The PRLR gene (ENSOCUG00000005274) on chromosome 11 spans 56,363,806–56,565,013 bp and contains 17 exons . Polymorphisms in this gene correlate with reproductive and milk production traits:
These SNPs influence prolactin signaling pathways, which regulate lactation, embryo implantation, and growth .
PRL R Rabbit is used to investigate prolactin-receptor interactions. Affinity cross-linking experiments with [¹²⁵I]ovine prolactin identified a 32 kDa binding subunit in rabbit mammary glands, confirmed via SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions .
Inhibition Assays: PRL R Rabbit suppresses prolactin-induced Nb2 cell proliferation, validating its antagonistic properties .
Structural Analysis: The extracellular domain’s non-glycosylated form allows crystallographic studies to map hormone-binding regions .
PRL receptors are expressed in multiple rabbit tissues, with distinct molecular weights:
This tissue-specific variation suggests divergent receptor isoforms or post-translational modifications .
Studies on wild and domestic rabbits reveal that PRLR polymorphisms impact:
Prolactin plays a crucial role in rabbit reproductive physiology, influencing multiple aspects of breeding efficiency. Research has demonstrated that pre-mating prolactin levels significantly correlate with reproductive performance in doe rabbits. Methodologically, researchers should measure plasma PRL concentration within 24 hours of parturition when evaluating its impact on subsequent reproductive cycles. Studies have shown that optimal pre-mating PRL levels range between 30-45 ng/ml for maximizing reproductive performance, with does in higher PRL categories (>35-45 ng/ml) demonstrating superior reproductive traits compared to those with lower concentrations .
Pre-mating PRL levels demonstrate a strong positive association with pregnancy rate and litter characteristics. When designing studies to investigate this relationship, researchers should stratify doe rabbits into distinct PRL categories (e.g., >20-25, >25-30, >30-35, >35-40, and >40-45 ng/ml) following standardized blood collection protocols. Analysis reveals that does with higher pre-mating PRL profiles (particularly in the 35-45 ng/ml range) require fewer services per conception, exhibit higher pregnancy rates after first mating, and produce larger litters with improved kit viability . This methodology allows for precise evaluation of PRL's reproductive impact beyond simple correlational analyses.
Research indicates a significant positive correlation between live body weight (LBW) of doe rabbits and pre-mating PRL levels. To investigate this relationship, researchers should track weight changes from mating through gestation and kindling while simultaneously monitoring hormonal profiles. The data reveals correlation coefficients between pre-mating PRL and LBW ranging from r=0.639 to r=0.820 (p<0.05) across reproductive stages, with the strongest correlations observed during mid-gestation (days 14-28) . For comprehensive analysis, researchers should consider both direct PRL effects and potential body weight mediating effects when designing studies on reproductive performance.
For reliable PRL quantification in rabbit studies, blood sampling should be conducted at consistent times to control for circadian variations. Methodologically, samples should be collected in heparinized tubes, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes, with plasma stored at -20°C until analysis. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques using rabbit-specific antibodies are recommended for accurate PRL determination. Researchers should establish standardized protocols for sample collection, handling, and analysis to ensure data comparability across studies, with consideration for potential stress-induced variations during handling .
The relationship between pre-mating PRL and subsequent progesterone (P4) levels during pregnancy represents a complex endocrine interaction. Methodologically, researchers should measure P4 concentrations at multiple gestation timepoints (particularly mid-pregnancy) across different PRL category groups. Data indicates that higher pre-mating PRL levels correlate with elevated P4 during pregnancy, suggesting a potential priming effect of PRL on corpus luteum function. Advanced analysis should incorporate multivariate models to control for confounding variables, as the PRL-P4 relationship may be modulated by additional factors including body condition and environmental variables .
Genetic analysis of prolactin regulation in rabbits requires sophisticated molecular approaches. Rather than relying solely on phenotypic measurements, researchers should employ candidate gene approaches targeting the prolactin receptor gene (PRLR) and related signaling pathway components. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) programs can accelerate genetic improvement for reproductive traits with low heritability. Research suggests that several genes influence uterine capacity, embryo implantation, and fetal survival in rabbits . For comprehensive genetic analysis, researchers should combine genomic data with detailed reproductive phenotyping, potentially including SNP genotyping of the progesterone receptor gene (PGR), which has shown associations with litter size variation .
Distinguishing between direct hormonal effects and indirect physiological consequences of PRL on reproduction requires sophisticated experimental designs. Researchers should implement multivariate statistical approaches, path analysis, or structural equation modeling to evaluate potential causal pathways. Experimental designs might include selective PRL receptor antagonist administration or receptor knockdown models to isolate specific PRL-mediated effects. Analysis should account for the complex interrelationships between PRL, body weight, and progesterone dynamics. The strongest correlations between pre-mating PRL and reproductive outcomes appear during specific reproductive phases, suggesting temporally-dependent effects that require precise timing of interventions and measurements .
Research on PRL function occasionally produces contradictory results across different rabbit breeds or under varying experimental conditions. To address these inconsistencies, researchers should implement standardized protocols across multi-breed studies, with consistent environmental conditions and detailed genetic characterization. Statistical analyses should include breed as a random effect in mixed models to account for genetic background influence. Comprehensive studies should simultaneously measure multiple reproductive hormones (including estradiol-17β, PRL, and progesterone) to capture complex endocrine interactions. Time-series hormone profiling rather than single timepoint measurements provides greater insight into dynamic hormonal relationships .
Analyzing the complex relationships between PRL and reproductive outcomes requires sophisticated statistical methodologies. Researchers should employ mixed-model approaches when working with repeated measurements across reproductive cycles. For categorical reproductive outcomes (e.g., pregnancy rates), logistic regression models with PRL categories as predictors are appropriate. Correlation analysis should utilize Pearson coefficients for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical outcomes. When analyzing distribution patterns of PRL levels across populations, researchers should evaluate normality and consider potential bimodal distributions that might indicate distinct physiological subgroups .
PRL secretion in rabbits demonstrates seasonal variation that can confound reproductive studies. Researchers should implement blocked experimental designs that control for seasonal effects or conduct studies within consistent seasonal windows. Alternatively, environmental parameters (temperature, photoperiod) should be controlled and standardized when conducting year-round studies. Statistical analyses should include season as a covariate when appropriate. Research in other species indicates that PRL levels increase during transition from anovulatory to breeding seasons, suggesting similar patterns may exist in rabbits and should be considered in experimental design .
PRL Category (ng/ml) | Population Distribution (%) | Average Live Body Weight (kg) | Services per Conception | Pregnancy Rate (%) | Live Litter Size at Birth | Kit Survival Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>20-25 (Category A) | 12.8 | 2.86 ± 0.07 | 1.80 ± 0.20 | 60.0 | 5.60 ± 0.40 | 86.3 |
>25-30 (Category B) | 15.4 | 2.98 ± 0.08 | 1.50 ± 0.17 | 66.7 | 6.25 ± 0.31 | 88.5 |
>30-35 (Category C) | 38.5 | 3.18 ± 0.06 | 1.30 ± 0.15 | 76.7 | 7.13 ± 0.21 | 90.2 |
>35-40 (Category D) | 20.5 | 3.32 ± 0.07 | 1.13 ± 0.13 | 87.5 | 7.75 ± 0.16 | 93.1 |
>40-45 (Category E) | 12.8 | 3.41 ± 0.09 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 100.0 | 8.20 ± 0.20 | 95.5 |
This data clearly demonstrates that does with pre-mating PRL levels in categories D and E (>35-45 ng/ml) exhibit superior reproductive performance across multiple parameters. Researchers should consider these optimal ranges when designing studies or implementing breeding program improvements .
Reproductive Stage | Correlation Coefficient with Pre-mating PRL | Significance Level |
---|---|---|
Body Weight at Mating | r = 0.778 | p < 0.001 |
Body Weight Day 14 of Gestation | r = 0.820 | p < 0.001 |
Body Weight Day 28 of Gestation | r = 0.818 | p < 0.001 |
Body Weight at Kindling | r = 0.639 | p < 0.001 |
Total Litter Size | r = 0.859 | p < 0.001 |
Live Kits at Birth | r = 0.754 | p < 0.001 |
Kits at Weaning | r = 0.813 | p < 0.001 |
This correlation analysis provides critical insights for researchers investigating the temporal relationships between PRL and various reproductive parameters. The strongest correlations are observed during mid-gestation and with total litter size, suggesting these as key timepoints and outcomes for experimental focus .
Future research should focus on identifying specific genetic markers associated with optimal PRL profiles. Rather than traditional selection programs with slow genetic gains (approximately 0.1 kits per generation), researchers should implement marker-assisted selection incorporating PRL-related genetic markers . This approach requires combining genomic data with comprehensive phenotypic records of reproductive performance across multiple generations. Promising research directions include investigation of genes affecting uterine capacity and genetic variants in PRL signaling pathways. Studies have already identified SNPs in the progesterone receptor gene (PGR) that influence litter size components, suggesting similar approaches may be productive for PRL-related genes .
Advancing our understanding of PRL's mechanistic effects requires integration of traditional physiological measurements with contemporary molecular techniques. Researchers should consider implementing RNA-seq analysis of reproductive tissues to identify PRL-responsive genes, or employ proteomics to characterize downstream effectors of PRL signaling. In vivo studies using conditional knockout models targeting specific components of the PRL signaling pathway would provide deeper mechanistic insights. Additionally, high-resolution imaging techniques to visualize PRL receptor distribution in reproductive tissues could identify previously unrecognized sites of action, expanding our understanding of this hormone's complex reproductive roles .
The Prolactin Rabbit Soluble Receptor Recombinant is a biochemically engineered protein that plays a crucial role in the study of prolactin and its interactions within biological systems. This receptor is specifically designed for research purposes and is produced using recombinant DNA technology.
Prolactin is a hormone primarily associated with lactation in mammals. It is produced by the anterior pituitary gland and has various roles, including the regulation of milk production, salt and water balance, growth, development, and reproduction . The prolactin receptor is a protein that binds prolactin, allowing it to exert its effects on target cells.
The Prolactin Rabbit Soluble Receptor Recombinant is produced in Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a non-glycosylated polypeptide chain. This recombinant receptor consists of 207 amino acids and has a molecular mass of approximately 23,972 Daltons . The production process involves the use of proprietary chromatographic techniques to purify the receptor .
The recombinant receptor represents the extracellular domain of the prolactin receptor. This domain is responsible for binding prolactin and mediating its biological effects. By studying the soluble form of the receptor, researchers can gain insights into the mechanisms of prolactin signaling and its role in various physiological processes.
The Prolactin Rabbit Soluble Receptor Recombinant is widely used in biochemical and pharmacological research. It serves as a valuable tool for: