ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated, is a bioconjugate combining a primary antibody targeting the ZWINT protein (Zeste White 10 Interactor) with Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP), an enzyme used for signal amplification in immunoassays. This conjugate enables visualization of ZWINT in techniques like ELISA, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and western blotting through chromogenic or chemiluminescent reactions .
Key components:
ZWINT Antibody: A recombinant monoclonal or polyclonal antibody recognizing epitopes within the ZWINT protein (e.g., residues 1–277 or center regions) .
HRP: A 44 kDa glycoprotein with six lysine residues for cross-linking to antibodies, enabling catalytic activity in H₂O₂-dependent reactions (e.g., DAB, TMB substrates) .
The conjugation of HRP to ZWINT antibodies is typically performed using:
Lightning-Link® Kits: Cross-linking strategies that avoid traditional multi-step methodologies, ensuring high efficiency and minimal antibody denaturation .
Stabilizers: Additives like LifeXtend™ HRP protect conjugates from degradation, enhancing stability at room temperature for extended storage .
Critical factors influencing conjugation:
Cancer Type | ZWINT Expression | Prognostic Impact |
---|---|---|
Breast Cancer | High (ER−/PR−/HER2+, TNBC) | Shorter OS (HR=1.73) and MRFS (HR=1.66) |
Cervical Cancer | Upregulated | Promotes proliferation via p53/p21 suppression |
GBM | High | Correlates with invasion and apoptosis resistance |
ZWINT (ZW10 Interactor) is a critical component of the outer kinetochore KNL1 complex that serves as a docking point for spindle assembly checkpoint components and mediates microtubule-kinetochore interactions . It plays essential roles in:
Targeting the RZZ complex to the kinetochore during prometaphase
Activating spindle assembly checkpoint at unattached kinetochores
Recent studies have implicated ZWINT in cancer biology, particularly in breast cancer where its upregulation predicts poor prognosis and promotes cancer cell proliferation via cell cycle regulation .
Based on available product data, ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated is suitable for the following applications:
The HRP conjugation eliminates the need for secondary antibody incubation, streamlining experimental workflows and potentially reducing background signal in certain applications.
ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated should be stored at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt . Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can damage antibody integrity and reduce sensitivity . The antibody is typically supplied in a stabilizing buffer containing:
For short-term use (within 1 month), storage at 4°C is acceptable, but long-term storage should be at -20°C or lower to maintain activity.
For optimal Western blot results with ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated:
Sample preparation: Isolate total protein using RIPA buffer with 1% PMSF protease inhibitor
Protein denaturation: Boil samples with SDS-PAGE buffer for 5 minutes
Membrane selection: Use PVDF membranes for optimal protein binding and signal development
Blocking: Use 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody dilution: Start with a 1:1000 dilution and adjust based on signal intensity
Incubation conditions: Incubate with antibody solution overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Washing: Perform at least 3 washes with TBST, 5-10 minutes each
Detection: Use ECL chemiluminescence detection kit and analyze with a luminescent-image analyzer
Since the antibody is already HRP-conjugated, no secondary antibody is required, which simplifies the protocol and may reduce background.
When working with ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated, the following controls are essential:
Including these controls helps validate experimental findings and troubleshoot potential issues with antibody performance.
For immunohistochemistry applications with ZWINT Antibody, the following parameters should be optimized:
Tissue fixation: Use formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues with appropriate fixation times to preserve epitopes
Deparaffinization and rehydration: Process tissue sections through xylene and graded alcohol series
Antigen retrieval: Use citrate buffer with microwave heating for optimal epitope exposure
Endogenous peroxidase blocking: Treat with H₂O₂ to eliminate background from endogenous peroxidase activity
Antibody dilution: Test a range of dilutions to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Incubation time and temperature: Typically overnight at 4°C or 1-2 hours at room temperature
Detection system: Use an appropriate HRP substrate (DAB, AEC) for visualization
Counterstaining: Apply hematoxylin for nuclear counterstaining to provide context
Optimization should be performed systematically, changing one parameter at a time and documenting results.
To correlate ZWINT expression with cell cycle parameters:
Synchronize cells at different cell cycle phases using:
Double thymidine block (G1/S boundary)
Nocodazole treatment (M phase)
Serum starvation/stimulation (G0/G1)
Monitor cell cycle distribution using flow cytometry analysis with propidium iodide staining
Analyze ZWINT expression in synchronized populations via:
Western blot with ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated
Immunofluorescence to visualize subcellular localization
Co-analyze cell cycle regulators including:
Quantification and correlation:
Plot ZWINT expression levels against percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase
Perform Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis
Use multivariate analysis to account for additional factors
Research has shown that ZWINT promotes breast cancer proliferation via cell cycle regulation, particularly by influencing critical cell cycle regulators involved in G1 phase and G1/S transition .
Recent research has identified ZWINT as a direct target of miR-204 in breast cancer, establishing an important regulatory axis:
miR-204 acts as a tumor suppressor that directly targets ZWINT:
ZWINT upregulation in cancer often occurs due to:
Decreased miR-204 expression in cancer tissues
Amplification of ZWINT gene
Other post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
Experimental validation approaches:
Luciferase reporter assays with wild-type and mutant ZWINT 3′-UTR
miR-204 mimics/inhibitors to modulate ZWINT expression
Western blot analysis of ZWINT protein levels after miR-204 manipulation
Functional consequences:
miR-204 restoration inhibits cancer cell proliferation
ZWINT overexpression can rescue the effects of miR-204
This regulatory axis affects cell cycle progression
This miR-204/ZWINT axis represents a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer and potentially other cancer types where ZWINT is dysregulated .
When encountering non-specific binding with ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated, consider these troubleshooting steps:
Antibody dilution optimization:
Test a titration series (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000)
Higher dilutions typically reduce non-specific binding but may decrease specific signal
Blocking improvements:
Washing optimization:
Increase number of washes
Extend washing duration
Use fresh washing buffer with proper detergent concentration
Sample preparation evaluation:
Ensure proper fixation and antigen retrieval
Consider different antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced vs. enzymatic)
Optimize incubation times and temperatures
Endogenous enzyme activity:
Thoroughly block endogenous peroxidase activity
Use specialized blocking reagents for tissues with high endogenous peroxidase
Antibody specificity verification:
Perform peptide competition assays
Test on known positive and negative control samples
Systematic troubleshooting should involve changing one parameter at a time and documenting results carefully .
For standardized quantification of ZWINT expression in tissue microarrays (TMAs):
Staining evaluation approach:
Staining intensity scoring:
Calculation of immunoreactive score:
Digital image analysis:
Consider using automated image analysis software for more objective quantification
Calibrate software parameters against pathologist scoring
Statistical analysis:
Define appropriate cutoff values to categorize expression as "high" or "low"
Use receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine optimal cutoff values
Apply these categories for survival analysis and clinical correlations
This standardized approach allows for reliable comparison across different samples and studies, facilitating meta-analyses and clinical correlations .
When facing discrepancies between ZWINT mRNA and protein expression levels:
Consider post-transcriptional regulation:
Evaluate methodological differences:
mRNA detection (qPCR, RNA-seq) has different sensitivity than protein detection (Western blot, IHC)
Different antibodies may recognize different epitopes or isoforms
Sample preparation methods may affect detection efficiency
Assess technical variables:
Normalization methods used for mRNA vs. protein quantification
Batch effects in multi-sample analyses
Different detection thresholds between techniques
Biological explanations:
Protein stability and half-life variations
Temporal lag between mRNA expression and protein accumulation
Cell type-specific post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition
Integration approach:
Use multiple detection methods for both mRNA and protein
Include time course experiments to capture expression dynamics
Consider single-cell analyses to account for cellular heterogeneity
Understanding the full spectrum of regulatory mechanisms affecting ZWINT can help explain apparent contradictions between mRNA and protein data.
For robust statistical analysis of ZWINT expression and clinical outcomes:
Univariate survival analyses:
Kaplan-Meier curves to visualize survival differences between ZWINT-high and ZWINT-low groups
Log-rank tests to assess statistical significance of survival differences
Hazard ratios to quantify risk associated with ZWINT expression levels
Multivariate analyses:
Cox proportional hazards models to determine if ZWINT is an independent prognostic factor
Variables to include: age, tumor size, grade, stage, molecular subtype, treatment regimen
Correlation analyses:
Pearson or Spearman correlation for continuous variables
Chi-square tests for categorical variables
ANOVA for comparing ZWINT expression across multiple groups
Predictive modeling:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess predictive value
Area under the curve (AUC) calculation to quantify discriminatory power
Nomograms incorporating ZWINT expression with other clinical factors
Meta-analysis approaches:
Forest plots to visualize effect sizes across multiple studies
Random-effects models to account for inter-study heterogeneity
Publication bias assessment using funnel plots
These statistical approaches provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating the clinical significance of ZWINT expression in cancer research .
ZWINT Antibody can facilitate investigation of kinetochore complex assembly through:
Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Precipitate ZWINT and identify interacting partners
Compare interaction profiles across cell cycle phases
Identify post-translational modifications affecting complex formation
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Proximity ligation assays:
Detect direct protein-protein interactions in situ
Visualize spatial relationships between ZWINT and binding partners
Quantify interaction frequencies in different cellular contexts
ChIP-sequencing applications:
Map ZWINT associations with centromeric regions
Identify DNA sequences involved in kinetochore assembly
Correlate with chromatin modifications at centromeres
CRISPR/Cas9 edited cell lines:
Generate ZWINT mutants affecting specific interactions
Assess consequences on kinetochore assembly and function
Combine with live cell imaging to track dynamic processes
These approaches leverage ZWINT Antibody to elucidate the complex molecular interactions at kinetochores, which are critical for proper chromosome segregation and genome stability .
When designing multiplex immunoassays that include ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated:
Signal separation strategy:
HRP produces a chromogenic or chemiluminescent signal
Must be distinguishable from other detection systems in the multiplex
Consider chromogenic substrates with different colors for HRP vs. other enzymes
Antibody compatibility assessment:
Test for cross-reactivity between antibodies in the panel
Ensure epitopes are accessible in multiplex conditions
Verify antibodies are raised in different host species to avoid cross-reactivity
Optimization protocols:
Titrate each antibody individually before combining
Determine optimal incubation sequences
Test blocking reagents that work for all antibodies in the panel
Sequential detection approach:
Consider detecting HRP-conjugated antibodies first
Implement adequate quenching before subsequent detection steps
Use tyramide signal amplification for enhanced sensitivity when needed
Controls for multiplexed systems:
Single-stain controls to assess signal specificity
Minus-one controls to identify potential interference
Tissue microarrays with known expression patterns for validation
Careful optimization of these parameters ensures reliable results when incorporating ZWINT Antibody, HRP conjugated into multiplex immunoassays.