HEK-293 Cells: Yields glycosylated IGF2 with structural fidelity to native human IGF2 .
E. coli: Produces non-glycosylated IGF2 at higher yields; retains bioactivity after refolding .
Proliferation Assays:
Metabolic Effects:
Fetal Growth: Regulates fetoplacental development under placental lactogen influence .
Neural Development: Promotes neural progenitor cell expansion via insulin receptor (IR) activation in the brain .
Neuroprotection:
Cancer:
IR Activation:
IGF1R Interaction:
Glucose Homeostasis:
Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) exhibit growth-promoting activity. IGF-II is a major fetal growth hormone in mammals, playing a crucial role in fetoplacental development and is influenced by placental lactogen. It is also involved in tissue differentiation. In adults, IGF-II likely participates in glucose metabolism within adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and liver. It acts as a ligand for integrins, essential for IGF-II signaling. Furthermore, IGF-II positively regulates the myogenic transcription factor MYOD1 by facilitating the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators, thereby controlling muscle terminal differentiation. It also inhibits myoblast differentiation and modulates metabolism by increasing mitochondrial respiration rate. Preptin, co-secreted with insulin in a glucose-dependent manner, acts as a physiological amplifier of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and demonstrates osteogenic properties by increasing osteoblast mitogenic activity via MAPK1/3 phosphoactivation.
Selected Research Highlights on IGF-II and Preptin:
Recombinant Human IGF-II is a synthetic version of the naturally occurring Insulin-like Growth Factor II, produced through genetic engineering techniques. It is structurally homologous to proinsulin and shares approximately 70% sequence identity with IGF-I . Despite being one of the most abundant growth factors in the human body, IGF-II remains relatively understudied compared to insulin and IGF-I. For every research paper published on IGF-II, approximately three are published on IGF-I and thirty on insulin .
IGF-II is particularly important for research because it:
Functions as a potent mitogenic growth factor during embryonic development
Is expressed in multiple tissues and cell types with potential autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine functions
Exhibits highly conserved structure across species (100% identity between human, bovine, and porcine proteins)
Has complex regulation mechanisms that are dramatically altered during development and disease states
While IGF-II belongs to the insulin-like family and shares structural similarities with both insulin and IGF-I, it has several distinguishing features:
Feature | IGF-II | IGF-I | Insulin |
---|---|---|---|
Size | 67 amino acids | 70 amino acids | 51 amino acids (processed form) |
Sequence identity with IGF-II | 100% | ~70% | Lower |
Primary developmental role | Embryonic/fetal growth | Both embryonic and postnatal growth | Metabolic regulation |
Postnatal expression | Dramatically down-regulated | Maintained at significant levels | Maintained throughout life |
Receptor binding | IGF1R, IGF2R, Insulin receptor | IGF1R, Insulin receptor (lower affinity) | Insulin receptor |
Regulation complexity | Most complex | Intermediate | Less complex than IGFs |
IGF-II has evolved an incredibly intricate series of checks and balances to control its cellular activity, far more complex than those for IGF-I and insulin, suggesting that stringent control of IGF-II is extremely important for cellular function .
IGF-II interacts with multiple receptors, each mediating different biological responses:
IGF-I Receptor (IGF1R):
IGF-II Receptor (IGF2R):
Insulin Receptor (IR):
IGF-II can bind to IR, particularly the IR-A isoform
This interaction contributes to metabolic and mitogenic effects
The balance between these receptor interactions is critical for regulating IGF-II bioavailability and biological effects.
For optimal results when working with recombinant human IGF-II, follow these handling procedures:
Reconstitution Protocol:
Centrifuge vial before opening to collect material at the bottom
Gently pipette the recommended solution down the sides of the vial to avoid protein denaturation
DO NOT VORTEX the solution, as this can damage the protein structure
Allow several minutes for complete reconstitution before use
Storage Recommendations:
For prolonged storage, dilute to working aliquots in a 0.1% BSA solution
Store at -80°C in small, single-use aliquots
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can lead to protein degradation
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is the gold standard method for measuring IGF-II binding affinities to its receptors. Based on published protocols:
Recommended SPR Protocol:
Couple IGF2R fragments (e.g., domains 10-13) to a biosensor surface via amine groups to achieve approximately 2000 resonance units
Conduct binding analysis at 25°C in HBS-EP buffer at a flow rate of 40 μl/min
Prepare IGF-II and mutants at concentrations ranging from 6.25-100 nM
Use a two-state conformational change model for curve fitting, as this best describes the 1:1 binding interaction with conformational change upon binding
Include appropriate regeneration steps (e.g., 10 mM HCl for 1.5 min or 2 M MgCl₂ for 2 min)
Alternative coupling methods include biotinylation of IGF2R constructs and immobilization to streptavidin-coated sensor chips. Note that direct amine coupling typically leads to lower absolute binding affinity measurements compared to biotinylation methods, though relative binding affinities remain consistent .
Researchers commonly encounter several challenges when working with recombinant IGF-II:
Proper Folding:
IGF-II contains three disulfide bonds that must form correctly for biological activity
Expression systems require appropriate oxidizing environments and chaperones
Aggregation Concerns:
IGF-II has hydrophobic regions that can promote aggregation
Addition of stabilizers (e.g., BSA) is often necessary for maintaining solubility
Post-translational Modifications:
Different expression systems may yield variations in glycosylation patterns
Escherichia coli systems (commonly used) produce non-glycosylated IGF-II
Purification Challenges:
Separation from IGF-binding proteins that co-purify with IGF-II
Need for multiple chromatography steps to achieve high purity
Activity Verification:
Essential to confirm biological activity after purification
Typically assessed through cell proliferation assays with IGF-responsive cell lines
IGF-II plays critical roles in embryonic development, making recombinant IGF-II an important tool for developmental studies:
Key Experimental Approaches:
Ex vivo Organ Culture Systems:
Supplement culture media with defined concentrations of recombinant IGF-II
Analyze effects on organ growth, differentiation, and morphogenesis
Compare with IGF-I supplementation to distinguish specific developmental effects
Developmental Timing Studies:
Cell Lineage Specification:
Examine effects of IGF-II on stem cell differentiation into specific lineages
Use in conjunction with other growth factors to optimize differentiation protocols
Tissue-Specific Knockdown/Knockout Models:
Combine recombinant IGF-II administration with genetic models featuring IGF-II deficiency
Assess rescue effects to determine tissue-specific requirements
Researchers can employ several established assays to evaluate the biological activity of recombinant IGF-II:
Cell Proliferation Assays:
MCF-7 breast cancer cells are highly responsive to IGF-II
Measure BrdU incorporation or use MTT/MTS colorimetric assays
Compare with known standards to establish relative potency
Receptor Activation Assays:
Western blot analysis of IGF1R phosphorylation
Downstream signaling activation (Akt, ERK1/2, p70S6K)
Establish dose-response curves (typically 0.1-100 ng/mL range)
Reporter Gene Assays:
Cells transfected with luciferase constructs under control of IGF-responsive elements
Allows quantitative measurement of transcriptional activation
Migration/Invasion Assays:
Transwell or wound healing assays to assess motility responses
Particularly relevant for studying IGF-II's role in cancer cell behavior
Specialized Functional Assays:
IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) significantly impact IGF-II bioavailability and activity in experimental systems:
Methodological Considerations:
Serum Considerations:
Fetal bovine serum contains variable levels of IGFBPs
Consider using defined serum replacement or carefully characterized serum lots
Pre-treatment of serum with acid-ethanol extraction can remove endogenous IGFBPs
Cellular Production of IGFBPs:
Many cell lines produce IGFBPs that can interfere with exogenous IGF-II
Measure IGFBP levels in conditioned media
Consider using IGFBP antibodies or IGF-II analogs with reduced IGFBP binding
Direct vs. Indirect Effects:
Include controls to distinguish direct IGF-II effects from IGFBP-mediated effects
Some cellular responses may be due to displacement of endogenous IGFs from IGFBPs
Quantification Methods:
Use free IGF-II-specific assays rather than total IGF-II measurements
Consider the impact of IGFBP proteases that may be present in the system
Recent evidence suggests E2F3 is a key regulator of IGF-II expression both in development and cancer . Researchers can explore this relationship through:
Investigative Approaches:
Temporal Expression Analysis:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP):
Promoter-Reporter Assays:
Construct reporter systems containing the IGF-II promoter
Test activation by E2F3 in different cellular contexts
Include mutated E2F binding sites as controls
Cancer Models:
Compare E2F3 and IGF-II expression in normal vs. cancer tissues
Analyze correlation between E2F3 and IGF-II levels in human cancer datasets
Microarray data reveals that E2F3-overexpressing prostate and bladder cancers show increased IGF-II expression with positive correlation between E2F3 and IGF-II mRNA levels
Mechanistic Manipulation:
Understanding the signaling specificity of IGF-II is crucial for elucidating its biological functions:
Advanced Methodological Approaches:
Receptor-Specific Mutants and Antagonists:
Use IGF-II analogs with altered receptor binding specificities
Apply receptor-specific blocking antibodies to isolate signaling through individual receptors
CRISPR/Cas9 Receptor Modification:
Generate cell lines with specific receptor knockouts or mutations
Create cells expressing receptor variants with altered downstream signaling capabilities
Phosphoproteomics:
Employ mass spectrometry-based approaches to identify phosphorylation events
Compare IGF-II-induced phosphorylation profiles with those of IGF-I and insulin
Temporal analysis can reveal signaling dynamics and feedback mechanisms
Single-Cell Analysis:
Investigate heterogeneity in IGF-II responses within seemingly homogeneous populations
Correlate receptor expression levels with signaling outputs at single-cell resolution
Biosensors and Live Imaging:
Utilize FRET-based biosensors to monitor signaling events in real-time
Track receptor internalization and trafficking using fluorescently tagged IGF-II
The complex structural relationship between IGF-II and IGF2R provides opportunities for developing targeted therapeutics:
Structure-Based Design Considerations:
Critical Binding Domains:
Key Residue Interactions:
Binding Affinity Modulation:
Deletion of FNII markedly reduces IGF-II binding, causing a 10-fold drop in binding affinity
The Glu1544Lys mutation has different effects depending on the context:
Therapeutic Design Strategies:
Design peptides targeting the IGF-II binding interface of domain 11
Develop antibodies that enhance IGF2R-mediated IGF-II clearance
Create IGF-II variants with altered receptor specificity profiles for targeted applications
IGF-II dysregulation plays significant roles in multiple cancer types:
Key Research Findings:
Overexpression Patterns:
Mechanisms of Overexpression:
Loss of imprinting (LOI) where the normally silenced maternal IGF-II allele becomes expressed
This biallelic expression typically leads to approximately doubled expression
Many cancers show much higher increases in IGF-II, suggesting additional mechanisms
Aberrant activation of the P3 promoter (human, equivalent to mouse P2) is observed in multiple cancers
E2F3 overexpression appears to drive IGF-II overexpression in some cancers, particularly prostate and bladder cancers
Functional Consequences:
Promotes cancer cell proliferation, survival, and invasion
Contributes to tumor angiogenesis
May facilitate metastatic spread
Research Approaches:
Analyze correlations between E2F3 and IGF-II expression in cancer databases
Investigate promoter usage patterns in different cancer types
Examine effects of IGF-II neutralization on cancer cell behavior
Researchers investigating IGF-II in disease states can utilize various experimental models:
Model Systems for IGF-II Research:
Cell Culture Models:
Cancer cell lines with variable IGF-II expression
Primary cells from disease-relevant tissues
3D organoid cultures to better recapitulate tissue architecture
Genetic Mouse Models:
Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX):
Capture tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment interactions
Allow testing of IGF-II-targeting approaches in clinically relevant models
Disease-Specific Models:
For cancer: Orthotopic implantation models for tissue-specific microenvironments
For metabolic disorders: Diet-induced models with IGF-II pathway modulation
For developmental disorders: Ex vivo organ culture systems with recombinant IGF-II supplementation
Disease Applications Beyond Cancer:
IGF-II's diverse biological functions offer several avenues for therapeutic development:
Therapeutic Development Strategies:
IGF-II as a Therapeutic Target:
IGF-II as a Therapeutic Agent:
Receptor Targeting Approaches:
IGF2R-targeted therapies to enhance IGF-II clearance
Selective targeting of IGF1R vs. insulin receptor signaling
Bispecific antibodies engaging multiple components of the IGF system
Methodological Considerations: