This antibody targets ZNF560, a protein potentially involved in transcriptional regulation.
ZNF560 (Zinc Finger Protein 560) is a transcriptional regulatory protein belonging to the zinc finger protein family. It is predicted to enable DNA-binding transcription repressor activity and RNA polymerase II-specific transcription regulatory functions. The protein contains zinc finger domains that facilitate nucleic acid binding, allowing it to interact with specific DNA sequences and potentially regulate gene expression. While its exact function is still being elucidated, experimental evidence suggests it plays significant roles in cellular processes related to cell cycle regulation, particularly in pathological contexts such as cancer development .
ZNF560 expression has been documented across multiple tissue types, with particularly notable expression in both normal and cancerous tissues. Analysis of TCGA database through UALCAN revealed significant ZNF560 mRNA expression elevation in several human solid tumors, particularly in:
PRAD (Prostate adenocarcinoma)
SARC (Sarcoma)
THCA (Thyroid carcinoma)
THYM (Thymoma)
The protein shows distinct expression patterns between normal and malignant tissues, with osteosarcoma tissues consistently demonstrating elevated expression levels compared to non-tumoral paired samples . Immunohistochemical studies have confirmed its presence in both nuclear and cytoplasmic regions of osteosarcoma cells .
ZNF560 antibodies have been validated for multiple experimental applications, though specific validations vary by manufacturer and antibody clone:
Researchers should verify each antibody's specific validation data, as different clones may perform optimally under different conditions .
ZNF560 demonstrates significant prognostic value in osteosarcoma. Through comprehensive analysis of both GEO and TCGA databases, researchers have verified increased expression of ZNF560 in osteosarcoma tissues, which strongly correlates with unfavorable clinical outcomes . Specifically:
Similar correlations have been observed in other malignancies, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), indicating ZNF560 may serve as a pan-cancer prognostic biomarker .
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) comparing high versus low ZNF560 expression groups has revealed significant enrichment in multiple critical cellular pathways:
Cell cycle regulation pathways
Cell cycle mitotic processes
Cell cycle checkpoints
Experimental knockdown of ZNF560 in osteosarcoma cell lines resulted in:
Decreased expression of cell cycle regulators including PCNA, UBE2C, CDCA5, CDK4, and CDK6
Significant reduction in cell viability
Diminished colony formation capability
Increased apoptosis
These findings collectively suggest ZNF560 functions as an oncogene that promotes tumor progression through regulation of cell cycle progression, apoptotic resistance, and enhanced cellular motility .
Researchers have employed multiple complementary techniques to elucidate ZNF560's role in cancer cell migration and invasion:
Wound healing assay: ZNF560 knockdown via siRNA in both HOS and MG63 osteosarcoma cell lines resulted in profound impairment of cell migration into the wound area compared to control cells transfected with scramble RNA .
Transwell migration assay: Quantitative analysis demonstrated that the proportion of ZNF560-knockdown cells that migrated through the membrane was significantly lower compared to control cells, confirming ZNF560's essential role in facilitating motility of human osteosarcoma cells .
Gene expression analysis: Following ZNF560 knockdown, researchers observed downregulation of multiple genes associated with cell motility and metastatic potential, supporting a mechanistic role for ZNF560 in regulating cancer cell invasion .
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models: While not yet fully implemented, researchers have proposed establishing PDX mice models to further elucidate ZNF560's role in tumor formation and metastasis in vivo .
Comparative gene analysis between high and low ZNF560 expression cohorts has identified several zinc finger proteins with similar expression patterns, including ZNF229 and ZNF728, suggesting potential cooperative or compensatory regulatory networks . While direct protein-protein interactions have not been fully characterized, preliminary evidence suggests ZNF560 may be involved in the transcriptional regulation of the cyclin family .
The zinc finger protein family comprises one of the most prevalent regulatory protein families, with members like ZNF233 and ZNF331 serving as tumor biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer, respectively . ZNF560 likely functions within this broader regulatory network, potentially through:
Direct binding to promoter regions of target genes
Interaction with chromatin remodeling complexes
Competition or cooperation with other transcription factors
Recruitment of co-activators or co-repressors to specific genomic loci
Based on published research methodologies, the following protocol has been successfully employed for ZNF560 immunohistochemical analysis:
Tissue preparation:
Fix tissues in formalin
Embed in paraffin
Section at appropriate thickness (typically 4-5 μm)
Deparaffinization and rehydration:
Deparaffinize sections in xylene
Rehydrate through graded ethanol series
Antigen retrieval and blocking:
Treat with 3% hydrogen peroxide to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity
Apply appropriate blocking agent to minimize nonspecific binding
Primary antibody incubation:
Incubate overnight at 4°C with anti-ZNF560 primary antibody (1:200 dilution)
Several validated antibodies are available (e.g., Biorbyt orb26621)
Secondary antibody and detection:
Incubate with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200 dilution) at room temperature for 1 hour
Incubate with peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and diaminobenzidine
Counterstain with hematoxylin
Scoring method:
Successful ZNF560 knockdown has been achieved using RNA interference approaches:
siRNA transfection:
shRNA stable knockdown:
Validation of knockdown efficiency:
Rigorous experimental design for ZNF560 studies should incorporate multiple control strategies:
Expression controls:
Positive control tissues/cells with known ZNF560 expression (e.g., osteosarcoma cell lines)
Negative control tissues/cells with minimal ZNF560 expression
Gradient of expression samples for quantitative studies
Antibody controls:
Isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding
Secondary antibody-only controls to evaluate background signal
Peptide competition assays to confirm antibody specificity
Knockdown/overexpression controls:
Scramble RNA controls for siRNA experiments
Empty vector controls for overexpression studies
Serial dilution of knockdown/overexpression constructs to establish dose-response relationships
Data analysis controls:
When working with ZNF560 antibodies, several strategies can minimize non-specific binding:
Antibody selection considerations:
Blocking optimization:
Experiment with different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)
Extend blocking times for challenging samples
Consider adding 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Dilution optimization:
Validation approaches:
Researchers analyzing ZNF560 expression across cancer types should consider several important factors:
Tissue-specific expression patterns:
Methodological variations:
Data integration challenges:
Cancer subtype heterogeneity:
Several promising research directions are advancing our understanding of ZNF560 biology:
Multi-omics integration:
Combining transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenomic data to comprehensively map ZNF560's regulatory network
Identifying direct genomic binding sites through ChIP-seq approaches
Correlating expression with genome-wide methylation patterns
Patient-derived models:
Therapeutic targeting potential:
Structural biology approaches: