GPT Human, Active
Description
Introduction to GPT Human, Active
GPT Human, Active (ENZ-995) is a recombinant form of human alanine aminotransferase 2 (GPT2), a metabolic enzyme critical for glucose and amino acid metabolism. It catalyzes the reversible transamination between alanine and 2-oxoglutarate to produce pyruvate and glutamate . This enzyme is expressed in muscle, fat, and kidney tissues and is essential for studying metabolic disorders, drug development, and cellular energy pathways .
Formulation and Stability
-
Buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 30% glycerol, 2 mM DTT, 0.2 M NaCl .
-
Storage:
-
Avoid: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles to maintain enzymatic activity.
Catalytic Mechanism
GPT2 facilitates the transfer of an amino group from alanine to 2-oxoglutarate, producing pyruvate (a glycolysis intermediate) and glutamate (a key neurotransmitter precursor) . This reaction is vital for gluconeogenesis and nitrogen metabolism.
Applications in Research
GPT Human, Active is utilized in:
-
Metabolic Pathway Analysis: Studying insulin resistance, mitochondrial dysfunction, and urea cycle disorders.
-
Drug Screening: Identifying inhibitors or activators for metabolic disease therapeutics.
-
Enzyme Kinetics: Characterizing substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency under varying pH/temperature conditions.
Comparative Analysis of Recombinant GPT2
The recombinant form retains native enzymatic activity while offering advantages over tissue-extracted GPT2:
| Parameter | Recombinant GPT2 | Native GPT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Purity | >90% (consistent batches) | Variable (20–70%) |
| Scalability | High-yield E. coli system | Limited by tissue source |
| Cost Efficiency | Lower production costs | Expensive extraction |
Research Limitations and Considerations
-
Substrate Inhibition: High concentrations of alanine or 2-oxoglutarate may reduce reaction velocity.
References
-
Prospec Bio. (n.d.). GPT2 Human Active Recombinant. Retrieved from https://www.prospecbio.com/gpt2_human_active
Product Specs
Q&A
What is GPT's role in academic research paradigms?
GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) models serve as advanced research assistants capable of processing and synthesizing large volumes of information beyond traditional database tools. Unlike conventional research tools that retrieve information through direct queries, GPT models can reason through complex problems, identify connections between disparate information pieces, and generate coherent syntheses of research material.
OpenAI's deep research capability demonstrates this evolution, allowing ChatGPT to "find, analyze, and synthesize hundreds of online sources to create a comprehensive report at the level of a research analyst" in a fraction of the time required by human researchers . This capability represents a significant shift in how preliminary research and literature reviews can be conducted.
How does GPT's pattern recognition differ from human research cognition?
GPT and human researchers demonstrate fundamentally different approaches to knowledge processing that researchers must understand to optimize collaboration:
| Aspect | GPT Processing | Human Research Cognition |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Foundation | Statistical patterns from training data | Epistemological understanding and lived experience |
| Pattern Recognition | Identifies linguistic patterns and associations | Combines pattern recognition with causal understanding |
| Information Synthesis | Generates responses based on learned co-occurrences | Constructs knowledge through critical evaluation |
| Limitations | Lacks epistemological understanding | Limited by cognitive biases and processing capacity |
| Domain Transfer | Makes connections across diverse fields based on linguistic patterns | Makes connections through analogical reasoning and domain expertise |
As explained in higher education resources, "Human knowledge is epistemological, because we can deconstruct composite knowledge and we can understand the relationships between these elements as they exist in the real world. In contrast, ChatGPT and other generative AI models are solipsistic because they do not 'know' in the way we do: they lack cognition, cannot perceive, nor can they rationalise or construct knowledge" . This distinction highlights why GPT should be viewed as a complementary research tool rather than an autonomous researcher.
What baseline capabilities should researchers expect from GPT for academic work?
Researchers can realistically expect several core capabilities from current GPT models that are particularly valuable in academic contexts:
-
Literature exploration and summarization: GPT can process and synthesize information from multiple sources, helping identify relevant literature and extract key findings across disciplines.
-
Research question refinement: GPT can assist in articulating and refining research questions by suggesting alternative phrasings or identifying potential gaps in existing literature.
-
Methodological consultation: GPT can suggest appropriate methodologies based on research questions and objectives, drawing from its training on academic literature across disciplines.
-
Draft generation: GPT can assist in generating initial drafts of research components, including literature reviews, methodology descriptions, and discussion points.
-
Data interpretation assistance: GPT can help interpret data patterns and suggest possible explanations or theoretical frameworks that researchers might not immediately consider.
These capabilities are enhanced by GPT's "deep research" functionality, which allows it to "leverage reasoning to search, interpret, and analyze massive amounts of text, images, and PDFs on the internet, pivoting as needed in reaction to information it encounters" . This makes GPT particularly valuable for preliminary research stages and comprehensive literature reviews that would otherwise require extensive manual searching.
How can researchers optimize GPT's reasoning capabilities for complex experimental design?
Optimizing GPT for complex experimental design requires strategic prompting and iterative refinement approaches that capitalize on its pattern recognition while compensating for its lack of direct research experience:
-
Framework-based prompting: Structure prompts around established experimental design frameworks (e.g., factorial designs, randomized controlled trials) to guide GPT's reasoning process.
-
Component-wise development: Break down experimental design into discrete components (participant selection, variable operationalization, control mechanisms) and address each separately before integration.
-
Counterfactual analysis: Ask GPT to identify potential confounds, limitations, or alternative explanations for your proposed design, utilizing its capability to consider multiple perspectives.
-
Comparative evaluation: Request GPT to compare multiple experimental approaches for your research questions, evaluating strengths and limitations of each methodology.
-
Methodological synthesis: Use GPT to synthesize methodological approaches from different disciplines that might be applicable to your research question.
When developing prompts for experimental design, researchers should specify:
-
The research domain and its unique methodological considerations
-
Key variables and their theoretical relationships
-
Anticipated challenges or limitations
-
Ethical considerations relevant to the research question
-
Resource constraints that might impact design choices
This structured approach leverages GPT's pattern recognition capabilities while applying appropriate constraints based on research realities and disciplinary standards.
What approaches enable GPT to assist in resolving contradictory research findings?
When faced with contradictory research findings, GPT can assist researchers through several structured approaches that capitalize on its ability to process diverse perspectives:
-
Meta-analytical framing: Prompt GPT to analyze contradictory findings through a meta-analytical lens, identifying potential moderating variables that explain divergent results.
-
Methodological comparison: Direct GPT to systematically compare the methodological approaches of contradictory studies, highlighting differences that might account for discrepant findings.
-
Theoretical integration: Ask GPT to propose integrative theoretical frameworks that can accommodate seemingly contradictory results within a coherent explanatory model.
-
Temporal and contextual analysis: Guide GPT to examine how temporal factors, research contexts, or population differences might explain contradictory findings across studies.
-
Measurement and construct examination: Use GPT to analyze how different operationalizations or measurements of key constructs might contribute to contradictory results.
An effective prompt structure for this purpose could be:
"Analyze the contradictory findings from [Study A] and [Study B] regarding [research question]. Consider: (1) methodological differences, (2) population characteristics, (3) measurement approaches, (4) contextual factors, and (5) potential mediating or moderating variables that might explain these contradictions. Then, propose a research design that could help resolve these contradictions."
This approach leverages GPT's ability to identify patterns across sources while maintaining a structured analytical framework that researchers can subsequently evaluate.
How can researchers use GPT to enhance interdisciplinary knowledge synthesis?
GPT's training across diverse domains makes it particularly valuable for interdisciplinary research synthesis through several methodological approaches:
-
Cross-domain terminology mapping: GPT can identify equivalent concepts across different disciplines that use different terminology, facilitating knowledge integration.
-
Methodological cross-pollination: Researchers can prompt GPT to suggest how methodological approaches from one discipline might be adapted for research questions in another.
-
Theoretical bridge-building: GPT can identify potential theoretical connections between seemingly disparate research domains that might not be immediately apparent to domain specialists.
-
Gap identification: By comparing literature across disciplines, GPT can highlight unexplored intersections that might yield novel research insights.
-
Interdisciplinary research design: Researchers can use GPT to develop research designs that integrate methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and analytical approaches from multiple disciplines.
A structured approach for interdisciplinary synthesis might include:
| Step | Prompt Structure | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Domain mapping | "Identify key theoretical frameworks in [Domain A] and [Domain B] related to [research phenomenon]" | Comparison of theoretical approaches |
| 2. Conceptual alignment | "Map conceptual equivalences between [Domain A] and [Domain B] regarding [research phenomenon]" | Terminology crosswalk |
| 3. Methodological integration | "Suggest how methodological approaches from [Domain A] could enhance research in [Domain B] on [research phenomenon]" | Novel methodological approaches |
| 4. Gap analysis | "Identify research questions at the intersection of [Domain A] and [Domain B] that remain unexplored" | Potential research directions |
| 5. Synthesis framework | "Propose an integrative framework that synthesizes insights from [Domain A] and [Domain B] on [research phenomenon]" | Interdisciplinary framework |
This systematic approach leverages GPT's comprehensive training to identify connections that might be missed by researchers working within disciplinary boundaries.
What prompt engineering techniques yield optimal research-grade responses from GPT?
Effective prompt engineering for research applications requires structured approaches that compensate for GPT's limitations while leveraging its strengths:
-
Hierarchical prompting: Structure prompts to move from general to specific, allowing GPT to establish a conceptual framework before addressing detailed questions.
-
Role assignment: Direct GPT to adopt specific expert roles (e.g., "Respond as an expert in quantitative sociological methods") to access domain-specific patterns in its training.
-
Output structuring: Specify desired output formats (e.g., "Provide your analysis in the form of: (1) methodological assessment, (2) theoretical implications, (3) alternative interpretations").
-
Constraint specification: Clearly articulate both epistemic and practical constraints to focus GPT's responses (e.g., "Consider only randomized controlled trials published after 2015").
-
Iterative refinement: Use initial responses to formulate more targeted follow-up prompts that address specific aspects of the research question.
Research on communication with AI systems suggests that prompts demonstrating "analytical style" with "detailed and logical explanations" tend to produce more rigorous responses for academic purposes .
A methodological framework for research prompt engineering:
| Prompt Component | Function | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Context setting | Establishes research domain and scope | "In the context of cognitive neuroscience research on working memory..." |
| Role assignment | Specifies expert perspective | "Respond as a research methodologist specializing in longitudinal designs..." |
| Task specification | Defines the specific research task | "Evaluate the following experimental design for internal validity threats..." |
| Constraint articulation | Limits the scope of response | "Consider only approaches that are feasible in resource-limited settings..." |
| Output structuring | Organizes the response format | "Provide your assessment in three sections: strengths, limitations, and alternatives..." |
| Evaluation criteria | Specifies assessment standards | "Evaluate based on construct validity, statistical power, and practical feasibility..." |
How should researchers validate and verify GPT-generated research insights?
Validation of GPT-generated research insights requires systematic approaches that address the unique characteristics of large language models:
-
Source triangulation: Cross-reference GPT-generated insights with primary literature to verify factual claims and theoretical interpretations.
-
Expert review: Submit GPT-generated analyses to domain experts for critical evaluation, particularly for novel or counterintuitive insights.
-
Logical assessment: Evaluate the internal consistency and logical structure of GPT's reasoning, identifying potential non sequiturs or unjustified leaps.
-
Empirical testing: When possible, design empirical tests of hypotheses or interpretations suggested by GPT.
-
Alternative generation: Prompt GPT to generate alternative explanations or interpretations, then critically compare these alternatives.
As noted in academic resources, GPT lacks "epistemological" knowledge and cannot "perceive, nor can they rationalise or construct knowledge" , making validation particularly important.
A systematic validation framework might include:
| Validation Dimension | Assessment Method | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|
| Factual accuracy | Cross-reference with primary sources | Unverifiable claims, misattributed findings |
| Methodological soundness | Expert review of proposed methods | Impractical designs, mismatched methods for research questions |
| Logical coherence | Structured analysis of argument flow | Non sequiturs, circular reasoning, unfounded assumptions |
| Theoretical alignment | Comparison with established theories | Contradictions with fundamental principles, unexplained divergence |
| Novel insights | Assessment of originality and value | Restatement of common knowledge as novel, implausible connections |
This multidimensional validation approach ensures that GPT-generated insights meet scientific standards before incorporation into research.
What frameworks exist for integrating GPT into established research workflows?
Several frameworks have emerged for integrating GPT into research workflows while maintaining scientific rigor:
-
Augmented Literature Review (ALR) Framework: Uses GPT to expand literature search, identify thematic connections, and generate preliminary syntheses that researchers then verify and refine.
-
Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDA+) Approach: Integrates GPT into qualitative data analysis workflows for initial coding, theme identification, and pattern recognition, followed by researcher verification.
-
Iterative Prompt-Response-Validation (IPRV) Model: Establishes cycles of GPT interaction where researchers progressively refine prompts based on critical evaluation of responses.
-
Multi-Agent Research Support (MARS) System: Employs multiple GPT instances with different specialized roles (e.g., literature reviewer, methodological consultant, critical evaluator) to create a balanced research support environment.
-
Transparent AI-Assisted Research (TAIR) Protocol: Provides guidelines for documenting AI contributions to research, ensuring transparency about the role of GPT in the research process.
Implementation considerations for these frameworks include:
| Framework | Primary Research Phases | Documentation Requirements | Validation Mechanisms |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALR | Literature review, hypothesis generation | Source tracking, prompt archiving | Source verification, expert review |
| CAQDA+ | Data analysis, pattern identification | Coding scheme comparison, AI vs. human coding | Inter-coder reliability testing |
| IPRV | Throughout research process | Prompt evolution, response evaluation criteria | Systematic response evaluation |
| MARS | Multiple research phases | Role assignments, interaction protocols | Cross-agent verification |
| TAIR | Throughout research process | AI contribution disclosure, prompt documentation | Transparent reporting |
These frameworks provide structured approaches to leveraging GPT's capabilities while maintaining scientific integrity through appropriate validation and documentation.
What epistemic limitations must researchers consider when using GPT for knowledge synthesis?
Researchers must acknowledge several fundamental epistemic limitations when using GPT for knowledge synthesis:
-
Temporal knowledge boundaries: GPT's knowledge is limited to its training cutoff date, potentially missing recent research developments.
-
Source verification challenges: GPT may synthesize information without the ability to properly attribute or verify original sources.
-
Confidence-accuracy misalignment: GPT can present speculative or incorrect information with high linguistic confidence, obscuring epistemic uncertainty.
-
Emergent reasoning limitations: GPT lacks genuine understanding of causal relationships, instead inferring them from textual patterns.
-
Domain-specific knowledge gaps: GPT's training may have uneven coverage across academic disciplines, leading to variable quality in different research domains.
As noted in higher education resources, GPT "does not 'know' in the way we do: they lack cognition, cannot perceive, nor can they rationalise or construct knowledge" . This fundamental limitation necessitates careful human oversight of all GPT-generated research content.
The epistemic landscape of GPT-based research assistance:
| Epistemic Dimension | GPT Capability | Human Researcher Role | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factual knowledge | Pattern-based retrieval from training data | Verification against primary sources | Systematic fact-checking protocols |
| Causal understanding | Linguistic approximation of causal relationships | Critical evaluation of proposed causal mechanisms | Explicit causal modeling separate from GPT |
| Methodological reasoning | Recognition of methodological patterns | Assessment of methodological appropriateness | Expert review of methodological suggestions |
| Theoretical integration | Identification of linguistic connections between theories | Evaluation of theoretical compatibility | Framework-based assessment of theoretical syntheses |
| Novel insight generation | Recombination of existing knowledge patterns | Discernment of genuine vs. apparent novelty | Empirical testing of novel hypotheses |
How should researchers address attribution and transparency when using GPT in published research?
Proper attribution and transparency in GPT-assisted research requires systematic documentation and disclosure:
-
Process documentation: Maintain detailed records of how GPT was used, including specific prompts, the model version, and any post-processing of GPT outputs.
-
Contribution delineation: Clearly distinguish between GPT-generated content, researcher-modified content, and researcher-original content.
-
Methodological disclosure: Describe in methods sections how GPT was used, including specific research tasks where GPT assistance was employed.
-
Limitation acknowledgment: Explicitly discuss the limitations of GPT-assisted research processes and how these limitations were addressed.
-
Verification reporting: Document the verification processes used to validate GPT-generated insights or content.
A comprehensive attribution framework might include:
| Research Component | Attribution Approach | Documentation Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Literature review | "Initial literature mapping assisted by GPT, verified and expanded by researchers" | Prompt used for literature mapping, verification protocol |
| Hypothesis generation | "Alternative hypotheses generated through researcher-GPT dialogue, final selection by researchers" | Prompt-response sequences, selection criteria |
| Methodological design | "Research design developed by researchers with methodological consultation from GPT" | Design elements sourced from GPT, researcher modifications |
| Data analysis | "Initial pattern identification assisted by GPT, verified and interpreted by researchers" | Analysis prompts, verification methodology |
| Theoretical interpretation | "Alternative theoretical frameworks suggested by GPT, critically evaluated by researchers" | Theoretical frameworks considered, evaluation criteria |
| Manuscript preparation | "Draft sections assisted by GPT, extensively revised and verified by researchers" | Draft generation approach, revision process |
This transparent documentation approach ensures research integrity while acknowledging the valuable contributions of AI assistance.
What approaches help researchers identify and mitigate potential biases in GPT-assisted research?
Addressing bias in GPT-assisted research requires structured approaches to identification and mitigation:
-
Multi-perspective prompting: Deliberately prompt GPT from different theoretical, cultural, or methodological perspectives to reveal potential biases.
-
Counterfactual testing: Test whether GPT produces different responses when equivalent research questions are framed in different ways.
-
Demographic variation: Examine whether GPT's responses vary based on demographic characteristics mentioned in research contexts.
-
Citation pattern analysis: Assess whether GPT preferentially cites or references certain types of sources, researchers, or theoretical traditions.
-
Expert diversity panel: Have experts from diverse backgrounds review GPT-generated content for potential biases.
A systematic bias detection and mitigation framework:
| Bias Type | Detection Method | Mitigation Approach | Documentation Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical bias | Comparative response analysis across theoretical frameworks | Multi-framework prompting | Theoretical diversity in prompts |
| Cultural bias | Cultural perspective variation in equivalent prompts | Culturally-centered prompting | Cultural assumptions examination |
| Demographic bias | Demographic characteristic variation in research scenarios | Inclusive scenario design | Demographic variables considered |
| Methodological bias | Cross-methodology comparison of recommendations | Multi-methodology consultation | Methodological diversity in prompts |
| Citation bias | Analysis of suggested citations or references | Deliberate citation diversity prompting | Citation pattern analysis |
This systematic approach helps researchers identify and address potential biases before they affect research outcomes.
How might GPT-integrated research methodologies evolve with advancing AI capabilities?
The evolution of GPT-integrated research methodologies will likely progress along several dimensions:
-
Autonomous literature synthesis: Future GPT models may autonomously identify research gaps and suggest novel research directions based on comprehensive literature analysis.
-
Multi-modal research integration: Enhanced GPT systems will likely integrate text, image, video, and data analysis capabilities, enabling more comprehensive research support.
-
Dynamic knowledge updating: Future systems may incorporate continuous learning capabilities that update their knowledge base with recent research findings.
-
Methodological hybridization: GPT-assisted research may evolve specialized methodological approaches that blend traditional and AI-enhanced research methods.
-
Collaborative intelligence frameworks: Formalized models for human-AI research collaboration will likely emerge, defining optimal division of research tasks.
OpenAI's deep research capability represents an early step in this direction, with the ability to "leverage reasoning to search, interpret, and analyze massive amounts of text, images, and PDFs on the internet, pivoting as needed in reaction to information it encounters" .
Projected evolution of GPT-integrated research:
| Time Horizon | Technological Development | Research Methodology Impact | Adaptation Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Near-term (1-2 years) | Enhanced multi-modal capabilities | Integration of visual and textual data analysis | Multi-modal prompt engineering skills |
| Medium-term (3-5 years) | Domain-specialized GPT variants | Discipline-specific research methodologies | Domain-specific AI research training |
| Longer-term (5-10 years) | Autonomous research agents | AI-initiated research directions | Human-AI research governance frameworks |
| Extended (10+ years) | General research intelligence | Fundamental shifts in knowledge production | New epistemological frameworks |
What novel research paradigms might emerge from human-GPT collaborative knowledge production?
Human-GPT collaboration may catalyze several novel research paradigms:
-
Scale-bridging research: GPT's ability to process vast information allows researchers to more effectively connect micro-level phenomena with macro-level patterns.
-
Cross-disciplinary synthesis science: New research approaches focused specifically on identifying and exploring connections across traditionally separated domains.
-
Accelerated theory testing: Rapid generation and preliminary evaluation of multiple theoretical explanations before empirical testing.
-
Iterative knowledge refinement: Research workflows based on continuous cycles of GPT-assisted hypothesis generation, evaluation, and refinement.
-
Perspective-symmetric research: Methodologies that deliberately incorporate multiple theoretical, cultural, and epistemological perspectives from the outset.
As OpenAI notes, "The ability to synthesize knowledge is a prerequisite for creating new knowledge," suggesting that GPT's synthesis capabilities may eventually contribute to knowledge creation .
Potential novel research paradigms:
| Paradigm | Key Characteristics | Enabling GPT Capabilities | Research Domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massively Integrative Research | Synthesis across hundreds of sub-disciplines | Large-scale pattern recognition | Complex systems science, sustainability research |
| Reality-aligned Theory Development | Rapid theoretical iteration against empirical data | Hypothesis generation and evaluation | Social sciences, psychology |
| Multi-perspective Knowledge Production | Systematic incorporation of diverse viewpoints | Perspective modeling | Cultural studies, global health |
| Continuous Knowledge Evolution | Dynamic updating of theoretical frameworks | Pattern adaptation | Rapidly evolving fields like technology studies |
| Meta-scientific Research | Research focused on optimizing research processes | Methodological pattern analysis | Science of science, research methodology |
What skills will future researchers need to effectively leverage advanced GPT systems in scientific inquiry?
Future researchers will need a diverse skill set to effectively leverage advanced GPT systems:
-
AI literacy: Understanding the capabilities, limitations, and appropriate research applications of GPT and related systems.
-
Prompt engineering expertise: Advanced skills in designing prompts that elicit optimal research support from GPT systems.
-
Critical AI evaluation: Ability to systematically evaluate GPT outputs for accuracy, bias, and limitations.
-
Epistemic boundary management: Skills in determining appropriate divisions between human and AI contributions to research.
-
AI research ethics: Understanding of ethical considerations specific to AI-assisted research.
-
Multi-modal integration: Capability to work with GPT systems across text, data, image, and other information modalities.
-
AI-augmented research design: Expertise in designing research that optimally integrates AI capabilities.
Core competencies for future AI-integrated research:
| Competency Area | Specific Skills | Development Approaches | Assessment Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical AI understanding | GPT capabilities and limitations, interaction mechanics | Technical training, hands-on experience | Practical demonstration of effective AI use |
| Critical evaluation | Output verification, bias detection, limitation identification | Analytical framework training, comparative analysis | Critical analysis of AI-generated content |
| Research design | AI-integrated workflows, task allocation, verification systems | Methodological training, pilot projects | Research protocol development |
| Ethical application | Attribution practices, transparency protocols, bias mitigation | Ethics training, case studies | Ethical assessment of research proposals |
| Communication | Clear documentation of AI use, transparent reporting | Communication training, template development | Publication quality assessment |
Product Science Overview
The human recombinant form of GPT is produced in E. coli and is a homodimer, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain containing 495 amino acids with a molecular mass of approximately 54,479 Daltons . The amino acid sequence of this recombinant enzyme is identical to that of the native form found in the human liver .
GPT is involved in cellular nitrogen metabolism and liver gluconeogenesis, starting with precursors transported from skeletal muscles . It is widely used as a biomarker for liver health, as elevated levels of GPT in the serum can indicate liver injury caused by drug toxicity, infection, alcohol, and steatosis .
The recombinant GPT enzyme is stable at 10°C for up to 5 days but should be stored below -18°C to prevent freeze-thaw cycles, which can affect its stability . The enzyme is typically formulated in a sterile liquid solution containing sodium acetate buffer, DTT, EDTA, 2-oxoglutarate, and pyridoxal-5’-phosphate .
