ENTPD6 hydrolyzes extracellular nucleoside diphosphates (e.g., GDP, IDP) to monophosphates, regulating purinergic signaling pathways . Unlike CD39, it shows minimal activity toward ATP/ADP .
Cancer Resistance: Downregulation of ENTPD6 correlates with cisplatin resistance in testicular cancer. Overexpression sensitizes cells to cisplatin by stabilizing E-cadherin, a protein linked to chemoresistance .
Tissue Distribution: Highest mRNA levels in cardiac muscle and capillary endothelial cells .
Recombinant ENTPD6 (e.g., R&D Systems #4399-EN, Prospec PRO-2629) is used to study nucleotide-driven processes. A standardized activity assay involves:
Tissue | Expression Level |
---|---|
Cardiac Muscle | High |
Liver | Moderate |
Lung | Low |
ENTPD6 interacts with:
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 6 isoform 1, CD39L2, dJ738P15.3, IL-6SAG, IL6ST2, NTPDase-6.
MGSSHHHHHH SSGLVPRGSH MGSKWHRATA TQAFFSITRA APGARWGQQA HSPLGTAADG HEVFYGIMFD AGSTGTRVHV FQFTRPPRET PTLTHETFKA LKPGLSAYAD DVEKSAQGIR ELLDVAKQDI PFDFWKATPL VLKATAGLRL LPGEKAQKLL QKVKEVFKAS PFLVGDDCVS IMNGTDEGVS AWITINFLTG SLKTPGGSSV GMLDLGGGST QIAFLPRVEG TLQASPPGYL TALRMFNRTY KLYSYSYLGL GLMSARLAIL GGVEGQPAKD GKELVSPCLS PSFKGEWEHA EVTYRVSGQK AAASLHELCA ARVSEVLQNR VHRTEEVKHV DFYAFSYYYD LAAGVGLIDA EKGGSLVVGD FEIAAKYVCR TLETQPQSSP FSCMDLTYVS LLLQEFGFPR SKVLKLTRKI DNVETSWALG AIFHYIDSLN RQKSPAS
ENTPD6, or Ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 6, is an enzyme encoded by the ENTPD6 gene in humans . It belongs to the GDA1/CD39 NTPase family and functions similarly to E-type nucleotidases (NTPases) . ENTPD6 primarily supports glycosylation reactions in the Golgi apparatus, a critical function for proper protein processing . When released from cells, it also catalyzes the hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides, preferentially hydrolyzing nucleoside 5'-diphosphates while having minimal activity against nucleoside 5'-triphosphates and no activity against nucleoside 5'-monophosphates .
The enzyme contains four apyrase-conserved regions, which are characteristic structural elements of NTPases . These regions are essential for its catalytic function. Unlike some other members of this family that predominantly act on extracellular nucleotides, ENTPD6 has a more specialized role within the cellular secretory pathway, particularly in the Golgi apparatus.
ENTPD6 demonstrates a clear hierarchy in its substrate preferences. The enzyme hydrolyzes nucleoside 5'-diphosphates with high efficiency but shows limited activity toward nucleoside 5'-triphosphates and no hydrolytic activity against nucleoside 5'-monophosphates . The specific order of substrate preference is:
Substrate | Relative Preference |
---|---|
GDP | Highest |
IDP | High |
UDP | Moderate |
CDP | Moderate |
ADP | Low |
This substrate specificity profile distinguishes ENTPD6 from other ectonucleotidases and suggests specialized functions in cellular processes requiring selective nucleotide hydrolysis, particularly those involving guanosine diphosphates .
ENTPD6 exhibits a complex subcellular distribution pattern. The enzyme is predominantly associated with:
Golgi membrane - where it plays a role in glycosylation reactions
Plasma membrane - as an integral membrane protein
Cell surface - where it can interact with extracellular substrates
This multi-compartment localization reflects ENTPD6's diverse functions in both intracellular processes and extracellular signaling. Its presence in the Golgi apparatus aligns with its role in glycosylation reactions, while its detection at the cell surface and in extracellular spaces supports its involvement in extracellular nucleotide metabolism.
The human ENTPD6 gene is located on chromosome 20, specifically in the p11.21 region . This genomic positioning is significant for researchers studying chromosome 20-associated disorders or conducting linkage analyses. The gene encodes multiple transcript variants through alternative splicing, resulting in at least two confirmed protein isoforms .
The ENTPD6 gene is identified in various genetic databases with the following identifiers:
Two confirmed isoforms of human ENTPD6 protein are produced through alternative splicing . While the full sequence differences between these isoforms are not detailed in the provided search results, alternative splicing typically results in proteins with different domain compositions or subcellular targeting signals. These structural variations may contribute to functional specialization, potentially directing the isoforms to different cellular compartments or modifying their enzymatic properties.
The molecular weight of ENTPD6 is approximately 53,246 Da, though this may vary slightly between isoforms . Researchers studying specific isoforms should verify their molecular characteristics through protein analysis techniques such as western blotting.
ENTPD6 differs from other NTPDase family members, such as CD39, in several key aspects:
Substrate preference: ENTPD6 strongly prefers nucleoside 5'-diphosphates, particularly GDP, while other NTPDases may have broader substrate ranges or prefer triphosphates .
Cellular localization: While many NTPDases primarily function at the cell surface, ENTPD6 has a significant presence in the Golgi apparatus, suggesting a specialized role in intracellular processes .
Functional roles: ENTPD6's involvement in Golgi glycosylation reactions represents a distinct function not shared by all NTPDase family members, which often focus on extracellular nucleotide catabolism .
This specialized profile suggests that ENTPD6 has evolved to fulfill specific cellular requirements distinct from the broader extracellular nucleotide regulatory functions of other family members.
ENTPD6 contains four apyrase-conserved regions (ACRs), which are signature structural elements of the NTPase family . These highly conserved domains are essential for the catalytic function of ENTPD6 and other related enzymes. The ACRs typically contain amino acid residues that coordinate with divalent cations (usually Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺) and participate in substrate binding and hydrolysis.
The arrangement and specific composition of these ACRs likely contribute to ENTPD6's distinctive substrate preference for nucleoside diphosphates, particularly GDP. Mutations in these conserved regions would be expected to significantly impact enzymatic activity and could be useful targets for structure-function studies.
ENTPD6 plays a supporting role in glycosylation reactions within the Golgi apparatus . While the precise mechanisms are not fully detailed in the search results, its nucleotide diphosphatase activity likely contributes to regulating nucleotide sugar concentrations or ratios within the Golgi lumen. This regulation is crucial because:
Glycosylation requires activated sugar donors (nucleotide sugars) such as UDP-glucose or GDP-mannose
The reaction produces nucleoside diphosphates as byproducts
Accumulation of these byproducts can inhibit glycosyltransferase activity
ENTPD6 likely hydrolyzes these inhibitory byproducts, maintaining optimal conditions for glycosylation
This function is particularly important for proper protein processing and maturation through the secretory pathway, affecting numerous cellular processes including protein folding, stability, and targeting.
When released from cells, ENTPD6 contributes to extracellular nucleotide metabolism by catalyzing the hydrolysis of specific nucleotides . This activity potentially impacts several physiological processes:
Purinergic signaling - by modulating the availability of signaling molecules like ADP
Nucleotide recycling - by initiating the breakdown of extracellular nucleotides
Inflammatory responses - by affecting nucleotide-mediated immune signaling
The marked preference of ENTPD6 for GDP over other nucleoside diphosphates suggests specific structural features that enhance guanosine recognition. While the search results don't provide explicit structural details, likely determinants include:
Specific amino acid residues in the substrate binding pocket that favor guanosine base interactions
Configuration of the apyrase-conserved regions that may preferentially accommodate GDP
Potential allosteric sites that respond differently to various nucleotides
Advanced structural biology techniques such as X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM would be necessary to fully characterize these determinants. Computational approaches like molecular docking could also provide insights into the structural basis of substrate selectivity.
For optimal measurement of ENTPD6 enzymatic activity in vitro, researchers should consider the following parameters:
Substrate selection: Given ENTPD6's preference hierarchy (GDP > IDP >> UDP = CDP >> ADP), GDP should be used as the primary substrate for maximal activity . Including additional substrates can help characterize the enzyme's specificity.
Buffer conditions: A physiologically relevant buffer (pH 7.2-7.4) containing divalent cations (Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺) is essential as these are typically required for NTPase activity.
Temperature: Activity assays should be conducted at 37°C to reflect physiological conditions.
Detection method: Several approaches can be used:
Malachite green assay to detect released phosphate
HPLC analysis of substrate consumption and product formation
Coupled enzyme assays that link nucleotide hydrolysis to a colorimetric or fluorescent readout
Controls: Include controls for non-enzymatic hydrolysis and verify the specificity with inhibitors or heat-inactivated enzyme.
When interpreting results, remember that recombinant ENTPD6 may show different kinetic parameters than the native enzyme due to potential differences in post-translational modifications or conformation.
Several complementary approaches can be used to manipulate ENTPD6 expression in cell culture models:
For overexpression:
Plasmid-based expression: Transfect cells with expression vectors containing the ENTPD6 cDNA under a strong promoter (CMV, EF1α)
Viral vectors: Use lentiviral or adenoviral systems for higher efficiency or stable integration
Inducible systems: Employ tetracycline-responsive or similar systems for controlled expression
For knockdown/knockout:
siRNA/shRNA: Target specific sequences in ENTPD6 mRNA for temporary knockdown
CRISPR-Cas9: Design guide RNAs targeting exonic regions, ideally within apyrase-conserved regions, for permanent knockout
Antisense oligonucleotides: Use modified oligonucleotides to target ENTPD6 mRNA
Validation methods:
Western blotting: Confirm protein level changes
qRT-PCR: Verify mRNA expression alterations
Enzymatic activity assays: Measure functional consequences
Immunofluorescence: Assess changes in localization patterns
Cell line selection should consider endogenous ENTPD6 expression levels and cellular compartmentalization to ensure relevant physiological context for your experiments.
Given ENTPD6's diverse localization pattern across Golgi membranes, plasma membrane, and extracellular space , several complementary approaches are recommended for accurate subcellular localization:
Imaging approaches:
Immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies specific to ENTPD6
Co-localization studies with established markers:
Golgi markers: GM130, TGN46
Plasma membrane markers: Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase, WGA
Fluorescent protein tagging (careful placement of tags to avoid disrupting localization signals)
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization within compartments
Biochemical approaches:
Subcellular fractionation followed by western blotting
Surface biotinylation to distinguish plasma membrane vs. intracellular pools
Protease protection assays to determine topology
Density gradient separation of organelles
Controls and validation:
Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Knockdown/knockout controls to verify signal specificity
Comparison of endogenous vs. exogenous protein localization patterns
A combination of these approaches provides the most reliable picture of ENTPD6's dynamic subcellular distribution.
To investigate ENTPD6 protein-protein interactions, consider these methodological approaches:
In vitro techniques:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Pull down ENTPD6 and probe for interacting partners
Pull-down assays with tagged recombinant ENTPD6
Crosslinking mass spectrometry to identify proximal proteins
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for quantitative binding analysis of candidate interactors
Cell-based approaches:
Proximity labeling methods:
BioID: Fusion of ENTPD6 with a biotin ligase
APEX2: Fusion with an engineered peroxidase
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)
Mammalian two-hybrid systems
Confirmatory methods:
Reciprocal Co-IP experiments
Colocalization by super-resolution microscopy
Functional assays measuring effects of disrupting interactions
Competition assays with peptides or small molecules
Given ENTPD6's membrane association, detergent selection is critical for maintaining native interactions while allowing solubilization. Mild detergents like digitonin or CHAPS are often preferred for membrane protein interaction studies.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of ENTPD6 can significantly impact its localization, activity, and interactions. To characterize these modifications:
Identification methods:
Mass spectrometry-based approaches:
Shotgun proteomics for global PTM identification
Targeted methods for specific modifications
Enrichment strategies (e.g., phosphopeptide enrichment)
Western blotting with modification-specific antibodies
Mobility shift assays for detecting phosphorylation
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Mutation of predicted modification sites to non-modifiable residues
Creation of phosphomimetic mutations (e.g., S/T to E)
Assessment of functional consequences using activity assays
Enzymatic treatments:
Phosphatase treatment to remove phosphate groups
Glycosidase digestion to remove glycans
Deubiquitinase treatment to remove ubiquitin
Dynamic regulation:
Pulse-chase experiments to track modification kinetics
Treatment with kinase or phosphatase inhibitors
Stimulation with relevant signaling molecules
For ENTPD6, particular attention should be given to glycosylation states, given its Golgi localization and potential roles in glycosylation pathways.
The choice of statistical methods for ENTPD6 activity data should be guided by your experimental design and data characteristics:
For enzyme kinetics:
Non-linear regression for fitting Michaelis-Menten or other kinetic models
Statistical comparison of fitted parameters (Km, Vmax) using extra sum-of-squares F test
Global fitting of multiple datasets to compare models
For comparative studies:
Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test for two-group comparisons
ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests for multiple group comparisons:
One-way ANOVA for single-factor experiments
Two-way ANOVA for experiments with two variables (e.g., substrate and inhibitor)
Repeated measures approaches for time-course experiments
For correlation analyses:
Pearson or Spearman correlation for relating ENTPD6 activity to other variables
Multiple regression for complex relationships
Partial correlation to control for confounding variables
Reporting recommendations:
Power analysis prior to experimentation helps ensure sufficient sample sizes for detecting biologically meaningful differences in ENTPD6 activity.
For robust comparison of ENTPD6 expression across tissues or experimental conditions:
mRNA-based methods:
qRT-PCR with carefully validated reference genes
Use multiple reference genes selected for stability across your conditions
Apply geometric averaging for normalization
RNA-seq with appropriate normalization:
TPM (Transcripts Per Million) or FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)
Consider batch effect correction methods
Northern blotting for detecting specific transcript variants
Protein-based methods:
Western blotting with:
Loading controls appropriate for your sample types
Standard curves of recombinant protein for quantification
Densitometry analysis with linear range validation
ELISA for quantitative measurement
Immunohistochemistry with validated antibodies for tissue localization
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics with:
Label-free quantification
Stable isotope labeling approaches (SILAC, TMT)
Data analysis considerations:
Log-transformation of expression data if not normally distributed
Visualization through heatmaps for multi-tissue comparisons
Principal component analysis to identify patterns
Correlation with known markers of relevant cellular compartments
For cross-study comparisons, focus on relative changes rather than absolute values unless standardized methods were used throughout.
Several bioinformatic tools can provide valuable insights into ENTPD6 structure and function:
Structural prediction:
AlphaFold or RoseTTAFold for protein structure prediction
SwissModel for homology modeling based on related structures
I-TASSER for integrative structural modeling
PSIPRED for secondary structure prediction
TMHMM or TOPCONS for transmembrane topology prediction
Functional analysis:
InterProScan for domain and motif identification
ConSurf for evolutionary conservation analysis
ScanProsite for identifying functional sites
NetPhos for phosphorylation site prediction
NetNGlyc and NetOGlyc for glycosylation site prediction
Comparative genomics:
Clustal Omega or MUSCLE for multiple sequence alignment
MEGA for phylogenetic analysis
Jalview for alignment visualization and analysis
PAML for detecting signatures of selection
Systems biology approaches:
STRING for protein-protein interaction network analysis
Reactome for pathway analysis
GeneMANIA for functional association networks
NetworKIN for kinase-substrate relationship prediction
Integration of these approaches can provide a comprehensive picture of ENTPD6's structural features, functional domains, evolutionary relationships, and potential regulatory mechanisms.
To establish meaningful connections between ENTPD6 activity and physiological outcomes:
Experimental design strategies:
Dose-response relationships:
Titrate ENTPD6 expression or activity using inducible systems
Correlate enzymatic activity levels with phenotypic readouts
Temporal dynamics:
Track both ENTPD6 activity and physiological parameters over time
Establish whether ENTPD6 changes precede, coincide with, or follow physiological changes
Specificity controls:
Rescue experiments with wild-type vs. catalytically inactive ENTPD6
Use of specific inhibitors at multiple concentrations
Analysis approaches:
Correlation analysis (Pearson, Spearman) between ENTPD6 activity and physiological metrics
Regression models to quantify relationships while controlling for covariates
Mediation analysis to test whether ENTPD6 effects are direct or via intermediate factors
Principal component analysis to identify patterns in complex datasets
Causality assessment:
Genetic manipulation (knockout, knockdown, overexpression)
Pharmaceutical intervention (when specific inhibitors are available)
Rescue experiments with wild-type or mutant variants
Substrate depletion or supplementation studies
Consideration of alternative explanations:
Test multiple competing hypotheses
Examine potential confounding factors
Control for indirect effects through careful experimental design
Validate findings in multiple model systems or conditions
By systematically examining these relationships, researchers can establish whether changes in ENTPD6 activity are causal, consequential, or merely correlated with observed physiological outcomes.
The ENTPD6 gene is located on chromosome 20 and encodes a protein that is part of the NTPDase family. This family is characterized by the presence of four apyrase-conserved regions (ACRs), which are essential for the enzyme’s catalytic activity . The protein is a membrane-bound enzyme that can also be released from cells to function extracellularly .
ENTPD6 catalyzes the hydrolysis of nucleoside triphosphates and diphosphates in a calcium- or magnesium-dependent manner. It has a strong preference for nucleoside diphosphates, such as GDP, IDP, and UDP, and shows slower hydrolysis rates for CDP, ITP, GTP, CTP, ADP, and UTP. Interestingly, it exhibits virtually no hydrolysis of ATP . The enzyme’s activity is crucial for regulating the levels of extracellular nucleotides, thereby modulating purinergic signaling pathways .
The recombinant form of ENTPD6 is produced using genetic engineering techniques. The gene encoding ENTPD6 is cloned into an expression vector, which is then introduced into a suitable host cell, such as Escherichia coli or mammalian cells. The host cells are cultured under conditions that promote the expression of the recombinant protein. After expression, the protein is purified using various chromatographic techniques to obtain a highly pure and active enzyme .
Recombinant ENTPD6 has several applications in research and medicine. It is used to study the mechanisms of purinergic signaling and its role in various physiological and pathological processes. Additionally, it serves as a tool for screening potential therapeutic agents that target purinergic signaling pathways. The enzyme’s ability to hydrolyze extracellular nucleotides makes it a potential candidate for therapeutic interventions in conditions characterized by dysregulated purinergic signaling, such as chronic inflammation and cancer .
ENTPD6 has been implicated in several diseases, including Gaucher Disease Type IIIC and Endometrial Transitional Cell Carcinoma . Its role in these diseases is linked to its function in regulating extracellular nucleotide levels and purinergic signaling. Understanding the enzyme’s activity and regulation can provide insights into the pathophysiology of these conditions and aid in the development of targeted therapies .