Uricase

Urate Oxidase Recombinant
Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Mechanism of Action and Evolutionary Context

Uricase catalyzes:

  1. Oxidation: Uric acid → 5-hydroxyisourate + H₂O₂

  2. Hydrolysis: 5-hydroxyisourate → 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline

  3. Decarboxylation: Final product → Allantoin + CO₂

Humans lack functional uricase due to ancestral pseudogenization, likely linked to dietary shifts favoring fructose metabolism . Resurrected ancestral uricases (e.g., An19/22) retain higher activity than modern pig uricase and share 93% homology with humans, offering therapeutic potential .

Therapeutic Uses

FormulationSourceKey FeaturesReferences
PegloticasePig-Baboon chimeraPEGylated, enhanced half-life (~6 days)
Ancestral UricaseResurrected An19/22Non-PEGylated, 100× stability vs. PBC uricase
Nanoparticle-EncapsulatedCandida uricaseOral delivery, reduced immunogenicity

Clinical Relevance:

  • Gout Treatment: PEG-uricase reduces urate levels in refractory cases .

  • Tumor Lysis Syndrome: Rapidly clears uric acid during chemotherapy .

  • Uric Acid Nephropathy: Prevents renal damage in knockout mice .

Diagnostic Role

Uricase quantifies uric acid in serum/urine via colorimetric assays, serving as a gold standard for hyperuricemia diagnosis . Biosensors integrating uricase enhance sensitivity and portability .

Microbial Sources

OrganismProduction StrategyActivityReferences
Aspergillus welwitschiaePlackett-Burman/CCD optimization58.21 U/mL (optimized)
Candida utilisLyophilized, extracellular≥2 U/mg dry weight

Key Optimization Factors:

  • Nutrients: Sucrose, uric acid, yeast extract .

  • Conditions: pH 8, 35°C, 7-day incubation .

  • Purification: Cell disruption for intracellular enzymes .

Enzymosome Technology

Lipid-based enzymosomes encapsulating uricase (UCU) enhance stability and activity:

  • Alkaline Buffers: Preserve UCU conformation and function .

  • Co-Entrapment: Combining UCU with catalase (CAT) neutralizes H₂O₂ byproducts .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Immunogenicity: PEGylation reduces antibody responses but risks PEG allergies .

  • Stability: Ancestral uricases offer non-PEGylated alternatives with native-like half-lives .

  • Oral Delivery: Nanoparticles improve bioavailability and minimize renal toxicity .

Product Specs

Introduction

Urate oxidase, also known as uricase, is an enzyme that plays a crucial role in the breakdown of purines. It catalyzes the oxidation of uric acid, a waste product of purine metabolism, into allantoin. Allantoin is more soluble than uric acid, making it easier for the body to excrete. Humans and other higher primates lack uricase, making them susceptible to conditions like gout, which is characterized by the buildup of uric acid in the body. Uricase is present in many other organisms and is used therapeutically to manage hyperuricemia, elevated uric acid levels, often associated with gout, malignancies, and organ transplantation. Its rapid action and effectiveness in lowering uric acid levels make it a valuable treatment option.

Description
Recombinant Urate Oxidase, produced in E.Coli, is a protein composed of four identical subunits (tetrameric). It lacks any sugar modifications (non-glycosylated) and has a molecular weight of 34,247 Dalton. Each subunit contains 302 amino acids, and the protein's composition can be represented by the molecular formula C1523H2383N417O462S7. The genetic information for this protein was obtained from Aspergillus flavus. The protein structure is devoid of any internal or inter-chain disulfide bonds, contributing to its stability and solubility.
Physical Appearance
Sterile Filtered White lyophilized (freeze-dried) powder.
Formulation
The formulation of each 1.5mg Uricase vial includes 5mg sucrose, 25mg glycine, 0.1mg Tween-80, 13.6 mg Na2HPO4*12H20, and 0.33 mg NaH2PO4*2H20.
Solubility
For optimal activity in assays, it is strongly advised to reconstitute the lyophilized Uricase in a buffer solution. This buffer should consist of 50mM borate, 0.001% Triton X-100, and 1.0mM EDTA, with a pH adjusted to 8.5.
Stability
Lyophilized Urate Oxidase remains stable for up to 3 weeks when stored at room temperature. However, for long-term storage, it is recommended to keep it desiccated at temperatures below -18°C. After reconstitution, Uricase can be stored at 4°C for 2-7 days. For extended periods, store at temperatures below -18°C. It's crucial to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles to maintain enzyme activity and stability.
Purity

The purity of this product is greater than 90%, as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis.

Biological Activity
The specific activity of the Uricase was measured to be 10 units per milligram (U/mg). One unit is defined as the amount of enzyme required to catalyze the oxidation of one micromole of uric acid per minute at a temperature of 25°C and a pH of 8.5.
Synonyms
Urate Oxidase, Uricase, Urate Oxygen, Oxidoreductase, UOX, UO, EC 1.7.3.
Source
Escherichia Coli.
Amino Acid Sequence
msavkaaryg kdnvrvykvh kdektgvqtv yemtvcvlle geietsytka dnsvivatds ikntiyitak qnpvtppelf gsilgthfie kynhihaahv nivchrwtrm didgkphphs firdseekrn vqvdvvegkg idiksslsgl tvlkstnsqf wgflrdeytt lketwdrils tdvdatwqwk nfsglqevrs hvpkfdatwa tarevtlktf aednsasvqa tmykmaeqil arqqlietve yslpnkhyfe idlswhkglq ntgknaevfa pqsdpnglik ctvgrsslks kl.

Q&A

What is uricase and what is its biological function?

Uricase (also known as urate oxidase) is an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of uric acid to allantoin, which is more soluble and readily excreted. Most mammals express uricase and consequently maintain serum uric acid levels in the 1-3 mg/dl range . The enzyme plays a critical role in purine metabolism by facilitating the elimination of uric acid, which is a metabolic end product of purine catabolism. Methodologically, researchers can assess uricase activity through various approaches, including UV-spectrophotometric methods that monitor the reduction of uric acid at 300 nm or fluorescent assays that measure H₂O₂ production during the reaction .

Why do humans lack functional uricase?

Humans and other great apes lost functional uricase through a series of mutations that progressively reduced the activity of the enzyme until it was completely silenced approximately 15 million years ago during the mid-Miocene period . This evolutionary process involved multiple sequential mutations in the uricase gene, resulting in what is termed "pseudogenization" of the gene. The pattern of these mutations shows redundancy that strongly suggests there was a selective advantage to increased uric acid levels, which is further supported by parallel mutations that increased reabsorption of uric acid in the kidneys . When investigating this question experimentally, researchers have "resurrected" the extinct uricase gene to study its effects in human cells, providing valuable insights into the metabolic consequences of its loss .

How do uric acid levels differ between humans and other mammals?

Due to the loss of functional uricase, humans maintain significantly higher serum uric acid levels compared to most mammals. While animals with active uricase typically maintain levels in the 1-3 mg/dl range, baseline levels in humans and great apes are in the 3-4 mg/dl range . With modern diets rich in fructose-laden sugars and purines, these levels have increased substantially, with approximately 20 million people in the USA having serum uric acid levels greater than 7 mg/dl . Methodologically, researchers can use various analytical techniques to measure uric acid levels across species, including enzymatic assays, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and mass spectrometry for more precise quantification.

What evolutionary hypotheses explain the loss of uricase in humans?

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the selective advantage of uricase loss in human evolution. The predominant theory is the "thrifty gene" hypothesis, suggesting that elevated uric acid levels enhanced the ability of ancestral apes to convert fructose to fat, providing a survival advantage during periods of food scarcity . This adaptation would have been particularly beneficial during the global cooling event in the mid-Miocene that caused great nutritional stress for ancestral apes in Europe . Other hypotheses include potential cognitive benefits from increased uric acid levels due to its antioxidant properties, which may have contributed to brain development . Researchers test these hypotheses through comparative genomics, phylogenetic analyses, and experimental studies with transgenic animal models.

How can we experimentally test the "thrifty gene" hypothesis of uricase loss?

To test the "thrifty gene" hypothesis, researchers have employed various experimental approaches. One method involves "resurrecting" the extinct uricase gene and expressing it in human hepatocytes to assess how its presence affects metabolic responses to fructose. Studies have shown that the loss of uricase in human hepatocytes was associated with enhanced fat accumulation and gluconeogenesis in response to fructose, supporting the hypothesis that the mutation provided survival benefits to ancestral apes . Additional approaches include developing animal models with modified uricase expression (knockouts, inhibition with oxonic acid, or transgenic expression) and studying their metabolic responses under various dietary conditions. Comparing these experimental findings with paleoclimate data and the fossil record can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the evolutionary context.

What are the parallel genetic adaptations related to uric acid metabolism in humans?

Beyond the loss of functional uricase, humans have evolved additional genetic adaptations that influence uric acid metabolism. Research has identified mutations that increase renal retention of uric acid, further contributing to the higher serum levels in humans compared to other mammals . These adaptations suggest a strong evolutionary pressure favoring elevated uric acid levels. Methodologically, researchers use genome-wide association studies (GWAS), comparative genomics, and functional studies of specific transporters (such as URAT1) to identify and characterize these genetic adaptations. The redundancy and parallel nature of these mutations provide strong evidence for positive selection rather than genetic drift.

How does the loss of uricase affect cancer risk and growth?

Experimental evidence suggests that the loss of uricase increases the risk for tumor growth and metastasis. Studies in mice where uricase was either knocked out genetically or inhibited with oxonic acid showed remarkably increased breast cancer tumor growth and metastases, while mice transgenic for uricase exhibited reduced tumor growth . The mechanism likely involves uric acid's ability to cause oxidative stress to mitochondria and reduce ATP production by blocking aconitase in the Krebs cycle, promoting the Warburg effect that benefits cancer cell growth in hypoxic environments . This effect allows tumor cells to multiply in tissues with minimal blood supply. Meta-analyses and Mendelian randomization studies have supported the association between hyperuricemia and increased risk for cancer incidence and mortality .

What is the relationship between fructose metabolism, uric acid, and metabolic syndrome?

The loss of uricase in humans amplifies the metabolic effects of fructose, contributing to the development of metabolic syndrome. Fructose metabolism rapidly generates uric acid, and without functional uricase, these levels remain elevated. Elevated uric acid not only drives many metabolic effects of fructose but also enhances fructose metabolism and production . This creates a positive feedback loop that promotes fat accumulation, insulin resistance, and other features of metabolic syndrome. Experimentally, researchers have demonstrated that uric acid can induce features of metabolic syndrome, though some evidence appears contradictory . The association between hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome becomes particularly problematic in modern food environments with excessive fructose intake, making what was once an evolutionary advantage now a potential liability .

How might elevated uric acid levels impact brain health and cognitive function?

While elevated uric acid has been hypothesized to provide potential benefits for the brain due to its antioxidant properties, research has also associated pathologically high levels with cognitive and psychiatric deficits . The relationship appears complex, as both protective and detrimental effects have been reported. The impact likely depends on the specific concentration, duration of exposure, and interaction with other metabolic factors. Methodologically, researchers examine this relationship through neuroimaging studies, cognitive assessments, and animal models with modified uric acid levels. The dual nature of uric acid's effects on brain health represents an important area for further investigation, particularly given the evolutionary context of uricase loss.

What are the optimal methods for measuring uricase activity in experimental studies?

Several methods exist for measuring uricase activity, each with specific advantages depending on the research context. For high-throughput screening of bacterial uricase activity, an optimized UV-spectrophotometric method has been developed that monitors the reduction of uric acid at 300 nm . This approach enables simultaneous detection of both extracellular and cell-associated uricase activities using whole bacterial suspensions. Fluorescent assays based on H₂O₂ production (such as the Amplex Red Uric Acid/Uricase Assay) provide an alternative approach, though these can be affected by both abiotic factors (medium composition, sterilization method) and biotic factors (H₂O₂-producing strains) . The validity of spectrophotometric methods can be confirmed via liquid chromatography for more precise quantification. When selecting a method, researchers should consider potential interfering factors and validate their approach accordingly.

How can researchers effectively design animal models to study uricase function?

Researchers have developed several approaches to study uricase function in animal models. These include:

  • Uricase knockout models: Genetically engineered mice with the uricase gene inactivated

  • Pharmacological inhibition: Using compounds like oxonic acid to inhibit uricase activity

  • Transgenic expression: Creating animals that express uricase (particularly useful for studying the effects of restoring uricase function in species that naturally lack it)

In the research summarized in the search results, mice with various uricase modifications were injected with breast cancer cells and followed for 4 weeks to assess tumor growth and metastasis . When designing such studies, researchers should consider appropriate controls, the specific research question being addressed, and potential confounding factors such as background strain differences and compensatory mechanisms that may develop in response to uricase modification.

What techniques can be used to screen for uricase activity in microbial species?

For screening uricase activity in microbial species, researchers have developed high-throughput methods applicable to large bacterial collections. A robust UV-spectrophotometric method can be used to monitor uric acid degradation at 300 nm using whole bacterial suspensions, which allows assessment of both cell-associated and extracellular activity simultaneously . The method has been optimized to account for factors that may impact measurement accuracy, including medium composition and mode of sterilization. Validation can be performed via liquid chromatography. Using this approach, researchers screened 319 Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) strains of lactobacilli, Bacillus, and Bifidobacterium, finding that uricase activity is rare among these genera, with only the positive control Bacillus sp. DSM 1306 showing activity . This highlights the importance of comprehensive screening approaches when searching for novel uricolytic strains with therapeutic potential.

How might understanding the uricase mutation inform therapeutic approaches for cancer?

The discovery that uricase loss may increase cancer risk suggests several potential therapeutic approaches. Blocking fructose or uric acid metabolism might represent a target for cancer therapies . Indeed, existing evidence shows that allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor that blocks uric acid formation, reduces breast tumor growth and metastases as well as colonic cancer tumorigenesis in murine models . Future research directions might include developing more specific inhibitors of the pathways linking uric acid to cancer growth, exploring combination therapies with existing cancer treatments, and identifying patient populations that might particularly benefit from uric acid-lowering approaches. Clinically relevant questions include optimal timing of intervention, potential synergistic effects with standard chemotherapies, and whether prophylactic uric acid lowering in high-risk populations could reduce cancer incidence.

What is the evidence for and against the causal role of uric acid in metabolic syndrome?

The relationship between uric acid and metabolic syndrome represents an area of ongoing scientific debate. Some researchers have provided evidence that high uric acid itself induces metabolic syndrome, whereas other evidence seems to contradict this hypothesis . The causal relationship is complicated by potential bidirectional effects, where metabolic syndrome can also increase uric acid levels. When analyzing this complex relationship, researchers should consider:

  • The temporal sequence of elevations in uric acid and development of metabolic syndrome features

  • Dose-response relationships between uric acid levels and metabolic outcomes

  • Results from interventional studies lowering uric acid

  • Genetic evidence from Mendelian randomization studies

  • Mechanistic studies elucidating potential pathways

Resolving these contradictions requires careful experimental design, consideration of confounding factors, and integration of evidence across epidemiological, clinical, and basic science studies.

How can the evolutionary perspective on uricase loss inform our understanding of modern diseases?

The uricase mutation represents a compelling example of how evolutionary adaptations can become maladaptive in changed environments. This evolutionary mismatch between our genetic heritage and modern lifestyle is particularly evident in the context of excessive fructose consumption in contemporary diets. Researchers studying this relationship should consider:

  • How dietary patterns have changed since the Miocene period, particularly regarding fructose intake

  • The interaction between genetic risk factors and environmental exposures

  • Population differences in susceptibility to uric acid-related conditions

  • Potential protective factors that may mitigate the negative effects of uricase loss

This evolutionary perspective reinforces the concept that many modern diseases may result from "thrifty" adaptations that once provided survival advantages but now increase disease risk in our changed environment . This framework can guide both research approaches and potentially inform public health interventions addressing the mismatch between our evolutionary heritage and contemporary lifestyle.

Product Science Overview

Introduction

Urate oxidase, also known as uricase (EC 1.7.3.3), is an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of uric acid to allantoin, a more soluble and easily excreted compound. This enzyme is naturally present in many organisms, including bacteria, fungi, and lower animals, but is notably absent in humans and higher primates due to evolutionary gene silencing .

Evolutionary Significance

The absence of urate oxidase in humans and higher primates is attributed to three specific mutations that have rendered the gene non-functional . This evolutionary change is thought to confer certain advantages, such as the antioxidant properties of uric acid, which may help in reducing oxidative stress and potentially lowering the risk of cancer .

Clinical Relevance

The lack of urate oxidase in humans leads to the accumulation of uric acid, which can result in conditions such as gout and hyperuricemia. Gout is characterized by the formation of monosodium urate crystals in joints and tissues, leading to inflammation and pain . Traditional treatments for gout include medications like allopurinol, but these are not always effective for all patients .

Recombinant Urate Oxidase

To address the limitations of traditional treatments, recombinant urate oxidase has been developed. This enzyme is produced using genetic engineering techniques, where the urate oxidase gene from organisms like Aspergillus flavus is cloned and expressed in suitable host cells, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae . The recombinant enzyme, known as rasburicase, is used to treat hyperuricemia, particularly in patients undergoing chemotherapy .

Mechanism of Action

Urate oxidase catalyzes the conversion of uric acid to 5-hydroxyisourate, which subsequently decomposes to allantoin and carbon dioxide . This reaction does not require any cofactors or metal ions, making it a straightforward enzymatic process . The enzyme functions as a homo-tetramer, with each subunit contributing to the active site located at the dimeric interfaces .

Advances in Recombinant Urate Oxidase

Recent advancements have focused on enhancing the stability and efficacy of recombinant urate oxidase. For instance, PAT101, a novel recombinant human albumin-conjugated urate oxidase variant, has shown promising results in preclinical studies . This variant has an extended half-life and reduced immunogenicity compared to traditional formulations, making it a potential candidate for long-term gout management .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.