ZNF335 antibodies are immunoglobulin-based reagents designed to bind specifically to the ZNF335 protein, enabling its detection in experimental settings. These antibodies are widely used to investigate ZNF335's roles in:
ZNF335 antibodies identified promoter-binding sites in thymocytes and neural progenitors, revealing its association with genes involved in:
ChIP-seq peaks were enriched at active promoters marked by H3K4me3, confirming ZNF335's role in epigenetic regulation .
ZNF335 binds a bipartite DNA motif (5’-GAGGCG-3’ and 5’-GGGAG-3’) via its zinc finger domains .
Acts as a scaffold linking histone H3K4 methyltransferase complexes to gene promoters (e.g., ASH2L, WDR5) .
ZNF335 antibodies aid in diagnosing and studying mutations linked to:
Autosomal recessive microcephaly: Homozygous variants (e.g., p.Cys467Arg, p.Arg1111His) disrupt ZNF335-REST interactions, causing severe cortical malformations .
Immunodeficiency: Hypomorphic Zfp335 mutations impair naïve T cell maturation, increasing infection susceptibility .
ZNF335 is a nuclear protein with a canonical length of 1342 amino acid residues and a molecular weight of approximately 144.9 kDa in humans. It belongs to the Krueppel C2H2-type zinc-finger protein family and functions as a critical regulator of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation. The protein is also known by synonyms including NRC-interacting factor 1 (NIF1) and zinc-finger/leucine-zipper co-transducer NIF1 . ZNF335 contains multiple conserved zinc finger domains that are essential for its function, with certain residues (like Cys467) being particularly critical within these domains .
ZNF335 predominantly exhibits nuclear subcellular localization, consistent with its role in transcriptional regulation . It is ubiquitously expressed across many tissue types, though its expression is particularly significant in neural tissues given its critical role in neurogenesis and brain development . This nuclear localization is important to consider when designing extraction protocols for ZNF335 detection experiments.
Common research applications for ZNF335 antibodies include:
| Application | Purpose | Common Dilutions |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | Detection of protein in lysates | 1:500-1:2000 |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Visualization in tissue sections | 1:50-1:200 |
| Immunocytochemistry (ICC) | Subcellular localization | 1:50-1:200 |
| Immunoprecipitation (IP) | Protein interaction studies | 2-5 μg per sample |
| ELISA | Quantitative analysis | Assay-dependent |
Most commercially available antibodies are validated for Western blot and ELISA applications, with fewer options for IHC, ICC, or IP methodologies .
Proper validation is essential for generating reliable data with ZNF335 antibodies:
Perform Western blot analysis using positive control lysates from tissues/cells known to express ZNF335 (expect a band at approximately 144.9 kDa)
Conduct knockdown/knockout validation using siRNA, shRNA, or CRISPR techniques to confirm specificity
Implement peptide competition assays to verify epitope specificity
Compare results using multiple antibodies targeting different ZNF335 epitopes
Test on samples from multiple species if cross-reactivity is claimed
Validate across multiple applications if the antibody will be used in diverse experimental contexts
When performing Western blots for ZNF335:
Use appropriate nuclear extraction methods, as standard whole-cell lysis may yield insufficient protein
Include positive controls (brain tissue lysates or neural cell lines)
Be aware of the expected molecular weight (144.9 kDa) and potential post-translational modifications
Optimize transfer conditions for high molecular weight proteins
Consider longer exposure times, as ZNF335 may be expressed at lower levels in some tissues
Use gradient gels (4-12%) to achieve better resolution of this large protein
Essential controls include:
Positive tissue controls (brain tissue with known ZNF335 expression)
Negative controls (tissues with minimal ZNF335 expression or knockdown samples)
Secondary antibody-only controls to assess background
Isotype controls to evaluate non-specific binding
For developmental studies, include samples from multiple timepoints
When studying variants, include wild-type samples for comparison
ZNF335 has two reported isoforms resulting from alternative splicing . When selecting antibodies:
Identify the epitope location on ZNF335 and determine if it's present in all isoforms
Choose antibodies that target common regions if general ZNF335 detection is desired
For isoform-specific detection, select antibodies targeting unique regions
Be aware that isoforms may have different expression patterns across tissues or developmental stages
Consider that functional differences between isoforms may affect interpretation of results
Given ZNF335's critical role in neurogenesis:
Include brain region-specific controls when examining expression patterns
Consider developmental timepoints carefully, as ZNF335 function varies throughout neurodevelopment
When studying microcephaly models, compare ZNF335 expression/localization between normal and affected tissues
Implement co-staining with neuronal markers to assess ZNF335's relationship with specific neural populations
For studies involving ZNF335 variants, verify that your antibody still recognizes the mutated protein
To ensure specificity:
Select antibodies that target unique regions of ZNF335 rather than conserved zinc finger domains
Perform sequence alignments to identify regions with low homology to other family members
Validate specificity by testing on samples with overexpressed ZNF335 versus related family members
Use knockdown controls to confirm signal specificity
Analyze molecular weight carefully, as many zinc finger proteins have distinct sizes
The literature describes several pathogenic variants in ZNF335, including p.Cys467Arg, p.Tyr502Cys, p.Phe724del, and others . These variants affect antibody selection:
Variants within the antibody's epitope may reduce or eliminate binding
Some variants affect splicing (e.g., c.3332G>A and potentially c.3998A>G), potentially removing entire epitope regions
Conformational changes from mutations may mask epitopes distant from the mutation site
For studying samples with known ZNF335 variants:
Select antibodies targeting regions distant from known mutation sites
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Verify antibody recognition using recombinant proteins containing the specific variants
Brain tissue analysis presents unique challenges:
Fixation sensitivity: Over-fixation may mask epitopes
High background due to brain tissue autofluorescence
Nuclear localization requiring proper permeabilization
Varying expression across brain regions and developmental stages
In disease states like microcephaly, protein expression/localization may be altered
For optimal results:
Test multiple antigen retrieval methods
Use appropriate blocking solutions to reduce non-specific binding
Consider fresh-frozen versus fixed tissue preparation methods
When investigating ZNF335 in microcephaly research:
| Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Wild-type controls | Baseline comparison | Age-matched, same brain region |
| Known variant samples | Positive controls | Samples with characterized ZNF335 variants |
| Developmental controls | Temporal analysis | Samples from multiple developmental stages |
| Regional controls | Spatial analysis | Multiple brain regions for comparison |
| Technical controls | Methodology validation | Secondary antibody-only, isotype controls |
Additionally, combine protein detection with genetic analysis since biallelic ZNF335 variants cause a spectrum of microcephaly phenotypes ranging from severe (with structural brain anomalies) to milder presentations with hypomyelination .
For successful ZNF335 immunoprecipitation:
Use nuclear extraction protocols since ZNF335 is primarily nuclear
Consider cross-linking to capture transient interactions
Test different lysis/wash buffers to maintain protein-protein interactions
Select antibodies that don't interfere with known protein interaction domains (e.g., the C-terminal portion integral for DBC-1 interaction)
Thoroughly pre-clear lysates to reduce non-specific binding
For co-IP studies, include RNase treatment controls if RNA-mediated interactions are suspected
When investigating ZNF335's role in neurodevelopment:
Combine protein detection with functional assays (e.g., reporter assays for transcriptional activity)
Consider temporal analysis across developmental stages
Use in vitro differentiation models (such as neural progenitor cells) to study ZNF335's role in neurogenesis
Implement knockdown/overexpression studies to assess functional consequences
For microcephaly studies, analyze both cell proliferation and differentiation endpoints
Consider the effects of ZNF335 variants on protein-protein interactions, as mouse models with null mutations are embryonically lethal
When encountering contradictory results:
Verify antibody specificity using multiple validation methods
Consider that different ZNF335 isoforms may be detected by different antibodies
Assess if differences in sample preparation could affect results (fixation, extraction methods)
Determine if developmental timing or brain region differences could explain disparate findings
Examine if the specific ZNF335 variants being studied have different functional consequences
Compare results with published phenotypes from patients with biallelic ZNF335 variants, which range from severe congenital microcephaly with structural brain anomalies to milder presentations