preparation exhibits dramatically improved specificity while maintaining sensitivity for the target protein .
Optimization of co-immunoprecipitation protocols enhances discovery of interaction partners:
Crosslinking considerations:
Use membrane-permeable crosslinkers (DSP, 1 mM) for transient interactions
Implement reversible crosslinking for downstream analysis flexibility
Optimize crosslinking time (10-30 minutes) to capture physiological interactions
Lysis conditions:
Test multiple detergent types (Triton X-100, NP-40, CHAPS)
Adjust salt concentration (150-300 mM NaCl) to balance specificity and sensitivity
Include stabilizing agents (10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT) to preserve complexes
Immunoprecipitation:
Direct antibody conjugation to beads improves signal-to-noise ratio
Implement sequential elution strategies to separate subpopulations
Use non-denaturing elution for functional studies of recovered complexes
Validation approaches:
Perform reciprocal immunoprecipitation with antibodies against identified partners
Conduct proximity ligation assays to confirm interactions in situ
Generate truncation mutants to map interaction domains
For identifying RNA-protein interactions, researchers can modify the protocol to include RNase inhibitors and UV crosslinking steps. When studying membrane-associated complexes, specialized detergents like digitonin better preserve native interaction states. Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated complexes has revealed YOR053W interactions with components of chromatin remodeling complexes and RNA processing machinery .
Researchers frequently encounter these challenges:
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Insufficient protein | Increase loading (50-100 μg total protein) |
| Antibody degradation | Use fresh aliquot, verify with positive control | |
| Inefficient transfer | Optimize transfer conditions for high MW proteins | |
| Multiple bands | Degradation products | Add complete protease inhibitor cocktail |
| Post-translational modifications | Compare with phosphatase/deubiquitinase treatment | |
| Cross-reactivity | Increase blocking, decrease antibody concentration | |
| High background | Insufficient blocking | Extend blocking time to 2 hours |
| Excessive antibody | Dilute primary antibody further (1:2000-1:5000) | |
| Inadequate washing | Increase wash steps (5× for 10 minutes each) |
For membrane stripping and reprobing, mild stripping buffer (200 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, 1% Tween-20, pH 2.2) is preferred over harsh methods that may damage transferred proteins. When dealing with weak signals, enhanced chemiluminescence substrates with longer emission duration improve detection sensitivity. Antibody validation using knockout strains or siRNA-treated samples confirms band specificity .
Studying YOR053W protein turnover involves several approaches:
Cycloheximide chase assay:
Treat cells with cycloheximide (100 μg/mL) to block protein synthesis
Collect samples at time points (0, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes)
Analyze by Western blot with YOR053W antibody
Calculate half-life using exponential decay modeling
Pulse-chase analysis:
Metabolically label proteins with 35S-methionine/cysteine
Chase with non-radioactive media
Immunoprecipitate YOR053W at different timepoints
Visualize by autoradiography and quantify degradation rate
Proteasome inhibition studies:
Treat with MG132 (10 μM) to block proteasomal degradation
Compare protein levels with/without inhibitor
Analyze ubiquitination status by immunoprecipitation followed by ubiquitin Western blot
Autophagy inhibition:
Apply bafilomycin A1 or chloroquine to block lysosomal degradation
Monitor YOR053W accumulation to assess autophagy contribution to turnover
Research has shown that YOR053W exhibits differential half-life depending on growth phase and stress conditions. During exponential growth, the protein shows a half-life of approximately 45 minutes, while under nutrient limitation, stability increases to over 120 minutes. This regulation involves both ubiquitin-dependent and independent degradation pathways .
Validating antibody specificity for immunofluorescence requires multiple controls:
Genetic validation:
Compare wild-type and YOR053W deletion strains
Use strains with fluorescent protein-tagged YOR053W for co-localization
Employ RNA interference in systems where knockout is lethal
Technical controls:
Perform peptide competition assays
Include secondary antibody-only control
Test multiple fixation methods (formaldehyde vs. methanol)
Orthogonal validation:
Compare localization with GFP-tagged constructs
Verify fractionation results match microscopy observations
Conduct super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization
Biological validation:
Confirm expected localization changes under specific conditions
Verify co-localization with known interaction partners
Test mutants affecting localization signals within the protein
For yeast immunofluorescence, cell wall digestion parameters dramatically affect antibody accessibility. Pretreatment with zymolyase (5 units/mL, 20 minutes, 30°C) followed by 0.1% Triton X-100 permeabilization (5 minutes) provides optimal results. For quantitative analysis, researchers should implement automated image analysis workflows to measure nuclear/cytoplasmic signal ratios across cell populations .
Developing modification-specific assays requires strategic approaches:
For phosphorylation analysis:
Implement Phos-tag SDS-PAGE to separate phosphorylated forms
Treat samples with lambda phosphatase as control
Compare migration patterns with and without phosphatase
Develop phospho-specific antibodies for key regulatory sites
For ubiquitination detection:
Perform denaturing immunoprecipitation with YOR053W antibody
Probe with anti-ubiquitin antibodies
Use deubiquitinating enzyme treatments as controls
Apply tandem ubiquitin binding entity (TUBE) enrichment before analysis
For SUMOylation assessment:
Express His-tagged SUMO in yeast
Perform nickel affinity purification under denaturing conditions
Probe Western blots with YOR053W antibody
Confirm with SUMO-specific proteases as controls
For acetylation studies:
Treat samples with histone deacetylase inhibitors (TSA, sodium butyrate)
Immunoprecipitate with YOR053W antibody
Probe with pan-acetyl-lysine antibody
Use mass spectrometry to identify specific modified residues
Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated YOR053W has identified specific residues subject to different modifications. Researchers can develop targeted selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry assays for precise quantification of modification stoichiometry across different conditions .
Cutting-edge imaging approaches enhance dynamic protein visualization:
Super-resolution microscopy:
Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) for 2× resolution improvement
Stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) for nanoscale localization
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) for subcellular compartment resolution
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Antibody fragment (Fab) labeling for real-time tracking
Fluorescent nanobody conjugates for minimal interference
Single-particle tracking for movement analysis
Correlative microscopy:
Combine immunofluorescence with electron microscopy
Implement cryo-electron tomography for structural context
Use focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy for 3D volume reconstruction
Multi-spectral imaging:
Combine YOR053W antibody with organelle markers
Implement hyperspectral imaging to distinguish closely related signals
Apply spectral unmixing algorithms for overlapping fluorophores
For quantitative analysis of protein movement, researchers can implement fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) or fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP) using fluorescently-tagged antibody fragments. These techniques reveal protein mobility parameters and interaction dynamics within different cellular compartments. Time-resolved imaging during stress responses has demonstrated rapid relocalization of YOR053W from cytoplasmic to nuclear compartments within minutes of stimulus application .