sCD40L Human, His Active is a 169-amino acid polypeptide (residues 113-261) with an N-terminal 20-amino acid histidine tag, yielding a molecular mass of 18.3 kDa . Key features include:
The histidine tag facilitates purification via immobilized metal affinity chromatography . Unlike native CD40L (a type II transmembrane protein), this soluble variant omits the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains while retaining receptor-binding regions .
sCD40L activates CD40 receptors through trimerization, mimicking natural ligand-receptor interactions . Functional assays demonstrate:
Immune Modulation: Induces B-cell proliferation (EC₅₀: 0.5–2 ng/mL) and enhances immunoglobulin secretion in cytokine-rich environments .
Monocyte Activation: Triggers tumoricidal activity and cytokine production (e.g., IL-12, TNF-α) in peripheral blood monocytes .
Endothelial Effects: Reduces endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression by 61% at 5 μg/mL and increases superoxide anion production in human coronary artery endothelial cells .
Biological validation methods:
Assay Type | Results |
---|---|
ELISA Binding (CD40) | EC₅₀ = 0.8–1.2 ng/mL |
B-Cell Proliferation | 31-fold increase in SCA plasma vs controls |
Sickle Cell Anemia (SCA): Plasma sCD40L levels are 30× higher in SCA patients (1.30 ± 1.74 ng/mL) versus healthy controls (0.04 ± 0.05 ng/mL) . During crises, levels rise further (1.74 ng/mL), correlating with tissue factor (TF) upregulation (R²=0.60) .
Endothelial Dysfunction: At 5 μg/mL, sCD40L decreases mitochondrial membrane potential by 40% and increases NADPH oxidase activity by 2.5× in human coronary endothelial cells .
sCD40L enhances procoagulant activity through:
Application | Experimental Use |
---|---|
Immune Synapse Studies | T-cell/B-cell interaction assays |
Therapeutic Screening | Anti-CD40L antibody validation |
Vascular Biology | Endothelial dysfunction models |
sCD40L exerts effects through:
MAPK/NF-κB Signaling: Phosphorylates p38 (3.2×) and ERK1/2 (2.8×), activating NF-κB within 60 minutes .
microRNA Regulation: Modulates 95 microRNAs, including miR-155 (4.5× upregulation) linked to endothelial apoptosis .
Genetic Modulation: CD40LG haplotypes (e.g., TGGC) increase sCD40L secretion by 1.9 μg/L (P = 0.000009) .
CD40 ligand, CD154, CD40L, gp39, hCD40L, HIGM1, IGM, IMD3, T-BAM, TNFSF5, TRAP.
Escherichia Coli.
MGSSHHHHHH SSGLVPRGSH MQKGDQNPQI AAHVISEASS KTTSVLQWAE KGYYTMSNNL VTLENGKQLT VKRQGLYYIY AQVTFCSNRE ASSQAPFIAS LCLKSPGRFE RILLRAANTH SSAKPCGQQS IHLGGVFELQ PGASVFVNVT DPSQVSHGTG FTSFGLLKL
sCD40L (soluble CD40 ligand) is the extracellular cleaved portion of the membrane-bound CD40 ligand. It exists as a homotrimer of an 18kDa protein that retains full biological activity. While membrane-bound CD40L is primarily expressed on activated CD4+ T cells, basophils, and mast cells, sCD40L circulates freely in the bloodstream .
The soluble form maintains the ability to bind CD40 receptors and exhibits full activity in B cell proliferation and differentiation assays. It can rescue B cells from apoptosis and bind soluble CD40, making it functionally similar to its membrane-bound counterpart despite its different localization and potential sources .
The cellular source distinction is important for researchers to consider when designing experiments and interpreting results, as platelet-derived and T cell-derived sCD40L may have different biological implications, especially in disease contexts.
Research demonstrates significantly elevated serum sCD40L levels in pretreatment cancer patients compared to healthy donors. This difference appears to be disease-related rather than age-dependent, as comparisons between younger (average age 23 years) and older (average age 54 years) healthy donors revealed no age-related differences in serum sCD40L levels .
Studies have reported elevated sCD40L levels in patients with metastasized lung cancer and undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, suggesting a potential role in cancer progression .
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) represents the gold standard for quantifying sCD40L in human samples. The recommended protocol involves:
Sample preparation: For serum samples, use 20μl serum diluted with 80μl sample diluent
Standard curve preparation: Create standard dilutions ranging from 5 to 0.08 ng/ml
Primary incubation: Incubate plates at room temperature (18° to 25°C) for 2 hours
Detection: Add HRP-conjugated monoclonal anti-sCD40L antibody and incubate for 1 hour
Development: Add TMB substrate solution and incubate for approximately 15 minutes
Measurement: Add stop solution and measure absorbance at 450 nm
The assay performance characteristics are summarized in Table 1:
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Limit of detection | 0.005 ng/ml |
Intra-assay coefficient of variation | 5.5% |
Standard curve range | 5 to 0.08 ng/ml |
Several factors can influence the stability and accurate measurement of sCD40L in experimental samples:
Sample handling: Proper collection and processing of blood samples is critical to prevent ex vivo platelet activation, which could artificially increase sCD40L levels
Storage conditions: Minimize freeze-thaw cycles and maintain consistent storage temperature
Assay technique: Follow precise washing and incubation protocols as outlined in the ELISA methodology
Cross-reactivity: Ensure the assay specifically detects human sCD40L without interference from similar molecules
Timing: Process samples consistently since time-dependent variations may occur
For optimal results, researchers should incubate microwell strips at room temperature (18° to 25°C) for precisely 2 hours, ideally on a microplate shaker set at 100 rpm .
When designing experiments to study sCD40L's effects on immune function, researchers should consider:
Source of sCD40L: Use recombinant monomeric sCD40L that mimics the natural protein
Appropriate controls: Include both unstimulated cells and cells exposed to control proteins
Cellular models: PBMCs from both cancer patients and healthy donors should be used for comparison
Dose-response relationships: Test multiple concentrations of sCD40L to identify threshold effects
Time-course experiments: Evaluate both immediate and delayed responses to sCD40L exposure
Combined analysis: Assess changes in cell population frequencies, activation marker expression, and cytokine production
For T-cell stimulation experiments, researchers typically culture PBMCs with anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies with or without sCD40L and measure proliferation, cytokine production, and expression of activation markers .
Research indicates that elevated sCD40L in cancer patients contributes to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment through multiple mechanisms:
MDSC expansion: sCD40L promotes the expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), defined as CD33+HLA-DR- cells, which express higher levels of CD40
Inhibition of T-cell function: Increased MDSCs suppress T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ production when co-cultured with stimulated T cells
Regulatory T cell induction: sCD40L expands the population of regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25highFoxp3+)
Immunosuppressive cytokine production: sCD40L induces production of IL-10 and IL-6, cytokines known to have immunosuppressive properties
PD-1 upregulation: sCD40L enhances expression of programmed death-1 (PD-1) on T cells from cancer patients
IL-12 inhibition: sCD40L inhibits IL-12 production from monocytes upon activation
Parameter | Cancer Patients | Healthy Donors |
---|---|---|
CD40+ MDSCs frequency | 20% | 2% |
MDSC population | Elevated | Baseline |
CD40 expression level on MDSCs | Higher | Lower |
sCD40L appears to contribute to T cell exhaustion, particularly in cancer patients. The research demonstrates that:
PD-1 expression: sCD40L significantly enhances PD-1 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from cancer patients following stimulation, but has minimal effect on T cells from healthy donors
Differential effects: The PD-1 upregulation is much more pronounced in cancer patients, with a 5.5-fold increase in CD4+ T cells and a 9.7-fold increase in CD8+ T cells compared to healthy donors
Activation markers: While sCD40L enhances expression of activation markers like CD25 and CD70 on stimulated T cells, the concurrent upregulation of PD-1 suggests a transition toward an exhausted phenotype
This suggests that the immunosuppressive effects of sCD40L may be context-dependent and particularly relevant in the setting of cancer.
Cell Type | Fold Increase in Cancer Patients | Effect in Healthy Donors |
---|---|---|
CD4+ T cells | 5.5-fold | Minimal |
CD8+ T cells | 9.7-fold | Minimal |
sCD40L significantly alters the cytokine profile of stimulated PBMCs from cancer patients:
IL-10 induction: sCD40L increases production of IL-10, a potent immunosuppressive cytokine that inhibits T cell proliferation and effector functions
IL-6 upregulation: sCD40L enhances IL-6 production, which can promote STAT3 activation and further immunosuppression
IL-12 inhibition: sCD40L inhibits IL-12 production from monocytes upon activation, potentially impairing Th1 responses and cell-mediated immunity
These changes in cytokine production collectively create an immunosuppressive environment that may benefit tumor growth and impair anti-tumor immune responses.
Given sCD40L's immunosuppressive effects in cancer, targeting this pathway represents a potential therapeutic strategy:
Neutralizing antibodies: Development of antibodies specifically targeting sCD40L while sparing membrane-bound CD40L could reduce immunosuppression without impairing normal CD40-CD40L interactions
Inhibition of platelet activation: Since platelets appear to be a major source of sCD40L in cancer patients, targeting platelet activation could indirectly reduce sCD40L levels
Combination strategies: Combining sCD40L inhibition with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may be particularly effective, as sCD40L induces PD-1 expression on T cells from cancer patients
Biomarker potential: sCD40L levels could serve as a biomarker to identify patients who might benefit from specific immunotherapeutic approaches
At least 15 clinical trials have aimed at modulating the CD40-CD40L pathway to enhance immunity in cancer patients, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this approach .
To effectively study sCD40L's immunomodulatory effects, researchers should consider these experimental approaches:
Primary human cell cultures: Using PBMCs from both cancer patients and healthy donors provides the most clinically relevant model system
Co-culture systems: T cells co-cultured with autologous MDSCs help evaluate the immunosuppressive effects of sCD40L
Flow cytometry analysis: Comprehensive immunophenotyping to assess changes in immune cell populations and activation markers
Cytokine profiling: Multiplex cytokine analysis to measure changes in cytokine production patterns
In vivo models: Humanized mouse models with human immune cell reconstitution may provide insights into the systemic effects of sCD40L
These models allow for detailed mechanistic studies of how sCD40L affects different immune cell populations and their functions.
The relationship between sCD40L levels and treatment response requires further investigation. Limited data suggests:
Stability through treatment: Some studies found no differences between pre- and post-treatment levels of serum sCD40L in prostate cancer patients participating in a clinical trial of a second-generation poxviral vaccine (PSA-TRICOM)
Potential resistance mechanism: Persistent elevation of sCD40L during treatment might contribute to immunotherapy resistance by maintaining an immunosuppressive environment
Monitoring potential: Serial measurements of sCD40L during treatment could potentially provide insights into changes in the tumor immune microenvironment
Further research is needed to determine whether changes in sCD40L levels correlate with clinical outcomes and whether targeting sCD40L could enhance the efficacy of existing cancer therapies.
Several critical questions remain unanswered regarding sCD40L in cancer:
Causality: Is elevated sCD40L a cause or consequence of cancer progression?
Mechanism specificity: Why does sCD40L have different effects on immune cells from cancer patients versus healthy donors?
Cancer type variations: Do sCD40L levels and effects vary across different cancer types?
Prognostic value: Can sCD40L levels predict clinical outcomes or treatment responses?
Therapeutic targeting: What is the optimal approach to targeting the sCD40L-CD40 axis in cancer?
Addressing these questions will advance our understanding of sCD40L's role in cancer and potentially lead to new therapeutic strategies.
Emerging single-cell technologies offer promising approaches to better understand sCD40L's effects:
Single-cell RNA sequencing: Analyzing transcriptional changes in individual immune cells following sCD40L exposure
CyTOF/mass cytometry: Detailed characterization of protein expression changes at the single-cell level
Spatial transcriptomics: Understanding how sCD40L affects immune cell interactions and spatial organization
Proteomics: Identifying downstream signaling pathways activated by sCD40L in different immune cell populations
CRISPR screens: Identifying genes that mediate sCD40L's immunosuppressive effects
These technologies could reveal cell type-specific responses to sCD40L and identify potential therapeutic targets within the pathway.
To enhance the reproducibility and clinical relevance of sCD40L research, standardization efforts should address:
Sample collection: Standardized protocols for blood collection and processing to minimize ex vivo platelet activation
Assay standardization: Development of reference standards and proficiency testing for sCD40L measurement
Reporting guidelines: Comprehensive reporting of experimental conditions and patient characteristics
Functional assays: Standardized protocols for assessing sCD40L's functional effects on immune cells
Data sharing: Centralized repositories for sCD40L data across different cancer types and treatment modalities
These standardization efforts would facilitate cross-study comparisons and accelerate the translation of research findings into clinical applications.
CD40 Ligand is a type II transmembrane protein predominantly expressed on activated CD4+ T lymphocytes. It can exist in two forms: membrane-bound and soluble. The soluble form is generated through proteolytic cleavage of the membrane-bound form, releasing a portion of the extracellular domain .
The recombinant form of soluble CD40 Ligand with a His tag (a sequence of histidine residues) is produced using various expression systems, such as HEK 293 cells or baculovirus-infected insect cells. The His tag facilitates purification and detection of the protein .
CD40 Ligand interacts with its receptor, CD40, which is expressed on B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and other antigen-presenting cells. This interaction is essential for several immune processes, including:
Defects in the CD40 Ligand gene (CD40LG) can lead to X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM1), an immunodeficiency disorder characterized by elevated levels of IgM and reduced levels of other immunoglobulins. Patients with HIGM1 are prone to recurrent bacterial and opportunistic infections .
Additionally, the interaction between CD40 and CD40 Ligand is implicated in various autoimmune diseases, inflammatory conditions, and cancer. As a result, soluble CD40 Ligand is a target for therapeutic interventions aimed at modulating immune responses .
Recombinant soluble CD40 Ligand with a His tag is widely used in research and clinical applications, including: