FITC (Fluorescein Isothiocyanate) is a fluorescent dye covalently linked to antibodies via primary amines (e.g., lysine residues) to enable visualization in fluorescence-based assays . FITC-conjugated antibodies are critical for applications like flow cytometry, immunofluorescence microscopy, and FACS analysis, where precise localization and quantification of target proteins are required.
ZWINT (ZW10 Interactor) is a kinetochore-associated protein critical for spindle checkpoint signaling and microtubule attachment during mitosis . Overexpression of ZWINT has been implicated in cancer progression, including prostate, cervical, and glioblastoma, by promoting cell proliferation and immune evasion .
Antibody Preparation
FITC Reaction
Purification
Parameter | Target Value | Assay Method |
---|---|---|
F/P Ratio | 3–6 | UV-Vis spectrophotometry |
Purity | >90% | SDS-PAGE |
Activity | ≥50% retention | ELISA/Western blot |
Proliferation Assays: Monitor ZWINT expression in cancer cells (e.g., cervical, melanoma) to assess mitotic activity .
Prostate Cancer: High ZWINT expression correlates with poor prognosis (AUC = 0.828) .
Cervical Cancer: ZWINT knockdown reduces migration/invasion via p53/p21 upregulation .
ZWINT (ZW10 Interacting Protein) serves as a critical component of the outer kinetochore KNL1 complex that mediates microtubule-kinetochore interactions during cell division. It functions as a docking point for spindle assembly checkpoint components . ZWINT plays a crucial role in chromosome segregation by helping to establish the physical connection between centromeric DNA and spindle microtubules, thereby ensuring genomic stability . The protein works closely with other kinetochore components such as ZW10 and Rod to monitor and regulate the attachment of spindle microtubules, preventing aneuploidy during cell division .
ZWINT interacts with multiple protein complexes at the kinetochore. Notably, it resides in separate complexes from its binding partner ZW10. While ZW10 exists in a complex with Rod and Zwilch, ZWINT is part of a distinct complex of structural kinetochore components that includes Mis12 and Ndc80-Hec1 . Despite this separation, ZWINT serves as a critical linker between these complexes. Immunoprecipitation studies have shown that a small but significant fraction of ZW10 remains associated with ZWINT under experimental conditions . This interaction is functionally important, as ZWINT is essential for recruiting the ZW10 complex to unattached kinetochores during mitosis .
Disruption of ZWINT function leads to severe mitotic defects due to its essential role in the spindle assembly checkpoint. When ZWINT is depleted (to approximately 15% of normal levels), ZW10 fails to localize to kinetochores . This disruption compromises mitotic checkpoint signaling, as demonstrated by flow cytometry measurements of phospho-histone H3 levels. While control cells show a 10-fold increase in mitotic index after nocodazole treatment, ZWINT-depleted cells show only a 2-fold increase, indicating a severely compromised checkpoint response . This failure in checkpoint function can lead to chromosomal instability, aneuploidy, and potentially contribute to cancer development.
Primary ZWINT antibodies are available in several formats, with polyclonal rabbit antibodies being commonly used in research. For example, the rabbit polyclonal ZWINT antibody (ab71982) has been validated for immunoprecipitation (IP), western blotting (WB), and immunocytochemistry/immunofluorescence (ICC/IF) applications with human samples . When selecting a ZWINT antibody, researchers should consider:
Host species (rabbit antibodies are common for ZWINT detection)
Clonality (polyclonal vs. monoclonal)
Validated applications (IP, WB, ICC/IF, etc.)
Species reactivity (most are validated against human ZWINT)
Immunogen information (synthetic peptide vs. recombinant protein)
The choice between these options depends on the specific experimental requirements and detection methods planned.
FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) conjugation provides a direct fluorescent detection method for visualizing ZWINT localization. Researchers typically employ one of two approaches:
Direct conjugation: Primary ZWINT antibodies directly conjugated to FITC
Indirect detection: Unconjugated primary ZWINT antibodies followed by FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies
The indirect method is more commonly used in research settings. For example, in studies examining ZW10's role in mitotic checkpoint signaling, researchers incubated samples with primary rabbit antibodies against ZWINT followed by FITC-conjugated donkey-anti-rabbit secondary antibodies for one hour on ice and in darkness to preserve fluorescence . This indirect approach offers amplification of signal through multiple secondary antibody binding, enhancing detection sensitivity.
Proper experimental controls are essential when using ZWINT antibodies with FITC detection:
Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
---|---|---|
Negative control | Account for non-specific binding | Samples incubated with isotype-matched irrelevant antibody or secondary antibody alone |
Positive control | Confirm antibody functionality | Cell lines known to express ZWINT (e.g., dividing U87-MG or DBTRG-05 cells) |
Specificity control | Validate signal specificity | ZWINT knockdown/knockout samples |
Counterstaining | Confirm subcellular localization | DAPI for nuclei, tubulin antibodies for microtubules/spindle structures |
Signal saturation control | Ensure quantitative accuracy | Serial dilution of antibody to establish linear detection range |
These controls help distinguish true ZWINT signals from background fluorescence and confirm proper functioning of both primary and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies.
The selection of fixation and permeabilization methods significantly impacts ZWINT detection quality:
For optimal ZWINT immunofluorescence at kinetochores:
Preferred fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature preserves protein epitopes while maintaining cellular architecture
Alternative fixation: Methanol fixation (-20°C for 10 minutes) can sometimes provide superior results for nuclear/kinetochore antigens
Permeabilization: 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 for 5-10 minutes is generally effective
Blocking: 3-5% BSA or normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody
Researchers should note that over-fixation can mask epitopes, while insufficient permeabilization may prevent antibody access to nuclear structures where ZWINT localizes during mitosis. Optimization for specific cell types may be necessary, particularly when working with different cancer cell lines that may display altered nuclear architecture .
Optimization of antibody concentrations and incubation conditions is critical for specific ZWINT detection:
Primary antibody dilution: Typically 1:100 to 1:500 depending on antibody concentration and affinity
Incubation conditions: Best results often achieved with overnight incubation at 4°C in a humidified chamber
FITC-conjugated secondary antibody: Usually effective at 1:200 to 1:1000 dilution
Secondary antibody incubation: One hour at room temperature in darkness
Washing steps: At least 3-5 washes with PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 between antibody incubations
Titration experiments should be performed to determine optimal concentrations that maximize signal-to-noise ratio. For co-localization studies, careful selection of fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap is essential when ZWINT detection needs to be combined with other kinetochore markers.
Proper image acquisition ensures accurate representation of ZWINT localization patterns:
Microscope type: Confocal microscopy is preferred for precise localization at kinetochores
Objective: 63× or 100× oil immersion objectives recommended for kinetochore resolution
Z-stack acquisition: Essential for capturing three-dimensional distribution of ZWINT at kinetochores
Exposure settings: Determine optimal exposure to avoid saturation while capturing dynamics of expression
Pinhole settings: Adjust to achieve optical sectioning appropriate for kinetochore structures
Signal-to-noise optimization: Use appropriate filters and detector settings to minimize autofluorescence
ZWINT antibodies are valuable tools for investigating the spindle assembly checkpoint mechanism:
The mitotic checkpoint ensures proper chromosome segregation, and ZWINT plays a key role by linking structural kinetochore components with checkpoint signaling proteins. Research has shown that ZWINT is essential for recruiting the ZW10 complex to kinetochores, which in turn is required for stable binding of the Mad1-Mad2 complex to unattached kinetochores . This cascade ultimately generates the "stop anaphase" inhibitor signal.
Methodological approaches include:
Immunofluorescence with FITC detection to visualize ZWINT localization during different mitotic phases
Co-localization studies with other checkpoint proteins (Mad1, Mad2, BubR1)
Examination of ZWINT dynamics following treatment with spindle poisons like nocodazole
Correlating ZWINT localization patterns with chromosome segregation errors
These approaches have revealed that ZWINT depletion severely compromises mitotic checkpoint signaling, with cells showing only a 2-fold increase in mitotic index after nocodazole treatment compared to the 10-fold increase seen in control cells .
ZWINT overexpression has been observed in multiple cancer types, making it an important research target:
Bioinformatic and tissue array chip analyses have indicated ZWINT overexpression in pancreatic cancer, with expression levels further induced under hypoxic conditions . Similar patterns have been observed in glioblastoma cells. ZWINT appears to promote cancer cell proliferation and cell cycle progression, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target.
Research methodologies include:
Immunohistochemistry with ZWINT antibodies to assess expression in cancer tissues
Quantitative analysis of ZWINT levels in hypoxic versus normoxic conditions
Correlation of ZWINT expression with tumor grade and patient outcomes
Investigation of ZWINT's role in p53/p21 signaling pathways in cancer cells
For example, CHIP assays can evaluate HIF1α interaction with the ZWINT promoter under hypoxic conditions, while immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence can examine interactions between ZWINT, MDM2, and p53 in cancer cells .
ZWINT's role in ensuring proper chromosome segregation makes it valuable for studying chromosomal instability:
Methodological approaches include:
Combined ZWINT immunofluorescence with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to simultaneously visualize kinetochore function and chromosome positioning
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged ZWINT to monitor dynamics during chromosome segregation
Analysis of aneuploidy rates following ZWINT depletion or overexpression
Investigation of ZWINT's interactions with structural kinetochore components like Mis12 and Ndc80-Hec1
Research has demonstrated that disrupting ZWINT function impairs the spindle assembly checkpoint, potentially leading to chromosomal instability. For instance, when ZWINT is depleted, ZW10 fails to localize to kinetochores, compromising the checkpoint that prevents aneuploidy during cell division .
ZWINT demonstrates phase-specific localization and interactions during the cell cycle:
Methodological approaches:
Synchronization strategies:
Double thymidine block for G1/S transition
Nocodazole treatment for prometaphase arrest
RO-3306 for G2 arrest
Co-immunoprecipitation techniques:
Lysates from synchronized cell populations
ZWINT antibodies for pull-down followed by detection of interacting partners
Reciprocal IP with antibodies against suspected interacting proteins
Proximity ligation assays:
Visualization of ZWINT protein interactions in situ
Quantification of interaction frequency during different cell cycle phases
These approaches have revealed that ZWINT forms distinct complexes throughout the cell cycle. For example, ZWINT associates with structural kinetochore components including Mis12, Ndc80-HEC1, Spc24, and AF15q14, while its binding partner ZW10 exists in a separate complex with Rod and Zwilch . These differential interactions appear critical for proper cell cycle progression.
ZWINT dysfunction leads to specific cell cycle abnormalities that can be quantitatively assessed:
Observed defects include:
Compromised mitotic checkpoint signaling
Aberrant kinetochore-microtubule attachments
Chromosome segregation errors
Disrupted cell cycle progression
Quantitative assessment methods:
Flow cytometry: Measuring cell cycle distribution after BrdU incorporation reveals that ZWINT disruption affects G2/M progression. For example, in U87-MG and DBTRG-05 cells treated with camptothecin (which affects the cell cycle), a considerable G2/M arrest was observed (U87 72h/U87 NT: 27.9%/19.6%; DBTRG 72h/DBTRG NT: 33.8%/12.6%) with increased non-cycling S-phase cells .
Time-lapse microscopy: Tracking mitotic duration and chromosome movements
Immunofluorescence: Quantifying lagging chromosomes and micronuclei formation
Gene expression analysis: Evaluating downstream effects on cell cycle regulators
Research indicates that ZWINT dysfunction specifically impacts the spindle assembly checkpoint pathway, with inhibition of BUB1, BUB3, and MAD2 mRNAs observed in senescent U87-MG cells .
ZWINT's function intersects with DNA damage response mechanisms:
Microarray analyses of cells treated with camptothecin (a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces DNA damage) have revealed coordinated changes in gene expression involving both ZWINT and DNA damage response pathways . Functional analysis using High-Throughput GoMINER and EASE tools highlighted that down-regulation of cell cycle and mitosis genes (including ZWINT-related pathways) occurred alongside up-regulation of cell growth inhibition and DNA damage response genes .
Experimental approaches to study this relationship include:
Immunofluorescence co-localization of ZWINT with γH2AX foci after DNA damage
Analysis of ZWINT phosphorylation status following genotoxic stress
Evaluation of ZWINT levels and localization in cells with compromised DNA repair machinery
Chromosome spread analysis to assess structural abnormalities when ZWINT function is impaired
These studies suggest that ZWINT may function as an integration point between kinetochore attachment sensing and DNA damage response pathways, potentially explaining its involvement in both cancer progression and treatment response.
Researchers may encounter several challenges when performing ZWINT immunofluorescence:
Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
---|---|---|
Weak or absent ZWINT signal | Insufficient antibody concentration, epitope masking, cell cycle dependence | Increase antibody concentration, try different fixation methods, ensure mitotic enrichment |
High background fluorescence | Inadequate blocking, excessive antibody, non-specific binding | Optimize blocking conditions, titrate antibody, include detergents in wash buffers |
Poor kinetochore resolution | Suboptimal microscopy settings, inadequate fixation | Use confocal microscopy, optimize fixation to preserve kinetochore structure |
Inconsistent staining patterns | Cell cycle variability, heterogeneous cell population | Synchronize cells, use cell cycle markers for proper classification |
Cross-reactivity with other proteins | Antibody specificity issues | Validate with ZWINT-depleted controls, consider different antibody clones |
When troubleshooting, remember that ZWINT localization is highly cell cycle-dependent, with strong kinetochore signals primarily visible during prometaphase. In unsynchronized populations, only a small percentage of cells will show clear kinetochore localization.
Enhancing antibody specificity for ZWINT detection:
Antibody validation strategies:
siRNA/shRNA ZWINT knockdown as negative controls
Peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity
Western blot validation before immunofluorescence applications
Testing multiple ZWINT antibody clones targeting different epitopes
Signal enhancement approaches:
Tyramide signal amplification for low abundance detection
Optimized antigen retrieval for fixed samples
Use of high-sensitivity detection systems
Background reduction techniques:
Pre-adsorption of antibodies with acetone powder from non-expressing tissues
Extended blocking with serum plus BSA combinations
Inclusion of non-ionic detergents in antibody diluents
These optimization approaches are particularly important when studying ZWINT in complex samples or when examining subtle changes in ZWINT localization patterns during different cellular states.
Accurate quantification of ZWINT requires careful methodological considerations:
Normalization strategies:
Internal loading controls for Western blot (housekeeping proteins)
Reference genes for qRT-PCR (validated through stability testing)
Cell-by-cell normalization for immunofluorescence intensity
Cell cycle considerations:
Account for cell cycle-dependent expression/localization
Use cell cycle markers (pH3, PCNA, cyclin B) for subpopulation analysis
Consider synchronization for homogeneous populations
Statistical approaches:
Determine appropriate sample sizes through power analysis
Apply nonparametric statistics for heterogeneous distributions
Use mixed-effects models for experiments with multiple sources of variation
Image analysis parameters:
Define consistent thresholding methods for signal quantification
Implement automated analysis pipelines to reduce bias
Include spatial distribution metrics beyond simple intensity measurements
For example, in microarray analysis of ZWINT expression changes, researchers have employed MAANOVA (MicroArray ANalysis Of VAriance) with appropriate statistical filtering to identify significant changes in gene expression during time-course treatments .
Integrating ZWINT antibody approaches with live-cell imaging:
While traditional antibody-based detection requires fixed cells, researchers can combine fixed and live approaches to gain comprehensive insights:
Sequential live-fixed imaging:
Track live cells expressing fluorescent markers (e.g., H2B-GFP)
Fix at specific time points or after observed events
Perform ZWINT immunofluorescence with FITC or other compatible fluorophores
Relocate previously imaged cells for correlative analysis
Antibody fragment approaches:
Generate Fab fragments from ZWINT antibodies
Fluorescently label fragments for live-cell introduction
Use cell-penetrating peptides or microinjection for delivery
Complementary marker strategies:
Express fluorescently-tagged binding partners of ZWINT in live cells
Correlate live dynamics with fixed ZWINT localization
Use inducible expression systems to avoid artifacts
These approaches can reveal how ZWINT dynamics correlate with cellular events such as checkpoint activation, chromosome alignment, and anaphase onset.
Integrating ZWINT antibody techniques with broader omics approaches provides comprehensive insights:
Proteomics integration:
Immunoprecipitation with ZWINT antibodies followed by mass spectrometry
Identification of cell cycle-specific interaction networks
Phosphoproteomic analysis of ZWINT and associated proteins
Transcriptomics correlation:
Combine ZWINT protein levels with gene expression profiles
Identify transcriptional networks affected by ZWINT disruption
Compare normal vs. cancer tissues for ZWINT-associated signatures
Chromatin association studies:
ChIP-seq with ZWINT-interacting transcription factors
Analysis of chromosome structural abnormalities following ZWINT depletion
Integration with Hi-C data to assess chromosome territory organization
Multi-omics approaches have revealed that ZWINT function extends beyond its structural role at kinetochores. For example, gene expression analysis in camptothecin-treated glioblastoma cells demonstrated that ZWINT disruption affects pathways including DNA metabolism, mitosis regulation, and inflammation response .
ZWINT's emerging role in cancer biology presents opportunities for therapeutic research:
Predictive biomarker potential:
Quantitative assessment of ZWINT expression in patient samples
Correlation with treatment outcomes for specific therapeutic modalities
Development of standardized ZWINT immunohistochemistry protocols
Therapeutic targeting approaches:
Antibody-based disruption of ZWINT interactions
Small molecule screening using ZWINT immunofluorescence as readout
Synthetic lethality screening in ZWINT-overexpressing cancer cells
Resistance mechanism studies:
Analysis of ZWINT expression in treatment-resistant cells
Investigation of ZWINT's role in hypoxia-induced treatment resistance
Combined targeting of ZWINT and DNA damage response pathways
Research has demonstrated that ZWINT is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and induced under hypoxic conditions, where it promotes cancer cell proliferation and cell cycle progression . Additionally, ZWINT has been implicated in camptothecin resistance mechanisms in glioblastoma cells , suggesting its potential importance in chemotherapy response.