Cor a 1.0103 is classified as follows:
Biochemical Name: Pathogenesis-related protein PR-10 (Bet v 1 family member)
Source: Recombinant production in Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 insect cells via baculovirus expression systems
Isoallergen Group: Part of the Cor a 1.01 isoallergen group, which includes four variants (0101, 0102, 0103, 0104) with ~95% sequence identity
The solution structure of Cor a 1.0103 (inferred from homologs like Cor a 1.0401) reveals:
Cor a 1.01 isoforms (0101–0104) exhibit ~95% sequence identity
Cor a 1.04 isoforms (0401–0404) show 97–99% identity among themselves
Cross-reactivity with Bet v 1 is higher for Cor a 1.04 (>67% identity) than Cor a 1.01 (61–65%)
Cor a 1.0103 shares structural features with other PR-10 allergens but binds distinct ligands:
Natural Ligand: Quercetin-3-O-(2“-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside (identified in Cor a 1.0401)
Binding Mechanism: Slow exchange regime observed in NMR titrations, indicating strong binding (Kd < 5 µM)
Binding Interface: Affects residues in the hydrophobic pocket (e.g., F146, L92) and surface-exposed regions (Y152, R18, K21)
Cor a 1.0103 is provided in a buffer solution of 20mM HEPES at pH 7.9, containing 6M Urea.
Cor a 1.0103 is a recombinant allergen with a calculated molecular weight of 17 kDa and a calculated isoelectric point of pH 5.43 . It is expressed as a fusion protein construct containing full-length cDNA coding for Cor a 1.0103, where the allergen is released from the fusion partner by controlled proteolytic separation . Like other PR-10 proteins, it has a highly conserved C-terminus region that contains important epitopes for cross-reactivity with other Fagales allergens .
Cor a 1.0103 shares significant sequence homology with other Fagales allergens, particularly in the C-terminal region. The T-cell epitope region corresponding to Bet v 1 142-153 in Cor a 1.0103 shows 83% sequence identity, which explains the observed cross-reactivity . Additionally, the region in Cor a 1 that corresponds to Bet v 1 10-24 (PSVIPAARLFKSYV) is recognized by Cor a 1-specific T-cell lines, demonstrating particular immunological significance not observed with other homologous allergens .
For optimal preservation of Cor a 1.0103's biochemical and immunological properties, the recommended storage buffer should maintain a neutral to slightly alkaline pH and contain 20% glycerol as a cryoprotective agent . The allergen should be stored at -70°C or below, and repeated freeze/thaw cycles should be avoided to maintain structural integrity and immunological activity . Proper handling is essential for maintaining the allergen's ability to bind IgE antibodies in experimental assays.
Recombinant Cor a 1.0103 is effectively expressed using baculovirus expression systems. Specifically, it can be produced using recombinant baculovirus (Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus; AcMNPV) infection of Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 insect cells . This system provides proper protein folding and post-translational modifications necessary for maintaining the allergen's immunological function. Researchers should optimize infection parameters including MOI (multiplicity of infection), harvest time, and culture conditions to maximize yield while maintaining protein quality.
Purification of Cor a 1.0103 typically involves a multi-step process following expression in the baculovirus system. The purity of commercially available preparations is typically >80% as assessed by SDS-PAGE . For research applications requiring higher purity, additional chromatographic steps may be necessary. Quality control should include SDS-PAGE analysis, Western blotting with patient samples, and immunodot analyses with positive/negative control samples to verify both purity and immunological functionality .
T-cell epitope mapping for Cor a 1.0103 can be conducted using overlapping synthetic peptides spanning the entire sequence of the allergen. In published research, T-cell lines (TCL) specific to Cor a 1 have been generated by stimulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from allergic individuals with the recombinant allergen . These TCL can then be tested against peptide pools to identify immunodominant regions.
The methodology involves:
Isolation of PBMC from allergic individuals with confirmed IgE reactivity to Cor a 1.0103 (>0.35 kU/L)
In vitro stimulation with purified Cor a 1.0103 (typically 5-10 μg/ml)
Culture in the presence of IL-2 to expand allergen-specific T cells
Testing reactivity against synthetic peptides (15-20 amino acids with 5-10 amino acid overlaps)
Quantification of T-cell responses by measuring proliferation or cytokine production
Research has identified that Cor a 1-specific TCL recognize two main regions: the C-terminal epitope corresponding to Bet v 1 142-153 and an N-terminal region corresponding to Bet v 1 10-24 .
Allergen | Species | Identity with Bet v 1 142-153 | Cross-reactivity observed |
---|---|---|---|
Cor a 1.0103 | Hazel | 83% | Strong |
Car b 1 | Hornbeam | 92% | Strong |
Ost c 1 | European hop-hornbeam | 92% | Strong |
Fag s 1 | Beech | 58% | Moderate |
Aln g 1 | Alder | 83% | Variable* |
Cas s 1 | Chestnut | <58% | Limited |
Que a 1 | Oak | <58% | Limited |
*Despite high sequence identity, Aln g 1-specific T-cell lines often recognize different epitopes than expected, suggesting that subtle amino acid differences (e.g., G142 and K145) may be critical for T-cell recognition .
These differences in cross-reactivity patterns highlight the importance of considering both sequence homology and structural factors in predicting allergenic cross-reactivity.
For quantitative measurement of Cor a 1.0103-specific IgE, ELISA-based methods have been validated in research settings. The methodology involves:
Coating microtiter plates (e.g., Nunc MaxiSorp) with recombinant Cor a 1.0103 at 1 μg/ml overnight
Blocking non-specific binding sites with appropriate buffer
Incubating patient serum samples in duplicates overnight at 4°C
Detecting bound IgE with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated mouse anti-human IgE
Measuring optical density after addition of appropriate substrate
Quantifying allergen-specific IgE levels using a standard curve generated with samples of known IgE concentration
For clinical applications, commercial ImmunoCAP assays may also be used, though these may detect multiple Cor a 1 isoforms rather than specifically Cor a 1.0103.
When designing experiments to investigate T-cell cross-reactivity between Cor a 1.0103 and other Fagales allergens, researchers should consider a systematic approach:
Subject selection:
Include individuals with confirmed clinical allergy to hazel pollen
Verify IgE sensitization to Cor a 1.0103 (>0.35 kU/L by ImmunoCAP or equivalent)
Consider including subjects with mono-sensitization and poly-sensitization patterns
Generation of allergen-specific T-cell lines:
Isolate PBMC and stimulate with either Cor a 1.0103 or other Fagales allergens
Expand T cells with IL-2 over 2-3 weeks
Verify specificity by re-stimulation with the initiating allergen
Cross-reactivity testing:
Test each T-cell line against a panel of recombinant Fagales allergens
Include synthetic peptides covering known epitope regions
Measure proliferation by 3H-thymidine incorporation or CFSE dilution
Assess cytokine production profiles (Th1/Th2/Th17)
Controls:
This experimental design allows for the systematic investigation of cross-reactivity patterns and can help identify the molecular basis for cross-sensitization.
When using Cor a 1.0103 in functional assays, several factors should be carefully controlled:
Protein quality:
Buffer composition:
Use neutral to slightly alkaline pH
Include glycerol as a stabilizing agent for storage
Ensure buffer components don't interfere with the specific assay
Experimental controls:
Patient selection:
Clearly define inclusion criteria (clinical symptoms, IgE levels)
Consider potential confounding factors (polysensitization, cross-reactivity)
Document detailed clinical phenotypes
Assay validation:
Establish dose-response relationships
Verify reproducibility across technical and biological replicates
Include internal standards for normalization between experiments
Proper attention to these factors will ensure robust and reproducible results in functional assays using Cor a 1.0103.
Investigating discrepancies between sequence homology and observed cross-reactivity requires a multi-faceted approach:
Epitope mapping with amino acid substitutions:
Generate peptides with single amino acid substitutions in key epitope regions
Test their ability to stimulate T-cell responses
Identify critical residues that might not be apparent from sequence comparisons alone
Structural biology approaches:
Determine or model the 3D structure of Cor a 1.0103
Compare with structures of other Fagales allergens
Analyze surface-exposed regions that may contribute to antibody binding
Antigen processing studies:
Investigate how different allergens are processed by antigen-presenting cells
Identify the peptide fragments generated after processing
Analyze how processing might influence epitope presentation
Detecting T-cell responses to low-abundance epitopes presents significant challenges. Advanced methodological approaches include:
Enrichment of allergen-specific T cells:
Use allergen tetramers to identify and sort specific T cells
Employ cytokine capture assays to enrich responsive cells
Implement multiple rounds of stimulation to expand rare specific clones
High-sensitivity detection methods:
ELISPOT assays for single-cell cytokine detection
Single-cell RNA sequencing to identify activation signatures
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for multiparameter analysis of rare cell populations
Novel peptide presentation strategies:
Use of artificial antigen-presenting cells loaded with specific peptides
Peptide libraries with altered flanking regions to enhance processing
Liposomal delivery systems to improve peptide uptake and presentation
Controlling for experimental variables:
Standardize timing between blood collection and processing
Validate HLA typing of subjects to correlate with epitope recognition
Implement strict quality control for all reagents and cell preparations
These approaches can significantly enhance the detection of T-cell responses to minor epitopes in Cor a 1.0103, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the immunological recognition patterns.
Variability in IgE binding assays can significantly impact research results. Key strategies to minimize variability include:
Protein quality control:
Use consistent lots of recombinant Cor a 1.0103
Verify protein concentration using multiple methods (e.g., Bradford assay, BCA)
Confirm functionality before each set of experiments
Standardized protocols:
Establish detailed SOPs for coating concentration and conditions
Standardize blocking reagents and incubation times
Use calibrated pipettes and validated plate washers
Reference standards:
Include a standard curve on each plate
Use pooled reference sera with known reactivity
Normalize results across experiments using these standards
Technical considerations:
Perform all assays in at least duplicate, preferably triplicate
Control environmental conditions (temperature, humidity)
Consider edge effects on microtiter plates
Data analysis approaches:
Use appropriate statistical methods for analyzing variable data
Consider log transformation of IgE values
Implement outlier detection and handling policies
By addressing these factors systematically, researchers can significantly reduce variability in IgE binding assays and generate more reliable and reproducible data.
Inhibition experiments are valuable tools for studying cross-reactivity between Cor a 1.0103 and other allergens. Key considerations include:
Experimental design:
Inhibitor selection and preparation:
Use purified recombinant allergens of verified quality
Standardize inhibitor concentrations based on molecular weight
Ensure inhibitors are in the same buffer to prevent buffer-related effects
Critical controls:
No-inhibitor controls to establish baseline binding
Complete inhibition controls (excess inhibitor)
Non-specific inhibition controls (irrelevant proteins)
Data analysis:
Calculate percent inhibition relative to no-inhibitor control
Determine IC50 values for each inhibitor
Create inhibition curves to visualize cross-reactivity patterns
Result interpretation:
Consider both the maximum inhibition and the inhibition potency
Relate results to sequence and structural similarities
Integrate findings with epitope mapping data
Proper design and execution of inhibition experiments provide valuable insights into the structural basis of cross-reactivity and can help identify clinically relevant cross-reactive allergens.
Emerging technologies offer new opportunities to advance our understanding of T-cell responses to Cor a 1.0103:
Single-cell technologies:
Single-cell RNA sequencing to identify heterogeneity in responding T cells
Single-cell TCR sequencing to characterize the repertoire of Cor a 1.0103-specific T cells
Paired analysis of TCR sequences and cytokine profiles
HLA-associated peptide analysis:
Direct identification of Cor a 1.0103-derived peptides presented by HLA molecules
Mass spectrometry-based immunopeptidomics
Correlation of presented peptides with predicted and experimental T-cell epitopes
Advanced structural studies:
Cryo-EM structures of TCR-peptide-MHC complexes
Molecular dynamics simulations of peptide binding to HLA molecules
Analysis of how minor sequence variations affect 3D structure
Systems immunology approaches:
Integration of transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional data
Network analysis of allergen-specific immune responses
Identification of key regulatory nodes in allergic responses
These approaches could provide unprecedented insights into the molecular basis of T-cell recognition of Cor a 1.0103 and its relationship to clinical allergic responses.
Research on Cor a 1.0103 has important implications for developing more effective allergen-specific immunotherapy:
Epitope-based approaches:
Design of peptide immunotherapy targeting dominant T-cell epitopes
Development of hypoallergenic variants with modified B-cell epitopes but preserved T-cell epitopes
Creation of epitope-focused vaccines that induce regulatory T-cell responses
Cross-reactivity considerations:
Identification of shared epitopes across multiple Fagales allergens
Design of immunotherapy strategies targeting common epitopes
Understanding which epitopes are most important for clinical cross-reactivity
Personalized approaches:
HLA typing to predict individual epitope recognition patterns
Tailored immunotherapy based on individual sensitization profiles
Monitoring of epitope-specific responses during immunotherapy
Novel delivery platforms:
Nanoparticle-based delivery of Cor a 1.0103 epitopes
mRNA-based approaches for controlled allergen expression
Adjuvant systems specifically designed to promote tolerance
By integrating molecular understanding of Cor a 1.0103 with advanced immunotherapy approaches, researchers can work toward more effective, targeted treatments for allergies to hazel and related Fagales pollens.
Cor a 1 is a protein that triggers allergic reactions in susceptible individuals. It is part of a family of proteins that includes other major tree pollen allergens such as Bet v 1 from birch and Aln g 1 from alder. These proteins share a high degree of similarity in their amino acid sequences, leading to cross-reactivity among different tree pollens .
Recombinant Cor a 1 is produced using genetic engineering techniques. The gene encoding Cor a 1 is cloned and expressed in a suitable host, such as Escherichia coli or insect cells. This allows for the production of large quantities of the allergen in a controlled environment, which is essential for research and clinical applications .
Studies have identified multiple isoforms of Cor a 1, each with slight variations in their amino acid sequences. These isoforms can exhibit different immunological properties, such as varying degrees of IgE binding and T-cell reactivity. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing effective diagnostic tools and immunotherapies .
Recombinant Cor a 1 has been shown to retain the immunological properties of the natural allergen. It can bind to IgE antibodies from allergic patients and stimulate T-cells, making it a valuable tool for studying the immune response to hazel pollen. The recombinant form also allows for the identification of specific epitopes, which are the parts of the allergen recognized by the immune system .
The availability of recombinant Cor a 1 has significant implications for allergy diagnosis and treatment. It can be used to develop more accurate diagnostic tests, such as skin prick tests and specific IgE assays. Additionally, recombinant allergens are being explored for use in allergen-specific immunotherapy, which aims to desensitize patients to the allergen and reduce allergic symptoms .