KEGG: spo:SPCP1E11.10
STRING: 4896.SPCP1E11.10.1
SPCP1E11.10 Antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits that specifically targets the SPCP1E11.10 protein from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843), commonly known as fission yeast. This antibody was developed using a recombinant SPCP1E11.10 protein as the immunogen and has been purified via antigen affinity methods .
The target protein (UniProt ID: Q9UU77) is specific to S. pombe, making this antibody a valuable tool for researchers studying this model organism's cellular processes. Unlike antibodies that target human proteins such as SCP1 (synaptonemal complex protein 1) or SCPEP1 (serine carboxypeptidase 1) , this antibody is specifically designed for yeast research applications.
SPCP1E11.10 Antibody has been validated for the following experimental applications:
Western Blotting (WB): Suitable for protein detection and quantification
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Effective for sensitive protein detection
These applications have been specifically tested to ensure identification of the antigen with high specificity . Unlike some more broadly applicable antibodies that work across multiple techniques like immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, the current validation focuses on protein detection methods.
For optimal preservation of antibody activity, SPCP1E11.10 Antibody should be stored at -20°C or -80°C immediately upon receipt. Researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can significantly degrade antibody performance .
The antibody is supplied in liquid form with a storage buffer containing:
0.03% Proclin 300 (preservative)
50% Glycerol
0.01M PBS (pH 7.4)
This formulation helps maintain stability during storage. The inclusion of glycerol prevents complete freezing at -20°C, reducing damage from ice crystal formation that can occur during freeze-thaw cycles.
When designing Western blot experiments with SPCP1E11.10 Antibody, researchers should:
Begin with a titration experiment using multiple concentrations (typically 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000)
Test against both positive controls (S. pombe extracts) and negative controls (extracts from other organisms)
Evaluate signal-to-noise ratio for each concentration
Select the dilution that provides clear specific bands with minimal background
This methodical approach helps establish experimental parameters that maximize specificity while conserving valuable antibody resources. Unlike fixed protocols, antibody concentrations often require optimization for each specific laboratory environment and detection system.
Proper experimental design with SPCP1E11.10 Antibody requires several controls:
| Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Control | Confirms antibody activity | Use verified S. pombe (strain 972) extract |
| Negative Control | Evaluates specificity | Use extracts from non-target species |
| Loading Control | Ensures equal protein loading | Probe for housekeeping protein (e.g., actin) |
| Secondary Antibody Control | Assesses non-specific binding | Omit primary antibody |
| Blocking Peptide Control | Confirms epitope specificity | Pre-incubate antibody with immunogen |
Implementing these controls is critical for producing reliable, reproducible results and properly interpreting experimental outcomes. This approach aligns with rigorous validation practices seen in high-quality antibody characterization, similar to the multi-tiered validation protocols used for clinical antibodies .
For rigorous verification of antibody specificity, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:
Perform immunoprecipitation with SPCP1E11.10 Antibody
Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Confirm presence of SPCP1E11.10 protein and assess co-precipitating proteins
Genetic validation:
Compare antibody reactivity between wild-type and SPCP1E11.10 knockout/knockdown strains
Absence of signal in knockout/knockdown samples confirms specificity
Cross-adsorption experiments:
Pre-adsorb antibody with recombinant SPCP1E11.10 protein
Reduced or eliminated signal confirms epitope-specific binding
These approaches provide multi-dimensional validation of antibody specificity, crucial for interpreting complex experimental results in advanced research settings.
Quantitative analysis of SPCP1E11.10 expression requires careful methodological considerations:
Quantitative Western Blotting:
Use fluorescent secondary antibodies rather than chemiluminescence
Include calibration curves with known quantities of recombinant protein
Employ image analysis software with linear range validation
Normalize to validated loading controls
Quantitative ELISA development:
Establish standard curves using purified recombinant SPCP1E11.10
Determine lower limit of detection and linear range
Validate reproducibility across technical and biological replicates
Account for matrix effects from complex biological samples
These methodologies transform qualitative antibody applications into quantitative tools for measuring protein expression levels. The approach shares conceptual similarities with quantitative assays developed for therapeutic antibody assessment in clinical research .
When facing weak or absent signals, consider this systematic troubleshooting approach:
Antibody Activity Assessment:
Verify storage conditions were maintained
Check antibody expiration date
Test a new antibody aliquot if possible
Sample Preparation Optimization:
Ensure proper cell lysis to release target protein
Consider different extraction buffers to maintain protein antigenicity
Verify protein integrity by SDS-PAGE and total protein staining
Protocol Adjustments:
Increase antibody concentration
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Optimize blocking conditions to reduce competition for binding
Enhance detection sensitivity using amplification systems
Expression Verification:
Confirm SPCP1E11.10 expression in your specific S. pombe strain and growth conditions
Consider RT-PCR to verify mRNA expression before protein analysis
This methodical approach can help identify and resolve common causes of signal problems when working with research antibodies.
When encountering potential cross-reactivity with non-target proteins:
Blocking Optimization:
Test alternative blocking agents (BSA, casein, commercial blockers)
Increase blocking time and concentration
Washing Modifications:
Increase wash buffer stringency (higher salt concentration, addition of detergents)
Extend washing times and increase wash steps
Antibody Dilution Adjustment:
Test higher dilutions to reduce non-specific binding
Consider using antibody diluent formulations with blocking components
Pre-adsorption Strategy:
Pre-adsorb the antibody with proteins from the species causing cross-reactivity
Use acetone powder preparation from non-target tissues for pre-adsorption
Alternative Detection Methods:
If Western blot shows cross-reactivity, try ELISA or vice versa
Consider immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting for higher specificity
These strategies help overcome common cross-reactivity challenges that can complicate the interpretation of experimental results.
For investigating protein-protein interactions involving SPCP1E11.10:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Optimize lysis conditions to maintain protein complexes
Use gentle elution methods to preserve interactions
Confirm results with reciprocal Co-IP using antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Consider crosslinking for transient interactions
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) Development:
Combine SPCP1E11.10 Antibody with antibodies against potential interacting partners
Optimize fixation to preserve protein localization while maintaining epitope accessibility
Include appropriate controls to validate interaction specificity
Pull-down Validation:
Use recombinant SPCP1E11.10 protein for pull-down experiments
Confirm interactions identified by antibody-based methods
Characterize binding domains through truncation studies
These methodologies enable researchers to move beyond simple protein detection and investigate functional protein networks, similar to approaches used in studying complex antibody interactions with target epitopes .
Although not currently validated for ChIP applications, researchers interested in adapting SPCP1E11.10 Antibody for chromatin studies should consider:
Crosslinking Optimization:
Test different formaldehyde concentrations (0.1-1%)
Evaluate alternative crosslinking agents for protein-DNA interactions
Optimize crosslinking time to balance efficiency and reversibility
Sonication Parameters:
Determine optimal sonication conditions to achieve appropriate chromatin fragment size
Verify fragment distribution by agarose gel electrophoresis
Ensure consistent sonication across samples
Antibody Evaluation:
Perform preliminary ChIP using positive control antibodies (e.g., histone modifications)
Test SPCP1E11.10 Antibody at various concentrations
Compare ChIP efficiency to Western blot signal intensity
Controls Implementation:
Include input chromatin controls
Use non-specific IgG as negative control
Consider spike-in controls for normalization
Signal Validation:
Confirm enrichment by qPCR at expected genomic regions
Validate findings with alternative methods (e.g., reporter assays)
This methodical approach allows researchers to explore potential chromatin associations of SPCP1E11.10, extending its research applications beyond conventional protein detection methods.
When evaluating SPCP1E11.10 Antibody against other S. pombe antibodies:
Specificity Comparison:
SPCP1E11.10 Antibody is highly specific for its target protein in S. pombe
Unlike broader spectrum antibodies that recognize conserved proteins across species, this antibody offers high specificity for strain-specific research
The polyclonal nature may provide recognition of multiple epitopes, potentially increasing sensitivity compared to monoclonal alternatives
Application Range:
Research Context:
Particularly valuable for studies focused on SPCP1E11.10 protein function in S. pombe
May be less suitable for cross-species comparative studies due to high specificity
Offers advantages in studies requiring selective protein detection in complex S. pombe extracts
This comparative perspective helps researchers select the most appropriate antibody for their specific research objectives and experimental systems.
Researchers should consider these emerging approaches:
Single-cell Protein Analysis:
Adapting SPCP1E11.10 Antibody for flow cytometry or mass cytometry
Developing protocols for in situ protein detection in individual yeast cells
Combining with DNA content analysis for cell-cycle studies
Spatiotemporal Dynamics:
Optimizing for live-cell imaging applications through recombinant antibody fragments
Developing antibody-based biosensors for real-time protein dynamics
Combining with optogenetic approaches for manipulating protein function
Multi-omic Integration:
Using antibody-based pull-downs for integrated proteomics and genomics
Developing ChIP-seq protocols to map genomic interactions
Correlation of protein levels with transcriptomic data for systems biology approaches
These forward-looking applications represent the frontier of research antibody utilization, similar to advances seen in therapeutic antibody development .