CD44 Mouse Antibody

Rat Anti-Mouse CD44
Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Q&A

What critical experimental parameters determine CD44 antibody performance in murine models?

CD44 antibody efficacy depends on three factors: (1) clone-epitope specificity, (2) administration protocol, and (3) endpoint validation. The IM7 clone (binds conserved hyaluronan-binding domain) demonstrates superior in vivo neutralization compared to KM114 in metabolic studies, requiring daily 50-100 μg intraperitoneal doses for sustained CD44 shedding . Validation should include:

Validation MetricIM7 Clone Performance KM114 Clone Performance
In vivo neutralizationReduces CD44+ leukocytes by 68%Limited neutralization data
Inflammatory marker suppressionTNF-α ↓72%, IL-6 ↓65%Not characterized
Metabolic impactFasting glucose ↓40%No reported metabolic effects

Endpoint analysis must quantify both membrane-bound CD44 (flow cytometry) and shed soluble CD44 (ELISA), as certain clones preferentially detect either form .

How does CD44 isoform complexity impact antibody selection?

CD44 exists in ≥19 isoforms through alternative splicing . While IM7 recognizes all isoforms due to its epitope location in the conserved hyaluronan-binding domain, clones like KM201 show isoform-specific binding patterns. Researchers must:

  • Perform isoform-specific RT-PCR on target tissues

  • Compare antibody binding affinity across isoforms using surface plasmon resonance

  • Validate detection specificity through CRISPR-mediated isoform knockout controls

In adipose tissue inflammation models, IM7’s pan-isoform neutralization proved essential for reducing macrophage infiltration (CD68+ cells ↓58%) compared to isoform-specific antibodies .

What mechanisms explain contradictory findings in CD44 antibody studies?

Contradictions arise primarily from four variables:

VariableImpact ExampleResolution Strategy
Mouse strainC57BL/6 vs. BALB/c show 3.2-fold CD44 expression differences Pre-screen CD44 expression via flow cytometry
Antibody timingEarly intervention (week 8) reduces glucose by 40% vs. 12% in late intervention (week 20) Standardize treatment windows
Disease modelHFD-induced diabetes vs. spontaneous T2D models show differential CD44 dynamicsCross-validate in ≥2 model systems
Endpoint selectionMembrane CD44 vs. soluble CD44 measurements yield opposing correlations with IRMulti-parametric analysis

A meta-analysis of 27 studies reveals that 68% of contradictions resolve when controlling for these variables .

How can researchers optimize CD44 antibody dosing for dual immune/metabolic endpoints?

Therapeutic dosing requires balancing immune modulation and metabolic effects:

ParameterImmune-OptimizedMetabolic-OptimizedDual-Action Protocol
Dose100 μg loading + 50 μg maintenance 25 μg continuous100 μg day 1 → 75 μg days 2-7 → 50 μg thereafter
FrequencyQDQODQD week 1 → Q3D maintenance
Outcome79% macrophage reduction35% glucose lowering62% macrophage reduction + 48% glucose lowering

This phased approach prevents CD44 receptor saturation while maintaining therapeutic levels, as validated in HFD models showing sustained HbA1c reductions (8.2% → 6.1%) over 12 weeks .

What orthogonal techniques resolve CD44 antibody specificity challenges?

Three confirmation methods are essential:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 CD44 knockout controls: Compare antibody signal in WT vs. KO tissues

  • Competitive binding assays: Pre-incubate with recombinant CD44 extracellular domain (10 μg/mL blocks >90% IM7 binding)

  • Multispectral imaging: Colocalize antibody signal with CD44-GFP reporters

In diabetes models, these methods revealed that 22% of commercial CD44 antibodies cross-react with CD74, necessitating rigorous validation .

How should researchers design controls for in vivo CD44 antibody studies?

A robust control panel includes:

Control TypeCompositionPurpose
IsotypeRat IgG2b κ Baseline immune activation
Ligand blockadeHyaluronan oligosaccharides (10 mg/kg) Confirm CD44-specific effects
GeneticCD44-/- miceAbsolute specificity verification
PharmacologicSoluble CD44-Fc fusion protein (1 mg/kg) Competitive inhibition control

In adipose tissue studies, this control matrix differentiated antibody-specific effects (68% inflammation reduction) from nonspecific immune activation (12% reduction in isotype controls) .

What biomarkers validate functional CD44 antibody activity in vivo?

Five essential biomarkers:

  • Soluble CD44: ↑2.4-fold in serum post-antibody administration

  • Adipose tissue CLS count: ↓ from 12.3 ± 1.2 to 5.1 ± 0.8 CLS/mm²

  • Hepatic CD44+ macrophages: Flow cytometry gating (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+CD44+)

  • Insulin signaling: p-AKT/AKT ratio in muscle and liver

  • Cytokine profile: Multiplex analysis of IL-1β, TNF-α, MCP-1

Longitudinal monitoring should occur at days 0, 7, 14, and 28 to capture dynamic responses .

Concluding Recommendations

  • Prioritize IM7 clone for metabolic studies requiring pan-isoform neutralization

  • Implement phased dosing regimens to balance efficacy and toxicity

  • Employ multi-parametric validation across ≥3 model systems

  • Standardize control matrices to isolate CD44-specific effects

Product Science Overview

Production and Characteristics

The Rat Anti-Mouse CD44 antibody is typically produced by immunizing rats with mouse CD44 antigen. The resulting hybridoma cells are then screened for the production of antibodies that specifically bind to CD44. These antibodies are purified from the culture supernatant or ascites fluid using affinity chromatography .

Some key characteristics of Rat Anti-Mouse CD44 antibodies include:

  • Isotype: Rat IgG2b, κ or Rat IgG2a, κ
  • Immunogen: Dexamethasone-induced, SJL mouse spontaneous myeloid leukemia M1 cells
  • Applications: Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry (formalin-fixed paraffin and acetone-fixed frozen sections), and other immunoassays
Applications in Research

Rat Anti-Mouse CD44 antibodies are valuable tools in various research applications, including:

  1. Flow Cytometry: These antibodies are used to stain cells for the detection and quantification of CD44 expression on the cell surface. This is particularly useful for studying the activation and differentiation of immune cells .

  2. Immunohistochemistry: Rat Anti-Mouse CD44 antibodies are used to stain tissue sections to visualize the distribution and localization of CD44-expressing cells. This can provide insights into the role of CD44 in tissue architecture and pathology .

  3. Functional Studies: These antibodies can be used to block or stimulate CD44 function in various experimental settings. For example, they can be used to inhibit CD44-mediated cell adhesion or to induce signaling pathways downstream of CD44 .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.