SPCC126.01c is a protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast), specifically in strain 972 / ATCC 24843. This protein is studied in S. pombe as part of fundamental research into eukaryotic cellular processes. S. pombe serves as an excellent model organism for studying eukaryotic cell biology because of its genetic tractability and similarity to human cells in certain key cellular mechanisms.
The SPCC126.01c protein (UniProt accession: O94394) is targeted by researchers investigating various cellular processes in fission yeast . The antibody against this protein enables localization and functional studies that provide insights into basic cellular mechanisms conserved across eukaryotes.
The commercially available SPCC126.01c antibody (product code: CSB-PA530894XA01SXV) has the following specifications:
| Characteristic | Specification |
|---|---|
| Type | Polyclonal Antibody |
| Host | Rabbit |
| Immunogen | Recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) SPCC126.01c protein |
| Species Reactivity | Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) |
| Tested Applications | ELISA, Western Blot |
| Form | Liquid |
| Storage Buffer | Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300, Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 |
| Purification Method | Antigen Affinity Purified |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C or -80°C (avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles) |
| Lead Time | Made-to-order (14-16 weeks) |
This antibody is designed for research use only and not for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures .
For optimal maintenance of SPCC126.01c antibody activity, follow these storage guidelines:
Upon receipt, immediately store the antibody at -20°C or -80°C for long-term storage .
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can degrade antibody quality and reduce binding efficiency .
For working aliquots, store at 4°C for up to one month, but prepare small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles.
The antibody is supplied in 50% glycerol with PBS (pH 7.4) and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative, which helps maintain stability during storage .
When removing from freezer storage, allow the antibody to thaw completely at 4°C before use.
Improper storage can lead to decreased sensitivity in applications like Western blotting and ELISA, potentially yielding inconsistent or false-negative results.
The optimal Western blotting protocol for SPCC126.01c antibody should include the following methodological steps:
Sample Preparation:
Extract total protein from S. pombe cells using a buffer containing protease inhibitors
Determine protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay
Prepare 20-50 μg of protein per lane in reducing sample buffer
Gel Electrophoresis:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE depending on the molecular weight of SPCC126.01c
Run at 100-120V until adequate separation
Transfer:
Transfer proteins to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight at 4°C
Verify transfer efficiency with Ponceau S staining
Blocking:
Block membrane with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary Antibody Incubation:
Dilute SPCC126.01c antibody at 1:500 to 1:2000 in blocking buffer
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Washing:
Wash membrane 3-4 times with TBST, 5-10 minutes each
Secondary Antibody Incubation:
Use anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at 1:5000 to 1:10000 dilution
Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature
Detection:
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent
Expose to X-ray film or use an imaging system for detection
This protocol should be optimized based on the specific laboratory conditions and the nature of the samples being analyzed.
When troubleshooting weak or absent signals with SPCC126.01c antibody in Western blots, consider these methodological approaches:
Protein Expression Level:
Confirm that SPCC126.01c is expressed under your experimental conditions
Consider enriching the protein using immunoprecipitation before Western blotting
Antibody Dilution:
Test a range of antibody dilutions (e.g., 1:250, 1:500, 1:1000)
Reduce the dilution if signal is weak
Incubation Conditions:
Extend primary antibody incubation to 48 hours at 4°C
Consider incubating with primary antibody for 2-3 hours at room temperature
Protein Loading:
Increase the amount of total protein loaded (50-100 μg)
Verify protein transfer with Ponceau S staining
Membrane Type:
PVDF may provide better sensitivity than nitrocellulose for some applications
Low-fluorescence PVDF membranes may improve signal-to-noise ratio for fluorescent detection
Blocking Reagent:
Test alternative blocking agents (BSA, commercial blockers)
Reduce blocking time if antibody binding may be affected
Detection Method:
Use high-sensitivity ECL substrates for enhanced detection
Consider signal amplification systems for low-abundance proteins
Antibody Quality:
Check antibody expiration date and storage conditions
Test a positive control sample where the target protein is known to be expressed
Sample Preparation:
Ensure complete denaturation of samples
Include protease inhibitors in lysis buffer to prevent degradation
A systematic approach addressing these factors should help identify the source of the weak signal issue.
For effective immunofluorescence using SPCC126.01c antibody in S. pombe, follow this methodological approach:
Cell Fixation and Permeabilization:
Fix exponentially growing S. pombe cells with 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature
Wash cells 3 times with PEM buffer (100 mM PIPES pH 6.9, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4)
Permeabilize cell wall with zymolyase (1 mg/ml) in PEMS buffer (PEM + 1.2 M sorbitol) for 30 minutes at 37°C
Further permeabilize with 1% Triton X-100 in PEM for 5 minutes
Blocking:
Block with PEMBAL (PEM + 1% BSA, 0.1% sodium azide, 100 mM lysine hydrochloride) for 30 minutes
Primary Antibody Incubation:
Dilute SPCC126.01c antibody 1:100 to 1:500 in PEMBAL
Incubate cells overnight at 4°C or 2-3 hours at room temperature
Wash 3 times with PEMBAL, 5 minutes each
Secondary Antibody Incubation:
Use fluorophore-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (e.g., Alexa Fluor 488, 594, or 647) at 1:500 dilution in PEMBAL
Incubate for 1-2 hours at room temperature in the dark
Wash 3 times with PEMBAL
Nuclear Staining:
Counterstain with DAPI (1 μg/ml) for 5 minutes
Wash once with PEM
Mounting and Imaging:
Mount cells in antifade mounting medium
Image using confocal or fluorescence microscopy
Controls:
Include secondary antibody-only control to assess background fluorescence
Include wild-type and gene deletion strains when possible to verify specificity
This protocol should be optimized based on the specific subcellular localization of SPCC126.01c and the microscopy setup available.
When using SPCC126.01c antibody for ChIP experiments, consider these methodological factors:
Crosslinking Optimization:
Test different formaldehyde concentrations (0.75% to 1.5%) and incubation times (10-20 minutes)
For proteins with indirect DNA interactions, consider using protein-protein crosslinkers like DSG before formaldehyde
Chromatin Fragmentation:
Optimize sonication conditions to achieve DNA fragments of 200-500 bp
Verify fragmentation efficiency by agarose gel electrophoresis
Antibody Amount and Quality:
Test different amounts of SPCC126.01c antibody (2-10 μg per ChIP)
Use high-quality, ChIP-validated SPCC126.01c antibody when possible
Consider antibody batch variation if reproducibility issues arise
Preclearing and Controls:
Preclear chromatin with protein A/G beads before antibody addition
Include IgG control, input sample, and positive control (antibody against known DNA-binding protein)
Include a negative control targeting a genomic region not expected to interact with SPCC126.01c
Washing and Elution:
Use stringent washing conditions to reduce background
Optimize elution conditions for efficient recovery of target DNA
Quantification Methods:
Design qPCR primers for regions of interest with amplicon sizes of 80-150 bp
Consider ChIP-seq for genome-wide analysis of binding sites
Data Analysis:
Calculate enrichment as % input or relative to IgG control
For ChIP-seq, use appropriate peak calling algorithms and validate peaks with qPCR
Specific Considerations for SPCC126.01c:
If SPCC126.01c is not a direct DNA-binding protein, consider potential technical challenges
If studying protein complexes, sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) may be necessary
The success of ChIP with SPCC126.01c antibody will depend on the protein's biological role and its proximity to chromatin.
The performance comparison between SPCC126.01c antibody and antibodies against homologous proteins in other model organisms reveals important considerations for cross-species studies:
When planning cross-species studies:
Epitope Conservation Analysis:
Perform sequence alignment of SPCC126.01c with potential homologs
Identify conserved regions that might serve as common epitopes
Request information about the specific epitope recognized by the antibody
Validation Requirements:
Cross-reactivity must be experimentally validated before use in other species
Include positive controls from S. pombe alongside samples from other organisms
Consider using tagged recombinant versions of homologous proteins if antibody cross-reactivity is poor
Application-Specific Considerations:
Western blotting may show cross-reactivity more readily than immunofluorescence
Denatured epitopes (Western blot) may differ from native epitopes (IP, IF)
Higher antibody concentrations may be necessary for non-target species
Alternative Approaches:
For comparative studies, consider using species-specific antibodies for each ortholog
Epitope tagging of homologous proteins may provide a more consistent detection method across species
The SPCC126.01c antibody is specifically raised against and validated for S. pombe, making it most reliable for studies in this organism .
When facing conflicting data from different experimental techniques using SPCC126.01c antibody, implement this methodological framework for resolution:
Technique-Specific Considerations:
Western Blot vs. Immunofluorescence:
Different epitope accessibility in native vs. denatured conditions
Native protein complexes may mask antibody binding sites
Fixation methods in IF may alter epitope recognition
Immunoprecipitation vs. Western Blot:
Buffer conditions affect antibody-antigen interactions differently
Co-immunoprecipitated proteins may interfere with detection
IP often requires higher antibody affinity than WB
Systematic Validation Approach:
Confirm antibody specificity using genetic controls (deletion strains)
Test multiple commercial SPCC126.01c antibodies targeting different epitopes
Validate with orthogonal methods (e.g., epitope tagging, mass spectrometry)
Data Integration Strategy:
Create a confidence matrix ranking results by technique reliability
Weight data based on appropriate positive and negative controls
Consider biological context when interpreting discrepancies
Methodological Reconciliation:
Modify protocols to standardize conditions across techniques when possible
Adjust antibody concentrations based on technique-specific requirements
Consider native vs. denaturing conditions as a source of discrepancy
Advanced Resolution Approaches:
Use CRISPR/Cas9 to tag endogenous SPCC126.01c with GFP or other tags
Perform functional assays to correlate with antibody-based detection
Consider post-translational modifications or isoforms as sources of conflicting results
| Technique | Common Issue | Resolution Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Multiple bands | Verify specificity with knockout controls; consider degradation products or post-translational modifications |
| Immunofluorescence | Unexpected localization | Compare fixation methods; correlate with GFP-tagged construct |
| ChIP | Low enrichment | Optimize crosslinking; verify protein-DNA interaction through other methods |
| Co-IP | Failure to detect interactions | Try less stringent buffers; consider proximity labeling alternatives |
This systematic approach will help determine whether conflicting data stems from technical limitations or reflects true biological complexity.
To investigate protein-protein interactions involving SPCC126.01c in S. pombe, implement these methodological approaches:
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Protocol Optimization:
Use mild lysis conditions (e.g., 0.5% NP-40 or 1% Triton X-100) to preserve protein complexes
Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors to maintain interaction integrity
Pre-clear lysates with Protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Incubate lysates with SPCC126.01c antibody (4-10 μg) overnight at 4°C
Capture complexes with Protein A/G beads for 2-4 hours
Perform stringent washing (4-5 times) to reduce background
Elute and analyze interacting proteins by Western blot or mass spectrometry
Controls:
IgG control to assess non-specific binding
Input sample (5-10%) to confirm presence of proteins before IP
SPCC126.01c deletion strain as negative control
Proximity-Dependent Labeling:
BioID Approach:
Create fusion of SPCC126.01c with BirA* biotin ligase
Express in S. pombe and supply biotin to culture medium (50 μM, 16-24 hours)
Lyse cells and purify biotinylated proteins using streptavidin beads
Identify labeled proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions using SPCC126.01c antibody in reverse Co-IP
Crosslinking Immunoprecipitation:
Treat cells with membrane-permeable crosslinkers (DSP, formaldehyde)
Lyse cells under denaturing conditions
Perform IP with SPCC126.01c antibody
Identify crosslinked partners by mass spectrometry
Confirm specific interactions by testing candidate interactors
Two-Hybrid Validation:
Use identified interactors in yeast two-hybrid or split-ubiquitin assays
Validate direct interactions through in vitro binding assays with recombinant proteins
Correlate interaction data with co-localization studies using SPCC126.01c antibody
Quantitative Analysis:
Use SILAC or TMT labeling to quantify differential interactions under various conditions
Calculate enrichment ratios compared to controls
Focus on reproducible interactions across replicates
This comprehensive approach will provide robust identification of SPCC126.01c interacting partners and insights into its functional role in S. pombe cellular processes.
When investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) of SPCC126.01c using antibodies, consider these methodological principles:
PTM-Specific Antibody Limitations:
General SPCC126.01c antibody may not distinguish between modified and unmodified forms
Consider generating or acquiring PTM-specific antibodies for direct detection
Validate PTM-specific antibodies using appropriate controls (e.g., phosphatase-treated samples)
Enrichment Strategies:
Phosphorylation Analysis:
Use phosphatase inhibitors during cell lysis (50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate)
Enrich phosphorylated proteins using metal oxide affinity chromatography (MOAC) or phospho-specific antibodies
Detect shifts in molecular weight or mobility using Phos-tag™ SDS-PAGE
Ubiquitination Detection:
Include deubiquitinase inhibitors (NEM, IAA) in lysis buffer
Perform IP with SPCC126.01c antibody under denaturing conditions
Probe Western blots with anti-ubiquitin antibodies
Mass Spectrometry Integration:
Immunoprecipitate SPCC126.01c using validated antibody
Perform in-gel digestion with appropriate proteases (consider multiple proteases for better coverage)
Analyze by LC-MS/MS with PTM-specific fragmentation methods (e.g., HCD, ETD)
Confirm PTM sites with targeted MS approaches (PRM, MRM)
Functional Analysis:
Correlate PTM detection with specific cellular conditions or stresses
Perform site-directed mutagenesis of identified PTM sites
Compare wild-type and mutant phenotypes to establish PTM significance
Technical Challenges and Solutions:
| PTM Type | Common Challenge | Methodological Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | Low stoichiometry | Phosphopeptide enrichment; Phos-tag™ gels |
| Ubiquitination | Rapid turnover | Proteasome inhibitor treatment; denaturing IP |
| Glycosylation | Heterogeneity | Specific glycosidase treatments; lectin enrichment |
| Acetylation | Antibody specificity | MS validation; HDAC inhibitor treatment |
Temporal and Spatial Considerations:
Monitor PTM dynamics during cell cycle or stress responses
Compare PTMs across different subcellular fractions
Use immunofluorescence with PTM-specific antibodies for spatial information
This systematic approach will enable comprehensive characterization of SPCC126.01c post-translational modifications and their functional significance.
Integrating SPCC126.01c antibody with CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in S. pombe enables powerful experimental approaches:
Validation of Genome Editing:
Knockout Verification:
Use SPCC126.01c antibody to confirm absence of protein in CRISPR knockout strains
Compare signal intensity in Western blots between wild-type and knockout strains
Include heterozygous strains to assess dose-dependent expression
Tag Integration Confirmation:
Verify successful integration of epitope tags through dual detection
Use SPCC126.01c antibody alongside tag-specific antibodies (e.g., FLAG, HA)
Confirm maintained protein expression levels after tag integration
Functional Domain Analysis:
Generate domain deletion mutants using CRISPR-Cas9
Use SPCC126.01c antibody to assess expression, stability, and localization
Create a panel of truncation mutants to map antibody epitope
Promoter Modifications:
Replace native promoter with regulatable promoters (e.g., nmt1)
Use antibody to quantify expression changes under different conditions
Correlate expression levels with phenotypic outcomes
Quantitative Analysis Protocol:
Collect samples at defined time points after promoter induction/repression
Use standardized Western blot protocol with loading controls
Quantify band intensity using digital image analysis software
Calculate relative expression normalized to wild-type controls
Advanced Applications:
CRISPRi/CRISPRa:
Implement CRISPR interference or activation to modulate SPCC126.01c expression
Use antibody to measure expression changes and correlate with phenotype
Establish dose-response relationships
Base Editing:
Introduce specific mutations in SPCC126.01c
Use antibody to assess effects on protein stability and interactions
Correlate mutations with functional outcomes
Method Integration Table:
| CRISPR Application | Antibody Role | Methodological Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Knockout | Validation | Western blot of wild-type vs. knockout strains |
| Epitope Tagging | Expression verification | Co-detection with tag antibody and SPCC126.01c antibody |
| Domain Deletion | Functional analysis | Size shift detection; localization changes |
| Promoter Replacement | Expression quantification | Time-course analysis after induction/repression |
| Point Mutations | Stability assessment | Pulse-chase analysis with cycloheximide treatment |
This integrated approach provides robust validation of genome editing while enabling sophisticated functional analysis of SPCC126.01c in S. pombe.